An important concept!

[GLC]

It's my opinion that all systems are applicable to all payout locations.

Let's take BW's "The Stronger 6"  system.  And I love BW like a  brother    so this is in no way meant to attack him or any of his systems in any way.

This idea should work on any location if it works on any location.  Get it!

Let's take dozens.  We track the dozens until all of them have hit and then we bet on the one that has hit the strongest.

Let's take streets.  We track the streets until all of them have hit and then we bet on the one that has hit the strongest.

Let's take straight up numbers.  We track the numbers until all of them have hit and then we bet on the one that has hit the strongest.

Etc....

Should work on even chances as well.  We track until both even chances have hit and then we bet on the one that has hit the strongest.

It just takes a little longer for the higher ratio payouts to manifest as  a winner or a loser.

Take straight up numbers vs double streets.  If this is a losing system in the long run, it will take much longer for straight up numbers to prove to be a loser than for the double streets to prove to be a loser. 

This is what I've noticed in my testing.  Sometimes it's hard to recreate the exact system on different locations, but if you can, they should deliver the same results over the long run.

Just my theory.

GLC

[Chris555p]

Totally agree with you George.  I also greatly appreciatly bw posts.
The problem is roulette is full of uncertainity hot dozen can go cold at the very next spin.....;
Same with street, EC, Straight numbers,  etc.....
It seems to me that notwithstanding any system a gerat deal of luck, being here at the the right
time is what's required mainly to win the game.....

Cheers

R

[buffalowizard]

I agree with you 100% George, location is ultimately inconsequential (that's a lot of syllables!)
I just personally like the safety and familiarity that DS offer me. That in itself is an illusion, but hen we are all seduced by the great wheel

[GLC]

BW,  Here's my favorite DS system.  Track until all DS have hit except 1.  Bet on that 1 DS at 1 unit for 6 spins.  If it hits within the 6 spins, immediately start betting 1 unit on the farthest back DS.  If it doesn't hit within the 6 spins, start betting the farthest back 2 DS at 2 units each.  If 1 of the 2 DS hits in the next 6 spins, continue to bet the remaining DS at 2 units for the rest of the 6 spins.  If you don't hit that DS in the rest of the 6 spins, add the farthest back DS to the 1 you're betting on and raise both of them to 3 units. etc... 
If you're unlucky enough to get to 5DS being bet, we just increase each DS by 1 more unit every 6 spins.  We never bet all 6 DS.
The only time we reset to 1 DS at 1 unit is when all DS being bet hit within a 6 spins cycle or we reach a new high balance.  When all DS hit, we won't always be at a new high balance, but we still start over at 1DS at 1 unit and try to recover losses a step at a time.

One option is if all your DS that you are betting on hit within a 6 spin cycle and you haven't recovered all loses, you can reset at the farthest back DS at 2 units.  Every time we have no DS left to bet to finish out the 6 spins, we just reset at the farthest back DS at +1 more unit than the number of units we started the last attack at until we finally have a good run and recover all losses.  This is more risky, but it also saves a ton of time trying to recover a bad streak always starting at 1  DS at 1 unit.



GLC