What about this betselection?

[ignatus]

Alright thanks for your opinions,.. and now back to the lab, if there is any way to improve this bet, that will be less numbers....i have seen this particular movement to be very common; a Y formation opposite the current number hit on the wheel and i tried it before with 11-sector (which also failed) ofcourse i know the outcome of flatbet in the long run, it will always fail (ask superman)

so, what is the conclution of this? the only way to win imho is

1) improve the betselection
2) using patterns
3) using progression
4) playing with less numbers

[Asxetos]

Dealer signature(DS) is a big subject that only a person that have studied the physics of the wheel can understand completely and know IF in the certain wheel and with the certain dealer there is a chance to take advantage of the DS.In other words IF in the certain situation there is a DS or not.

Most ppl think that Ds is everyware..on every wheel and with every dealer.( I see silly ppl everyday in the casino THINKING that they play DS and most of the time are losing as it s natural)
This is because they have never studied "what is happening during a spin" (Rotor speed,ball speed,tilted or leveled wheel,ball jump-scatter).So they can t evaluate IF in this wheel-dealer there is a chance of having a REAL DS and take advantage of it.

But i don t care to analise this subject more in this topic.

Ignatus what you see that is happening from one spin to the next is just RANDOM formations(patterns) that are completely random and you can never rely on them.(exept if there is a very tilted wheel with very heavy ball ,and the rotor has very high frets and the dealer is your 1st cousin and spins the ball in every spin with the same speed LoL..in other words increadeble rare things that can t happen these modern days)

[Asxetos]

Trying to find a system that is based on wheel patterns has been done over and over again for so many years and nothing worked.

So I suggest trying to find-make a system that has no roots on the old losing consepts.
That s what I m trying to do anyway.

[ignatus]

alright,

[Normy2000]

Here are the numbers for those who wish to test it for themselves. (for live-wheels, not RNG!) I don't want to give any false hopes, and it will have a negative trend in the long run when flatbetting, but still the betselection has been proven better than others.....with negative progression is playable, perhaps

0 = 0,1,11,14,20,26,30,32,36
1 = 0,1,3,17,20,25,26,33,34
2 = 2,7,18,16,21,25,24,29,33
3 = 3,13,16,26,27,33,34,35,36
4 = 4,5,9,10,18,19,21,22,24
5 = 2,4,5,10,12,21,24,28,35
6 = 1,6,12,14,20,27,28,34,35
7 = 2,7,8,17,23,25,28,29,30
8 = 7,8,15,18,19,23,29,30,32
9 = 4,9,13,15,19,22,27,31,36
10= 4,7,5,10,12,19,21,23,28
11= 0,9,11,18,22,26,30,32,36
12= 5,6,10,12,24,27,28,34,35

13= 3,9,13,14,26,27,31,35,36
14= 0,6,14,15,20,27,31,32,34
15= 8,14,15,19,20,23,30,31,32
16= 2,3,16,17,24,25,26,33,35
17= 1,7,16,17,25,28,29,33,34
18= 2,4,11,18,21,22,29,30,36
19= 4,8,9,10,14,15,19,23,31
20= 0,1,6,14,17,20,26,32,34
21= 2,4,5,16,18,21,22,24,29
22= 2,4,9,11,18,21,22,30,36
23= 4,7,8,10,15,19,23,28,29
24= 2,3,5,12,16,21,24,25,35

25= 2,7,16,17,18,24,25,29,33
26= 0,1,3,11,13,16,26,33,36
27= 3,6,9,13,14,26,27,31,35
28= 7,8,10,12,17,23,25,28,34
29= 2,7,8,17,18,23,25,29,30
30= 7,8,11,15,18,19,29,30,32
31= 6,9,13,14,15,19,27,31,32
32= 0,8,14,15,20,23,30,31,32
33= 1,2,3,16,17,25,26,33,35
34= 1,6,7,12,17,20,28,33,34
35= 3,5,6,12,13,16,24,27,35
36= 0,9,11,13,18,22,26,32,36

If you have a long spins file to try, use this Rx .dgt file... 

[Asxetos]

i tested 2 sessions for feedback.

session1
2.519 spins= -378 chips

session 2
7720 spins= -2475 chips