• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

4Selecta system

Started by Robeenhuut, Aug 12, 02:22 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Robeenhuut

Hello

I wonder if anybody tested or played it?  It generated lots of interest on VLS forum few years ago.
Mr Chips reported around 10k units profit in 300 session of around 30k spins in total. Its based on flat betting 3 sets of numbers coming from different groups but with fairly complicated tracking.
I know our restless contributor Sam spent some time on it  ;D
Matt

Stepkevh

i already asked him about it and he said it is'nt realy "wow"

i've read the thread also about the 4selecta system but h*ll it is'nt easy to understand
Just call me Stef ... its shorter then Stepkevh :-)

Robeenhuut

Quote from: Stepkevh on Aug 12, 03:05 AM 2012
i already asked him about it and he said it is'nt realy "wow"

i've read the thread also about the 4selecta system but h*ll it is'nt easy to understand

Actually its not so bad. If you read the first post carefully basically everything is explained except later in the thread there was some more explaining about which group to bet on and when to quit.
But the thread dragged on forever and i guess the author just got tired or.. maybe got busy winning.  ;D
Matt

Colbster

I haven't touched it in years, but it was a passable system and I found it fairly fun to play. I think that Richard's Signum system was the better of the two on his website, but it was difficult to comprehend at first.  Once you got the idea down, that was a great system.  But the 4Selecta isn't a waste of time, no doubt in my mind.

Robeenhuut

Quote from: Colbster on Aug 12, 08:31 AM 2012
I haven't touched it in years, but it was a passable system and I found it fairly fun to play. I think that Richard's Signum system was the better of the two on his website, but it was difficult to comprehend at first.  Once you got the idea down, that was a great system.  But the 4Selecta isn't a waste of time, no doubt in my mind.

Yeah

I had a brief look at Signum but generally I'm not a big fan of outside bets except maybe parlay bets or positive progs.  4Selecta was not that difficult to grasp for me. :D
Matt

TwoCatSam

Signum actually made my head hurt!  I just gave up.

4Selecta seemed to work for me, but it was beastly slow.  What got me off it was Mr. Chips came up with a modification during my testing.  I just hate that.  I'm a "one horse" person.  Never change during the race.

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Robeenhuut

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Aug 12, 10:02 AM 2012
Signum actually made my head hurt!  I just gave up.

4Selecta seemed to work for me, but it was beastly slow.  What got me off it was Mr. Chips came up with a modification during my testing.  I just hate that.  I'm a "one horse" person.  Never change during the race.

Sam

Yeah

I went through a whole thread and he made some changes regarding a dominant group after a while. It was one the systems that could not be played on autopilot and understandably most people hate that  ;D   

Regards
Matt

-