Variation on 'million spin' 3 Parlay progression system

[Le_Chiffre]

I've been playing around with a system that stemmed from Matush 77's 'this may stand a million spins' system/topic.

Ive been playing live for about a week just before xmas and it's doing very well without any major nasty scares.

The rules:

(we bet everytime, we DON'T wait for virtual wins)

#We will ALWAYS bet the colour that just won (red or black) with 1 unit.

#If the bet wins then we parlay 1-2-4 and reset.

#For losing bets we stay at the same start level unit (1) for 3 losing spins (go back to 1 unit if lose in the middle of the parlay), then we progress up to +1 unit higher if we haven't completed a parlay sequence by then.  (so up to 2-4-8).

#We do this until our bank roll reaches a new END OF SEQUENCE high (don't stop half way through a progression even if it's a new high, only when it's a new high at the end of the parlay sequence).

#If the balance isn't at a new high at the end of the parlay sequence (this is for when we've progressed up to higher levels) we drop down a level (-1) and start from there as before....UNTIL A NEW HIGH IS REACHED AND THEN RESET TO 1.

[Le_Chiffre]

this is working nice guys.  £1,200 won so far with £5k bank roll (not needed, thats just me).

[Le_Chiffre]

ok, so i got up to just under 2k and then.....it decided it didnt like me anymore and went against me....i gave up and closed down +500 overall so still better than nothing....but nearly -1500 down from where i was....bit to high to be called draw down for me.

[nitrix]

Same results here. I did some testings and paste 150% to 175% profits, I would begin to lose money (twice my starting bankroll) until the system recovers. And those losses go exponentially huge...

Thanks for posting it though, it's an interesting mix of parlay and martingale.

[Le_Chiffre]

no problem nitrix.  glad it interested someone.

[ego]

This make me think of Brett Morton's way to parlay, he's favorite.
Thanks for a nice topic.

But he also use MM and sequential attacks.
Accept loss targets and win targets with safety nets.

[Le_Chiffre]

thanks for the reply ego.  do you know what sort of tweaks would perhaps make this better (as you know of a similar system)?

thanks