2in10 EC method

[vladir]

Ok, very simple, here is the progression first:

1,1,1,2,3,6,12,24,48,96

Either win or loose, follow this progression until you have 2 wins or you end the progression. Then restart.

A loss costs 194 units. But it does not happen very often...

You can play it against the last 10 spins, betting that last 10 spins wont repeat. Of course someday, they will...  I also play this in a french table (0 returns half of a bet)

Another way to play it, is to look for a pattern that happens at least 6-7 times in a row (like a colour repeating 6-7 times). Then bet the oposite for the 10 spins. Kind of a virtual loss.
Just testing this for now, with positive results. No real money yet.

Any tougths on this?

[ego]

Don't play with real money.

[vladir]

Yes, well... I think I can apply that to everything in here ^^

[ego]

Vladir, test any bet selection you have with 1 1 1 2 3 and so on ...
Then you will see that you get a positive net gain.

You see there i no need to win each bet to win overall.

[Let Me Win]

I find all this RECORD X spins, then SELECT Y numbers and BET for Z spins very very tedious if I am being honest.

[iggiv]

how else can u win? if u don't take past spins into account, u bet random. there is no other way to do it. But betting random at the end gives u zero minus 2.7% (the house edge). 1.35% on a french roulette. So here u go. U won't let yourself win like that. Unless u r very lucky. If u r very lucky u don't need any method.

[Turner]

I find all this RECORD X spins, then SELECT Y numbers and BET for Z spins very very tedious if I am being honest.

My view is this
There is only one clue given us. in 37 spins, 24 will hit, 13 won't on average.
You have to look at past spins to utilise that fact.
You don't have to play repeaters just because of the law of the third.
You have to realise there will be Hot numbers. Cold numbers. Clumping of numbers and imbalance.

Very basic understanding of imbalance is realising that the idea that 10 numbers coming out without a repeat is not as likely to happen as a clumping and repeating of numbers. Even in the clumping is at one end without seeing a repeat...like 1,3,14,2,4,6,11,9
that's all worth more than guessing with no history.
I see people guessing without looking at the marquee every week. £2000 bankroll in a little plastic tray, throwing £25 chips all over the table without thinking. I see them later placing 50p chips.
You don't go out the house with an umberella up every day just in case its raining. You look out the window...look at the floor, see if its wet, check out the recent history. The clues are there

Turner

[amk]

Nice post Turner.

[iggiv]

 

[D1]

 
Great post Turner 

[amk]

Nice post D1 : )

[vladir]

good analogy turner. 

[ego]

vladir here is a link just for you, i think you might like it ...

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=10098.0