• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Theory Test On Double Streets/Lines

Started by RouletteGhost, Jul 18, 05:58 PM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

No method here yet....the beginning of a theory

How often will lots of double streets repeat in batches of 3, or 4, or 5, or 6....here I will do batches of 5. I will not advocate for any steep 5 double street bet progressions, I just want to see if something can work here

This is a zumma page....

The green is where we would have won in the series of 5 betting for the previous 5 lines/double streets not to repeat. SO first example below, 3 2 4 6 1, next spin we bet all double streets/lines accept for the 3rd double street/line

ALL first try wins....can this win flat bet even with the occasional 0 or loss?


3
2
4
6
1
---
1
3
1
4
3
---
3
4
3
4
6
---
2
6
1
6
1
---
5
4
6
1
1
---
1
2
1
5
1
---
3
4
5
5
0
---
6
3
5
4
3
---
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

If we bet once in the series of 5 then sit out the next 4 spins then begin again

AND

the average win is say 7 wins to every 1 loss, then would yield profit of +2

AND

those 7 wins being in batches of 5, 7 times 5 spin batches, 35 spins total...average 2 units per hour....JUST a theory right now

relax, there is no "we" I am hypothetically speaking  :twisted:
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Drazen

Hi RG

Hope you are doing fine. Is moving to the new house complete now?

Lately I learned from Pri something interesting about lines. Maybe this will be interesting to you too. You just have to find the best way how to exploit that here.

Probability of getting 3 unique double streets or the double streets not being the same is over 55%. Surprising, but that is the truth. So chances of getting 124, 136, etc where all double streets are different are better than chances of getting 121, 333, 223, 144

Maybe this can help?

Cheers

RouletteGhost

thanks drazen

yes completely in now...a journey that was

yes interesting how the DS work....however even if we had an ALMOST guarantee, 5 DS progressions get too steep too fast
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jul 18, 06:38 PM 2016
thanks drazen

yes completely in now...a journey that was

yes interesting how the DS work....however even if we had an ALMOST guarantee, 5 DS progressions get too steep too fast

Based on what you said perhaps after 2 different lines in a row bet the other 4 lines once. Something like that. Since the chances of a differrent one is greater
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Drazen

Yeah but not sure if playing like this will be enough for us. Variance is still tough.

We must do something more I think.

Cheers

RouletteGhost

Quote from: Drazen on Jul 18, 07:01 PM 2016
Yeah but not sure if playing like this will be enough for us. Variance is still tough.

We must do something more I think.

Cheers

Agreed. Cannot be that easy of course

I do fancy the wins in my theory
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

here it is...

Flat bet 1st column only (1st bet of 5 spin series only) yields +4 units

I will be a monkeys uncle, average is 7 wins to every 1 loss...this graphic is about 2 hours real life play taken from zumma

FLAT BET...or if you live dangerously, if lose on first try go for a 2nd try with an increase






the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

More tests to come

I have a feeling im just getting lucky

But liking what im seeing
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Upon further testing

In grids of 5 in a row like above

I do not see a repeat of 2 in a row let alone 3 in a row

Such as

4 5 5 1 2
2 2 5 1 3

Where you bet against 5 decisions back and lose twice in a row due to the repeat, see example above 5 and 1 would have lost, not seeing that with real wheel numbers

O0

What im saying is if you bet against the double street/line that hit 5 decisions back, it seems to me to be rare to have 2 losses in a row.

In fact with the real numbers i have tested i have not seen it

Theory continues
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

denzie

So you put them in a 5 wide matrix? 
As spins roll off our predictions get better

RouletteGhost

And bet it does not repeat the above
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Im not claiming HG

Its just a theory right now

I tested it with first bet in the matrix only as well. Flat bet. Worked.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

I test by only betting the first spin then sitting out the next 4 spins

And i also test by betting every spin against above

First spin only then sitting out the next 4 wins flat

7 wins to 1 loss yields profit even betting 30 numbers

Can the random roulette wheel produce the same double street series every 5 spins.

Nope.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

continuing to test the theory of the roulette wheel not spitting out exact double street/line patterns

in the matrix of 5 across, playing horizontally here is a chart with some red boxes

each red box is a repeat from 5 back (above)

as you can see there is not 2 reds in a row horizontally. so if we did have a repeat of a line 5 spin later, chances are the next spin will not produce another repeat of the line 5 spins back

trigger is a bad bad word here lately but it seems that when we do have a repeating line 5 back and we use that as a trigger to not have a repeat the next spin we have ourselves a decent bet

will the wheel produce:
51362
51362
yes it could but how often?

yes my theory is betting against the line that hit 5 spins back, lol

by the way in the chart below if we just flat bet continuously with no progression that the line 5 spins back would not repeat we would have +21 (not counting zeros). 66 wins, 9 losses. each win +1, each loss -5

obviously some type of zero insurance needed, perhaps a break even insurance




the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-