An effort to help some members get out of the worst gambing fallacy

[Master_of_pockets]

And I also agree with speed that a Mod should have a proper understanding of roulette.
For example Steve that is the owner has a correct understanding on roulette and he knows everything about GFs....that s how a Mod should be.

Iggiv isn t in the position to be a Mod.

It s like working in a factory that builds cars and the supervisor doesn t know where the wheel of a car is.

[iggiv]

MOP i wonder if u ever learn to be a normal member of a forum  tolerating other opinions. Now there are 2 of u. Waving this "flag of knowledge" and bringing nothing but troubles here.

[ddarko]

The owner of this forum is never going to get rid of Iggiv, like him or loathe him just accept it guys.

[Master_of_pockets]

Ofcource I am tolerating the GF thinking of some members.
But I can t tolerate a Mod to be deep covered into the GF....it s like working as a mecanical engeneer and never seen an engine.

[iggiv]

MOP if not me u would have probably be kicked out of here before. U already were kicked from here under other nicks. But i can't see a sense to tolerate your b/s here anymore.

Moderating is not about roulette knowledge, this is first.
second -- u have no idea how much i know about roulette.Actually if u just
read a 1/10 of books on roulette that  i did u would probably be much smarter than u r.
The problem is u can't absorb this info. U can only listen to yourself. And tell others how
much u know.

[ddarko]

Actually if u just read a 1/10 of books on roulette that  i did u would probably be much smarter than u r.

Would you care to name the books in question?

Looking forward to your reply 

[iggiv]

Franco Scobletti,  Russel Barnhart, John Patrick, Brett Morton to name a few.
This list is not full.

[ddarko]

Franco Scobletti,  Russel Barnhart, John Patrick, Brett Morton to name a few.
This list is not full.

Looking at those names I get the feeling it's the other author's name's that are the important ones.

oh well not to matter

[iggiv]

Well, u see, people which are proud of their "roulette education", usually did not read any. Important or not.

And gambling fallacy is not what they think it is.

link:://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacy

Hit-n-run is not included into "gambling fallacy". On the contrary -- hit-n-run comes from very clear logic. Realization that no method can win consistently. Realization that roulette is negative expectation game. And result of long roulette analysis with real data and different methods.
Something that those so called "roulette educated" guys don't like as they don't like books on a subject.

[Master_of_pockets]

GF is anything that is opposite of the maths of roulette.

[Skakus]

We are all operating within the confines of GF. The only one's outside this are those are usng advanced physics based bet selections, and flat betting those selections.

For the rest of us roulette players, playing a game with negative expectation, we are trapped in the world of GF. Make the most of it or shut up and get out. 

[iggiv]

the main gambler fallacy is "due effect". Belief that if we have many of the red now, then soon we will have lots of black. That's simple explanation of gambler's fallacy.

MOP calls gambler's fallacy anything he doesn't like
Actually i feel that his crusade against "gambler fallacy" has some personal roots...
Desire to draw attention...

[Master_of_pockets]

"""Well, u see, people which are proud of their "roulette education", usually did not read any. Important or not. """

One person can read 100 books of a subject and not understand anything..this doesn't mean that he learned the subject.

""We are all operating within the confines of GF. The only one's outside this are those are usng advanced physics based bet selections, and flat betting those selections.

For the rest of us roulette players, playing a game with negative expectation, we are trapped in the world of GF. Make the most of it or shut up and get out.  """

I agree but GF and GF have difference,
The worst GFs are the ones that aren t taking the maths of roulette siriously.(Hit and RUN)
The less bad GFs are the ones that don't take the randomness of roulette siriously and having the hope that a special pattern in randomness can exist....

"""Actually i feel that his crusade against "gambler fallacy" has some personal roots...
Desire to draw attention..."""

this is an other reason why iggiv shouldn t be a Mod....because he is making wrong conclusions all the time and because of this he isn t able to apply justice.

[iggiv]

"One person can read 100 books of a subject and not understand anything..this doesn't mean that he learned the subject."


that's a nice way to admit  the simple fact of ignorance  on the subject. That's a typical answer of people which don't want to know reality and can see only what they wanna see. No reading even a single book on the subject, but rather teaching others

[Robeenhuut]

--My friend at large,
  These days since only playing airball 500 euros,
other past days when I travelled and play B&M
casinos.....40-100 the.....but not any longer as can't
last nights...years

So Flat whats a minimum bet in your online croatian casino? I understand that you
stopped playing B&M casinos.  Is your main method still a sector or split method?