If we have a FLAT betting system that is on the STREETS and in every spin we bet 1-5 streets and after 865 betted spins we are +155 chips with the biggest down -80 chips is it supposed to be something strong or the testing is too little.....
I am asking the maths guys and the guys that have tested a lot of flat bet systems.
I'm not sure if I meet your criteria but here's my 2 cents:
I would say that's less than 1% of the spins you need to get a clear read on the system.
ill do some testing
I'd somehow refer to the Van Keelen Test. for playing single streets it demands these results:
1000 spins = 200 units won
8000 spins = 500 units won
100.000 spins = any amount of units won above 0
all spins played masse egal
cheers
hans
You probably have caught a good streak with your system. I am sure that with every other system I have tested, it will eventually go negative and stay negative for good.
Thank you all for ur interest in replying to my question. :thumbsup:
Yes it started failling later.
As you all know me when I am making a system that shows potentials I am always posting it.
Thanks