Greetings,
Tis a 1 dozen system
Note down in three columns as they come from left to right
A. B. C
1. 2. 2
3. 1 2
3. 2. 3
Etc
Label columns A B and C
By looking vertically down each column, wait until you have 1 dozen that has hit 3 times (doesn't have to be in a row) and then start betting that dozen (only within that column) to hit a 4th time.
Repeat this with all 3 columns. Progression can be what you want as can stop points etc.
Example from random. Org
A. B. C
3. 1. 3
1. 2. 1
3. 3. 1
2. 2. 3
1. 1. 1. bet dozen 1 in column C
3. 3. 3. Bet dozen 3 in column A (not column C as well as already got a bet on)
3. 2. 1. Win in columns A and C. Bet dozen 2 in column B
Hope it makes sense
BW
In your tests or studies have you identified a particular raison why a Dozen/Column that hit 3 times(not in a row) in a given column,must be played.
The probabilty of hitting doesn't change,in my opinion,so it would be the same to play a D/C with any other criteria.
If I'm wrong,please try to explain better your theory
Thanks
Buff
So you're only betting 4 numbers?
Sam
B and TCS
Only bet one dozen
It is the dozen that appears three times in any column. Bet for it hit a fourth time, or a quad, hence the Q
each column has its own progression until the quad hits
Beretta this has as much or as little chance of winning or losing as any other. What my tests have shown me is that a fourth hit is common shortly after a third hit and to counterbalance the losses, I introduced the columns
A session is declared finished once each column has been concluded ie each quad has appeared. I will soon present a finished session
Sorry! Not enuf coffee........
Two mistakes before breakfast... I get it now.
YUK
why are you betting only column A and not A and C after the second trigger, because in the last line you are betting both A and C and both are a win.
So if you got a new trigger then you won't bet the last trigger until there is no trigger and you bet both. :ooh:
Quote from: peauke on Jul 11, 10:40 AM 2012
why are you betting only column A and not A and C after the second trigger, because in the last line you are betting both A and C and both are a win.
So if you got a new trigger then you won't bet the last trigger until there is no trigger and you bet both. :ooh:
Because one session is when a quad is concluded on each column and then we start tracking again.
That's my way. Course you could play it and adapt it differently. Let us know how you get on
I'm not convinced,
It's true that it has as much or as little chance of winning of losing of any other system,as you said.
IMHO more losing than winning
Good luck
Quote from: beretta28 on Jul 11, 11:11 AM 2012
I'm not convinced,
It's true that it has as much or as little chance of winning of losing of any other system,as you said.
In My Humble Opinion more losing than winning
Good luck
Based on what?
I like this system simply because you're betting on a dozen that doesn't appear to be a sleeper. Chances are that a given dozen will hit at least one more time before turning into a sleeper (which case you still win).
What would be a better dozen bet? Even If you wait for a dozen to miss 7 times then start betting on it using a martingale you're still betting on a sleeper, and sleepers have potential to sleep until you bust.
Betting on dozens, it's much safer to bet on the dozens that are hitting and not the sleepers.
Also, like buffalo said: "What my tests have shown me is that a fourth hit is common shortly after a third hit"
I believe this because it makes sense.
Thanks for the share buffalo :).