Bet Selection or No Bet Selection. That is the Question ?

[Drazen]

There is no point in arguing what is more important - HE or fluctuation/dispersion. HE just puts you at disadvantage from the start and you need a good fluctuation/dispersion to be ahead.

Oh there is my friend. You are very wrong about what you just said.

You can also reduce HE using dispersion somehow , so as number of expected losses from some point, but if you just remove zero without monitoring dispersions, you will still have same dispersions as with zero on the wheel. Well same in terms of no possibility beating it with progressions, enormous non handable draw downs and touching table limits with it.

Regards


Drazen

[Robeenhuut]

Oh there is my friend. You are very wrong about what you just said.

You can also reduce HE using dispersion somehow , so as number of expected losses from some point, but if you just remove zero without monitoring dispersions, you will still have same dispersions as with zero on the wheel. Well same in terms of no possibility beating it with progressions, enormous non handable draw downs and touching table limits with it.

Regards


Drazen

Hola Drazen

I guess you misunderstood my point. HE is just a fixed number and having 0 or no 0 in the mix does not affect any probability of meeting as you call it dispersion.  Reducing HE means just having better  than average result than expected loss in a large statistical sample.

Regards

[Drazen]

Hmm well I guess then i got something wrong

Cheers

Drazen