• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Absolute Control Betting System

Started by GLC, Aug 26, 04:37 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GLC

Here's a simple betting method that can be used if you want to control how large your bets get.

Begin by using a series of three.  We are going to bet the next 3 spins at 1 unit each.  Let's say we win the 1st bet.  Put that unit in the winners pot and start over with 3 bets of 1 unit on the next 3 spins.  Let's say we lose the 1st bet -1 and win the next 2 bets +2-1=+1.  Put that unit in the winners pot and start over with 3 bets of 1 unit.  If we lose 2 of the first 3 bets it means we ended that 3 spin series with a loss, we add both lost units to our 3 each 1 unit bets we will make next.  That would be 2+3=5.  Divide the 5 units into 3 bets as close to even as possible.  Larger bets start 1st.  In this case our 1st bet would be 2, our 2nd bet would be 2 and our 3rd bet would be 1.

At any time we are +1 or higher, we start over with 3 each 1 unit bets.  In our example let's say we lose our first 2 unit bet and our 2nd 2 unit bet and win the 3rd 1 unit bet.  We ended our series still minus, now add our 4 lost units to the 3 units we are going to bet on the next series and divide into 3 bets as evenly as possible.  4+3=7 which will give us a 3 unit bet and 2 each 2 unit bets.  Continue in this manner until you are at a new high balance, then start over at 1.

This can be adapted to any situation.  If you find yourself on a really bad losing streak and you are betting unit sizes too large for your pocketbook or personality, you can increase to a 4 bet series instead of a 3 bet series.  Or 5, 6, 7, etc...

In other words, let's say you are adding 35 lost units to your 3 each 1 unit bets for the next 3 bet series which means bets of 13 units, 13 units and 12 units.  If you want, you can go from a 3 bet series to a 5 bet series and you add 35 to 5 units divided into 5 bets of 8 units each.  8 unit bets are much easier to make than 13 unit bets.

You can also reduce the 1 unit per bet in a series to 0 units until you reduce the size of losses so the losses don't rise at such a high rate.  You can decide that when you get down X number of units, say 15, you will only bet previous losses without adding the 1 unit per bet.

Increasing the number of bets in a series is just like Lanky's "brake" concept in his "6 point divisor" betting system.  This system, like the "6 point divisor" can be played with EC's, Dozens and Columns, Dbl Streets, Corners, etc...  Just takes a little adaptation.

This is not an infallible system, it's just a method to control how large your bets get during a prolonged losing streak.  Remember, prolonged losing streaks can be unbelievable at times.  Even flat betting can take you into a hole with no way out.

All comments, criticisms, tweaks and at-a-boys are more than welcome.

Friend at large,

George

P.S.  I adapted this idea from the betting method outlined in the Einstein system in the 302 roulette systems.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Jordan

The best thing with this concept is to watch what was the loss after the last 3 bets ,then +1(because when we will win all 3 we need to be +) and devide the resault by 3
eg we are now - 8 in BR. so we do this:

8+1/3= 3
so we will bet
3-3-3.

Nice MM!good on you GLC!
I respect you because you are very gentelman and very creative...now let s hear other opinions to see if we will win in the long run :)

Jordan

We can play this with the bet selection to bet always the last Colour
We will have eventually 3 same colours in a row,so we will be +......

Now the tests will show if it is  a   safe system......

In theory all are nice ;)

Ur way GLC is a little more aggresive...so this means better profits but the bets will grow Bigger after the losses.....maybe ur way is better...i don t know
The good thing is that we have 2 versions....

can we alllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll test it with the 2 versions to see what is the best?

Jordan

I tested the idea with GLC rules.

I was struggling to make +1 chip at more than 70 spins!!!!
In some point I was down more than -50 chips!!!

So my modification would be also BAD!

GLC

Quote from: Jordan on Aug 27, 11:25 AM 2010
I tested the idea with GLC rules.

I was struggling to make +1 chip at more than 70 spins!!!!
In some point I was down more than -50 chips!!!

So my modification would be also BAD!

Don't give up.  All betting systems lose at some point.  I'll bet if you played those same spins with any other system, you would lose as well.

Did you ever go to dividing by more than 3?  Maybe 4 or 5 or 6 to slow the decline down a bit and then when you are having a little better luck, decrease the divisor back toward 3.

Actually, the more I think about this, I guess it's not a heck of a lot different than the 6 point divisor.  Maybe it's a little easier to understand.

G.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

sheki


sheki

and what bankroll you need to have chance to any success ;)

GLC

Quote from: sheki on Jan 21, 11:48 AM 2013
Is This still playable?




Sheki,  This is a very aggressive progression method.  You must have a large bankroll.  300 units at least.  Or set a maximum size bet and when you reach it end that attack, take the loss and start over at 1 unit.  By maximum size bet, I mean something like 10 units.  Anytime you lose a 10 unit bet, that's the end of that attack.  Start over with a new attack.  As you will see, you will have a lot of start overs.  But better to not have to bet too large a bet and risk losing it all in one bad run.


Better, I think, to stay with bread winner type system, or flat bet parlay.


Here's the dilemma.  If you have a slow progression, it can take forever to pull out of a drawdown.  But, if you have a steep progression, you need a large bankroll to survive a large drawdown.  With steep progression, you don't need so many wins to losses, but a really bad run can hurt quite a bit.  With a slow progression, you can keep from going in the hole so far, but you need a prolonged stretch of wins to losses to get back to profit.


Six of one, half a dozen of the other.


Progressions are just different ways of doing the same thing.  Find a series of wins and losses and test different bet progressions to see how they differ in their performance.  It's eye opening.


GLC



In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Ralph

A stretch progression is useful if you get better hit rate in future, a stepper if it hits soon. Both can eat any bankroll if unlucky.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

sheki

Thanks a lot guys.Gegore, can you give me a link with flat bet parlay for even chance, beacause I can't find it

GLC

In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

sheki


-