Test my newest method

[Ralph]

Whatever bet selection a number can sleep for long. This time I did in a way I have been trying before.
Bet one the first shown 2 repeat. Bet one straight up, and one at  line  at  the number.
In case of zero, the four number bet.

Did a misstake, saw my bankroll was fast depleting, down  700 in a few spin. By misstake I have put a 100 unit chip under a 1 unit, repeating the bettings, No wonder the drawback.

Moved the 100 chip to Doz and play to get the drawback to zero. Did with some surplus, which shows for the total session.

This time (as lines are under the law of third as well) I got some chips from the line bet, until a hit on the number. No long sleeper this time. I progress only on the line bet.

366 spins
Won  1179

Total  7271

[Ralph]

This time I bet on a repeating number and the line. Some went easy, but one had longer sleep, both the line and number. Needed two hits on the number and some more on the line to turn plus.

Win  381

Total  7652

[Ralph]

I look for repeating numbers. All bets repeat, and a dozen which has all theire numbers allready shown, may repeat better than the three dozens on the layout.

So I spin until  12 numbers shows. Bet one unit on each, if lose bet 2 units, add a unit until a hit.
If a hit reduce the bet two units. Play until no units left or you got some winnings.

Switch to 12 new numbers.

Did 60 spins.

Won 484

Total  8136

Attached  the spins except first tracking using EC.

[Ralph]

Session 13, Yes 13. Very scary, went back 6000 units, the game could ended here.
Recovered with smaller profit, according to betsize, but decide to just save the bankroll,and
quit.

Same method as previous.

Won  129

Total  8265

[Ralph]

The repeaters I look for  this time I was trying to hedge. The number, a split, a street, a corner, a line, a dozen and an EC.  Number 6.

Very hard down 5000 units, but dispite risky progression (upp until winning) I got to habour.

Win.  3218

total  11483

[Ralph]

Trying the previous method once again. Went better the stake rises, but soon got a good hit.

Won  2866

Total  14349

[Ralph]

RFH I lost all in the bank. We are in fun mode, so it is easy to add more money. I added 10 Euro to recover the loss.

This kind of playing is risky, but can in lucky situations turn 1000  to 100000.

I continue the play using additional 1000 total input  to bank is 16100 units. I lost 16000+ the previous winnings.

Do now as any addicted who can find the money.

The problem were solved won catch up all the losses and got 380 plus.
This is very lucky, normally 1000 will not do.

Total is  14789

[TwoCatSam]

Ralph

Are you through with this thread?

Sam

[Ralph]

Sam!

I may do some more later, I allways testing repeaters, and if I got some new thoughts I will post it.

[TwoCatSam]

I look for repeating numbers. All bets repeat, and a dozen which has all theire numbers allready shown, may repeat better than the three dozens on the layout.

So I spin until  12 numbers shows. Bet one unit on each, if lose bet 2 units, add a unit until a hit.
If a hit reduce the bet two units. Play until no units left or you got some winnings.

Switch to 12 new numbers.

So may I assume the above are the rules?

Sam

[Ralph]

Sam1
Yes that's one way, I sometimes go for seven numbers.
But I think 12 straight up repeaters use to hit more than a dozen at the layout table.
The bankroll must be bigger as you stake 12 units at the time.

The game is hardly possible if the table min is an Euro.
many times it is despite 0.01 chips, its Euros on the table.

It can go to 50 Euros in some cases. risky!!!

But it is a relation between risks and award, You can lose, but with some luck it can win
more than you ever can think.

I play safer most of the time, but sometimes I take risks, and hope for a good go.

One way is to play flat, and increase the bet if you have won, it will not accumulate the same,
far from, but you are in control of losses.

If you win and add two, you go break even if you lose, but you know sometimes the hitting are frequent, and if you play and got three hits i a row, the winning  are some chips, and if you lose, the cost is as you lose once. 1,3,9.

[TwoCatSam]

Ralph

I am going to try to program my robot to bet like that and see what it does over 100,000 spins.

Sam

[Ralph]

Yes, and I think you will find it losing. If you divide the large number of spins in sessions, which is how we play. Say a couple of hundred spins, you will probably find losing days and winning days.

As with lucky days we can win as much we want, we play until we fell a sleep, and
worse time we stop due to scary events.

I real  life we do not play millions of spins in one go.
It will anyhow be very interesting to see.
If the loss is less then house edge, then its a signal repeaters works better than random betting,
or layout dozens.

[TwoCatSam]

Ralph

The idea behind a 100,000 number test is merely to get an idea of what the "worst case scenario" would be.  It has truly helped me in my quest.

I never, never expect a system to pass.  I just want to know when I may be entering the RFH and what decision I need to make.

I only drive 70 miles per hour, but I want to know the road is good 100 miles ahead.

Sam

[Ralph]

I have to drive a bit slower, my sight is not as before, so I am bound to a car which in fact is a moped. A small kind of car driving 46 km/h. 

Its of course very cheep in fuel, nearly 40 km/litre.

I can not translate miles and gallons.

Yes lets see the worse and the best, in a long run.