• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

progression with AP (precognition / remote viewing / clairvoyance)? need help

Started by precogmiles, Oct 10, 03:49 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Steve

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Scarface

Depends on how your precognition works for you.  Does your wins normally come in clusters, back to back?  If so, I would use a positive up and you win progression.  Otherwise, flat bet

luckyfella

Quote from: precogmiles on Oct 10, 03:49 PM 2018
I need a little bit of help from you system and progression advocates. 

If I could guess the correct dozen (1-12,13-24, 25-36) within 5 spins. What progression should I use to maximize my winnings?

double on my loss?
triple on my loss?
triple on winning?
any other suggestion?
There are dz1, dz2, dz3

Long term average win rate of random selection is 1in 3
How has precognition help improve the win rate ?

1 in 5 is a temporary short term outcome due to variance(luck)
Your accuracy will improve itlr
Same for anyone, with or without precognition

And throw in 37pockets with unfair payout, you get a negative edge

Caleb and steve love to tell you the rest
Goodbye everyone - 20/10/2019

Steve

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

luckyfella

Quote from: precogmiles on Oct 10, 04:27 PM 2018
...... the fact that I will always get 1 dozen correct within 5 spins or less?
Have you tested millions of trials on millions of wheels to declare it a fact ?

In short, have you conducted statistically significant rigorous test to declare this a FACT ?
Goodbye everyone - 20/10/2019

precogmiles

Quote from: luckyfella on Oct 11, 01:53 AM 2018
Have you tested millions of trials on millions of wheels to declare it a fact ?

In short, have you conducted statistically significant rigorous test to declare this a FACT ?

I know it is real. Let me make what I am saying a little clearer.

If you (lucky fella) flipped a coin a million times you would expect to get 50% correct.

If I (precogmiles) flipped a coin a million times I would expect to get 80% correct.

It just is.

Your stats do not apply to my reality. I am getting knowledge from somewhere are not. I have an advantage over you.

If you practice and learn to develop your precognition you too can do it. You will go from getting 50% to 80%.

luckyfella

Quote from: precogmiles on Oct 11, 02:27 AM 2018
I know it is real. Let me make what I am saying a little clearer.

If you (lucky fella) flipped a coin a million times you would expect to get 50% correct.

If I (precogmiles) flipped a coin a million times I would expect to get 80% correct.

It just is.

Your stats do not apply to my reality. I am getting knowledge from somewhere are not. I have an advantage over you.

If you practice and learn to develop your precognition you too can do it. You will go from getting 50% to 80%.
Ofc it is real to many posters on here as well

You are saying that you have conducted a million trials on your one coin :thumbsup:

Try a million trials each of different coins
In roulette sense, a hundred wheels for starters

Post below your results pls
Goodbye everyone - 20/10/2019

Steve

Quote from: luckyfella on Oct 11, 01:53 AM 2018Have you tested millions of trials on millions of wheels to declare it a fact ?

Nobody has. Its not something you can run in a simulator. You know this. It is impractical do to this. That's why "proving" it beyond any doubt is difficult. It is not uncommon to have positive results over hundreds or even thousands of trials. But that's still inconclusive because of the volume.

So then you have to look at what additional data we do have, which includes a combination of different tests done by many other people, and in related phenomena. When we do that, it appears to be likely fact.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

precogmiles

Quote from: Scarface on Oct 10, 09:53 PM 2018
Depends on how your precognition works for you.  Does your wins normally come in clusters, back to back?  If so, I would use a positive up and you win progression.  Otherwise, flat bet

My wins are normally like this for dozens.

W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W


The maximum number of Loses in a row is 4. Never more than 4.

luckyfella

Quote from: Steve on Oct 11, 02:35 AM 2018
Nobody has. Its not something you can run in a simulator. You know this. It is impractical do to this. That's why "proving" it beyond any doubt is difficult. It is not uncommon to have positive results over hundreds or even thousands of trials. But that's still inconclusive because of the volume.

So then you have to look at what additional data we do have, which includes a combination of different tests done by many other people, and in related phenomena. When we do that, it appears to be likely fact.
The usage of the word FACT is inappropriate ?

How about provide the specific parameters and specify the conditions how this tests were conducted ?
Goodbye everyone - 20/10/2019

Steve

Quote from: luckyfella on Oct 11, 02:38 AM 2018The usage of the word FACT is inappropriate ?

That's why I said "likely fact". No it's not inappropriate considering the available information.

Quote from: luckyfella on Oct 11, 02:38 AM 2018How about provide the specific parameters and specify the conditions how this tests were conducted ?

A lot of data was posted in an earlier post by precog. Start there. I've also done by own trials which I've published. I also published the results of tests done by another group. There's even more. And when you look at it all, there's enough for any reasonable mind to conclude its likely to be real. But you cant just rely on what other people say, or what you see on TV - which is how most people draw their conclusions.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

luckyfella

Quote from: Steve on Oct 11, 02:49 AM 2018
That's why I said "likely fact". No it's not inappropriate considering the available information.
Start with hypothesis

Conduct statistical significant test

Publish content for peer review

And so on for due process......

A long journey, if you have the stomach for it :thumbsup:
Goodbye everyone - 20/10/2019

Steve

It has been done. Start with the information i suggested.

It's not something like proving repeaters systems dont work, because we can easily prove a negative in that case. Just like we can prove 1 + 1 does NOT = 42.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

luckyfella

Goodbye everyone - 20/10/2019

Steve

Quote from: luckyfella on Oct 11, 03:13 AM 2018
With roulette ?
Really ?

Yes, really. In particular with one study and accuracy enhancement software. I tested the process which was successful, which led to me creating the android apps i published in this forum.  But i haven't yet had time to take it further.

I published the results from the other group.

I'll say it again. I believe this field of study will become the next generation of AP.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

-