• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

EC Crackerjack

Started by buffalowizard, Mar 15, 03:37 PM 2013

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

buffalowizard

This is a nice method for all you repeating/matrix/EC lovers

We're dealing with a 5 wide matrix

Choose any EC and jot them down like so:

R R B R R

Now carry on for another row

R B R B B

So together these two look like this

R R B R R
R B R B B

Now looking vertically you can see that there
Is only 1 repeat and that is the first R

That is a trigger to bet that you will have a repeat
in the next row. The other trigger is if there have been
no repeats at all in the last 2 rows such as :

B B R B R
R R B R B

So that's two triggers for a bet in a 5 wide matrix.
It's a method that takes patience so maybe used alongside
Something else but it is one which regularly hits.

Only aim for one hit on a repeater -

"Progression down to your discretion" it's my kryptonite
so maybe someone else can advise

Cheers, BW

buffalowizard

I probably don't explain myself well so here's a sample:

R R R B B
R B B B R no bet here because there have been 2 repeats
R R B B B no bet here because there have been 3 repeats
B B B R R bet next row as only 1 repeat in this row
R B R R R win on second bet on the B

BW

ego

 
I done this method like this ...
You see a repeat bet a no repeat and if you see a no repeat bet repeat.
2
2
1
2
2
.
1
2 W
2 L
2
2
.
2
2 W
2 W
2 W
2 W
.
2
2 L
1 W
1
1
.
1
1 W
2 W
2 W
2 W
.
1
2 W
1 W
1 W
2 L
.
2
1 L
1 W
1
2
.
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1

Now lets assume you would lose like this ...
1122
2211
Then you would not bet until you have a new pattern, so the current pattern could repeat for ever and we would just observe ...
1122
2211
1122
2211
1122
2211
1112 Here is the new pattern and we start our second attack ...

Now i would guess you could use it like a pendulum that goes up and down with hits like Wells system or you just aim for one hit ...
I think it would be best to use some kind of regression method ....
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

buffalowizard

Thanks your thoughts Ego, always welcome

Hopefully it will create some further discussion
and fine tune the method

buffalowizard




The following hundred spins highlight why this is for guys with patience of a block of granite. 1 trigger only here but it won straight away.
There may be something in betting for 2 repeats with a row - I'm going to look into it

R B R B B
R R R R B
R B B R R
R B R R R
R R R B R
B R B R B  TRIGGER
B R B B R  WIN ON 1ST
R B B B B
R R B R R
B B B R B
B B R R B
R B R B R
B B R B B
B R R B B
B B B B B
R R R B B
B B R B R
B R R B R
B R B R R
R B B R R

-