• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Major4 FINAL

Started by ignatus, Oct 16, 10:27 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ignatus

Well now, i started out playing "Major4" which was a similar bet to "Zero the hero" (which IS my best flatbet-betselection, so far) Now, the "major4"-bet was exacly alike only zero wasn't bet (but split 0-3 instead) still 5u covering 4 numbers...ok So i thought "this was it" and yes? i was close, playin with a negative progression, everything fine (doubleup after one cycle of 9 spins etc).... BUT then at some point, i lost the whole progressionline , and i had to start Flatbet Maximum bet at the MPR 100u, now, i lost my mind at the same time,:S ...this is crazy! i knew, but strange enough, i could keep on flatbetting this for several hours it seemed? it went up and down, after 3h i was back at the same BR i started from (25000u etc) so, that was that...I took a blow on the "winrate"...

Then i ran a couple of flatbet 10 000spins with the major4-bet, and compare them with my "Zero the hero"-flatbet spins, and....as it showed, Zero the hero, was a better betselection/showed better result. So, THIS is it. Now, "Major4 FINAL" IS played with the "Zero the hero"-betselection BUT with the same progressionstyle (As i did with the original Major4)... I need help with this/ideas/suggestions how to play it ..

Chart 1-10 (Zero the hero flatbet chart examples)....

These are my ideas, (for me/flatbet is out of the question?)  yes, some may like flatbet, i do not...? so it's pretty much up to you HOW you play this betselection Flatbet/positive or negative progression etc...

Here are my ideas about progression with this betselection ;

(1) Negative progression +1u OR DoubleUp after 1 cycle of 9 spins is lost...until reached a new high.
(2) Positive Progression +1u OR DoubleUp after Each WIN, until reached a new high (seems to be a good idea Because hits seems to come in clusters+it was survive longer streaks of non-hits)...

(3) This was my "tweak"/idea of the negative progression Main focus on the 2 numbers that gives most profit (number 0 and number 2) so, 2 number cycle (doubleUP after 17 spins number 0 or 2 NOT being hit, until reached a new high)....This may be the best negative progression since it can survive longer..

Playing 4 numbers Only is something rather "new" to me, really, yes?...AND i think it require more patience/time and normal... Also, I'd say "success or failure" with this system is based *Only* on how frequently the 2 most profitable  numbers 0 and number 2 hits.

That's it!  O0
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

Well? Major Major loss now....0 and 2 seemed to sleep forever...and it happens sometime,

Now, i TRY following ricky's and hermes advice "always wait for a virtual win before bet" (to Avoid these sleeping times, that RUIN your BR/ no matter what progression you use Or flatbet).....

So, for me, really this is the last hope for this one (or else consider it, yet another failure?  :question:

TRIGGER: ANY hit (virtual win) of numbers 0,1,2,3......Start Bet...(1u) DO 18 spins, ...IF numbers 0 or 2 hits during these 18 spins, POSITIVE progression +1u bet and do another 18 spins.... IF hit again (same procedure-->keep the 2u bets) Until no hit of numbers 0 or 2 within these 18 spins, then STOP....

This is the best i can figure. IF this doesn't not work, i give it up... :(
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

Well, sure it "works" but waaaaaaaay wayyy too sloow ....(postitive progression) as above.


No, I consider this a failure. Atleast, i cannot play 4 numbers or less etc. I don't have the patience, no ...really not.
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

-