Interesting Thought

[amk]

An interesting thought perhaps.


We are always testing against 1 million spins, we rely on RNG generated stats.


Have 1 million real spins ever been tested??


Have 5000 real, 200 spin sessions ever been tested....


My gut tells me that these sessions could come out positive.........




Just a thought.

[Master_of_pockets]

The point is HOW are those sessions will end up positive?
And if those 200 spin sessions will all end up positive, then the 1M spins will also end up positive.

[amk]

Hello MOP,


I beg to differ.


Not all of those 200 spin sessions have to end positive.

[Master_of_pockets]

I thought that you meant all of those 200 spins sessions can end up positive...

"""My gut tells me that these sessions could come out positive.........""""
This is what you posted.

[amk]

I see what you mean MOP, my bad.


I should have said that the 5000 session test of 200 spins each could end positive.


I think many times we misunderstand each other on the forum due to incorrect explanation, with good intentions and perception of what statements might mean, not all the time but happens and we get of on the wrong foot.


I am leaning towards these overall sessions being positive due to the luck factor. For instance, just an example and not really a good one but can get the point across.


If I went to the casino everyday and played 200 spins for +-10 years I might never see a dozen repeat 13 times. At the moment I feel confident about this because nobody to my knowledge has tested 1 million real spins. That being said phenomena as this has been seen ofcourse, for example 24 reds in Monte Carlo. One thing I am sure of is that not every roulette player will see this happen, infact perhaps only 1% will see it.


This thought can be applied to different methods played in different ways.


Good MM is needed regardless.

[Master_of_pockets]

yes the point is this 1% not to kill the BR and never be able to recoup.

This idea of urs is the 1 of the 1st ideas that ppl thought after roulette made its appearance in the casinos...
and this concept have been tested to death and it can t produce long run profits...

The point of playing 200 spins sessions doesn t change anything.

anyway good luck.

[amk]

According to this logic it does not make sense to play roulette. Why do you continue to play/research? I think this is our gut speaking, that there is a way, will everyone find it, maybe.....

[Master_of_pockets]

I am searching ... yes.
But not the same old recycled losers concepts.

If you have tested a system and you saw that it was a loser....why test it again? or even worst , why play it and lose ur money?

All the systems like martignale or anything else , have been proven losers...so move on and think of new approaches....try to adapt.

[amk]

Ofcourse MOP, my example was not good as I mentioned. If you can find a method which fairs well during a max of 200 spins (a reasonable amount of time most of us are willing to sit around a roulette table) for several hundred live session tests, you have something to work with.

Also good luck wished to you MOP.