Imagine this . . .

[BlackPearl]

Dear Friends,

only a short story about my friend, who was playing on DZ/CL sleepers
with a good BR of 9500,00 Euro in the BM Casino of Stuttgart, South Germany. . .

On tuesday evening at 8pm I told him not to do so and explained,
that he will be dead soon and why . . .   Maybe tomorrow, I told him
and gave advise to by all means stay at home. . .

He thought, he knew better, journied to Stuttgart on Wednesday
and so it went all south :

He chosed to bet on Columns again. . .  After some small winnings
he was catched by a FORTY-TWO (42) Sleeper sequence on his table and all of his BR was gone . . .
It was around 24 hours after my warning . . .

Btw, have You ever heard of a 42 sleeper factor with DZ or CL`s ?
I never did, but it really occured. . .

Have a nice weekend, dear Ones !!!

AND:  Hello Victor. . .   the boyz are back in town !!!

Sincerely,
ROLF   $Ã,§:->))

[chrisbis]

I recall reading here or at another place, of a 12 number bet sleeping for 60 spins!

Its well possible with True random.

Thank goodness for RNG I say!

[VLS]

have You ever heard of a 42 sleeper factor with DZ or CL`s ?

Wowie! That should be a personal record for a pre-conceived formation! I mean, you can find such sequences of a dozen of numbers (12) sleepers on a regular basis if *ANY* combination fulfills it.

Finding it with pre-set numbers is something else, and the layout-based dozens and columns count as pre-conceived ones.

So, for ANY dozen = YES, and you have too a lot of times; it can go on a regular basis.

Pre-conceived dozens = NO! that's a rare event!

Please refer to Bayes' debate on it, he can surely explain better than myself and give you the exact formulae

AND:  Hello Victor. . .   the boyz are back in town !!!

Nice to see you around in our calm, cozy forum dear ROLF

[GLC]

What are the odds that this streak of sleepers would hit at the exact time that he chooses to play and on the exact table he chooses to play on.

BP,  With that kind of luck I'd tell my friend to stay away from all riskys situations for the foreseeable future.

And, whatever you do, don't get our friend Flatino started on the risks of playing dozens/columns sleepers.

G

[F_LAT_INO]

I recall reading here or at another place, of a 12 number bet sleeping for 60 spins!

Its well possible with True random.

Thank goodness for RNG I say!

Yes 54 spins while I was betting on it,plus another
6 spins the dozen didn't show up,but my 128000 was gone,casino Lido
Venice.Money can't bay you happines,but the game can.

[albalaha]

I have myself been victmised by a sleeper of 9 consecutive numbers on the wheel for 55 times in a brick-mortar casino in my last casino trip. Never bet upon sleepers of any kind, be it wheel based or table based. Whoever plays or writes any system with betting upon sleepers is bound to lose. I guarantee this.

[esoito]

And most of the bots I've seen are based on sleepers -- inside numbers, dozens, columns and so on, not having arrived for x spins.

A disaster waiting to happen...?

[albalaha]

They rely upon the misconception of averages. nothing is due to happen in roulette. Anything may keep happening for long while anything may become sleeper for any longer. There is or there can be, no limit of it absolutely. This is the foremost reason of regular losses of players and winnings of casinos. Call it gamblers' fallacy or whatever.