very good system who encodes with rx
You tested it? Or how can you say that it is a very good system?
In the first 15 spins you will have about 13 unique numbers. So 24 unique numbers remain unhit.
For the next 8 spins we are expecting to see about 6 unique numbers from the 24 that they have left unhit.
So we bet on 9 unhit numbers with the hope of one of them will be one of the 6 new numbers from the 24 unhit that they will appear.
I think on the long run is too risky
Thanks
Quote from: huskerdu on May 15, 04:10 AM 2020
In the first 15 spins you will have about 13 unique numbers. So 24 unique numbers remain unhit.
For the next 8 spins we are expecting to see about 6 unique numbers from the 24 that they have left unhit.
So we bet on 9 unhit numbers with the hope of one of them will be one of the 6 new numbers from the 24 unhit that they will appear.
I think on the long run is too risky
Thanks
I think I know pretty much all there is to know about repeaters. Long run/short run... this one is designed to fail. It's all about luck here.
in a year I only lost 2 times
but with the stop loss then you recover that lost session
Quote from: puntoit on May 15, 06:17 AM 2020
in a year I only lost 2 times
but with the stop loss then you recover that lost session
How much did you play? You should be a millionaire :)
Hi PUNTOIT ...
How many games you payed in one year and
how much money tou made
Thanks
I insert 100 spins then I start the game maximum one hour I make 20 - 30 euros and I close stop
if there is someone capable of decoding with the possibility of restricting or restricting scissors to make other tests
Quote from: huskerdu on May 15, 04:10 AM 2020
In the first 15 spins you will have about 13 unique numbers. So 24 unique numbers remain unhit.
For the next 8 spins we are expecting to see about 6 unique numbers from the 24 that they have left unhit.
So we bet on 9 unhit numbers with the hope of one of them will be one of the 6 new numbers from the 24 unhit that they will appear.
I think on the long run is too risky
Thanks
He said a wheel-sector of 9 unhit, not the last 9 unhit!
Quote from: winkel on May 15, 01:43 PM 2020
He said a wheel-sector of 9 unhit, not the last 9 unhit!
that's right, they can't even read
Quote from: winkel on May 15, 01:43 PM 2020He said a wheel-sector of 9 unhit, not the last 9 unhit
I know. I didn't wrote anywhere about "the last 9 unhit".
Quote from: Steeefan2014 on May 15, 04:28 AM 2020I think I know pretty much all there is to know about repeaters.
Are you sure? ;)
Did you know that if the last repeater was a high number, there is more than 50% probability that that the next one will be also high?
Did you know that if a repeater is a high number, the number before the repeat has over 50% probability to be also a high number?
There are many more cases where the statistics are not balanced. But of course it doesn't mean it's possible to exploit these imbalances, because you will
never know when there repeats will happen.
Quote from: huskerdu on May 15, 04:10 AM 2020
In the first 15 spins you will have about 13 unique numbers. So 24 unique numbers remain unhit.
For the next 8 spins we are expecting to see about 6 unique numbers from the 24 that they have left unhit.
So we bet on 9 unhit numbers with the hope of one of them will be one of the 6 new numbers from the 24 unhit that they will appear.
I think on the long run is too risky
Thanks
What part of the post was this meant for?
If memory serves right in the book by John Solitude he mentions that the unhit 9 adjoining numbers were 17 and the probability to hit after 17 was 99%.
I am sorry I have been away from here for a long time. But I am sure the numbers are close enough.
Who ever has a copy would love to know if I am right?
To Winkel,
Winkel, How are you? Feel like going to the GUT thread and do the second part? I know somewhere you mentioned to Nottohammer we was already well advanced.
I am sure everyone else would love you to carry on.
Thanks
Azim
Quote from: ati on May 15, 06:33 PM 2020
Are you sure? ;)
Did you know that if the last repeater was a high number, there is more than 50% probability that that the next one will be also high?
Did you know that if a repeater is a high number, the number before the repeat has over 50% probability to be also a high number?
There are many more cases where the statistics are not balanced. But of course it doesn't mean it's possible to exploit these imbalances, because you will never know when there repeats will happen.
I said "I think" :)
Anyway, regarding these 2 examples that you mentioned - I think you are aware of the fact that it's nothing else than fallacy!
Quote from: puntoit on May 14, 07:22 PM 2020
very good system who encodes with rx
i sent a pm to you..see
What's a very good system?
You won a bit? It survives more spins?
Those just depend on things like spins you test on, and how aggressive progression is.
All you're really doing is making random bets of random size.
Hi Steve you have to use the stop loss, it is known that all systems if played continuously sooner or later jump.
The loss will be recovered in the subsequent games. This is important to win little but win.
I was looking for rx code to be able to test even with selections of more or less numbers but it seems that it is difficult to do
A stop-loss does nothing. Its for gambling, and quitting while you're ahead - if you've been lucky.
Most players take years to understand that all the systems they've been using are exactly the same as random betting.
They think it's not random because they are making bets based on logic. But the wheel doesnt give a shit about your version of logic.
Quote from: puntoit on May 14, 07:22 PM 2020
very good system who encodes with rx
Hello,
Here is the graph of your system...
Post it let's see if that's what I explained, because I see that many have not understood it
thanks :thumbsup:
Quote from: puntoit on May 19, 05:08 PM 2020
Post it let's see if that's what I explained, because I see that many have not understood it
thanks :thumbsup:
I replied to you in PM.
Anyway, here is another graph against 10 000 Live spins
Ten thousand spins at, say, 50 an hour.
Two hundred hour!
Don't think so.