The Gizmotron Progression for 2/1 bets in Roulette

[Gizmotron]

lOOK giz, WE HAVE HAD OUR DIFFERENCES.  And we're never likely to be buddies.  Let me tell you one thing, what you are laying on here now was tested by myself years ago.  Why didn't I use it? Because it didn't stand up like the 4th game.  I settled on the way I play the zone for one reason, and one reason ONLY.  It works.  And you are risking 91pts for a game you may only have to play once a month if even that.  Not 300 points or so everytime you play your version.  I don't want to argue or dis-credit you Giz, you're obviously an intelligent person.  But I have studied this thing for so long.  I know what I am talking about when it comes to this strategy.  Please try to understand that.

I think it's important to document your comment here. You might try to delete it. We would not want that to happen. Thanks for your comments.

[GLC]

1. ) I wait two spins after each zero, to see if a new single appears.


2. ) When zeros start hitting within ten spins of each other or when they repeat.


3. ) I run 300 spin tests.  But I would end with 25 to 30 units.  as a good goal.  A loss is 80 units.  Maybe winning 80 is a good idea.

Gizmo,

I have tried your system on 750 spins so far and have had only had 1 loss.   I have been using your exact rules, except for the zero factor but they weren't an issue in my loss.   I've only tested the dozens so far.   I will go back and test the columns to see how they do on the same spins.   

If this works out to 1 loss on average every 300 spins, depending on how many repeats we have with both dozens and columns, it's still a winning system.

Unlike the WhiteKnight, I'm not even close to being ready to throw in the towel.   Every system has losing stretches.   We just need to test this one to see if they're far enough apart to leave us with a positive balance.

And as with any system, we should have an adequate bankroll to withstand a negative start if it should happen before we start accumulating the casino's $$.

GLC

[Gizmotron]

GLC, what I've been seeing is a few more two losses as of late. A two loss might average out to breaking even. It might be a little ahead or a little behind. But for the last week it's been averaging one loss for 300 spins. It will be interesting seeing it used by several different testers. Eventually there will be a general consciences.

[ScoobyDoo]

I don't know if I have the worst luck in the world or what....

On my first try I got the following:

WLLLLWLLLLWLWW

Here are the spins:

Trump Plaza, Las Vegas, Nevada, October 10, 1999

31 8 4 24 24 32 26 0 31 28 10 9 29 22 0 0 30 33 2 9 1 11 21 17 23 36 16 00 27 21
29 26 25 15 34 22 10 11 11 14 15 00 34 7 10 30 27 8 1 13 8 25 11

I guess this doesn't happen too much, right?

[hamsup_sotong]

1.) I wait two spins after each zero, to see if a new single appears.


2.) When zeros start hitting within ten spins of each other or when they repeat.


3.) I run 300 spin tests. But I would end with 25 to 30 units. as a good goal. A loss is 80 units. Maybe winning 80 is a good idea.

Many thanks giz

hamsup

[Gizmotron]

I don't know if I have the worst luck in the world or what....

On my first try I got the following:

WLLLLWLLLLWLWW

Here are the spins:

Trump Plaza, Las Vegas, Nevada, October 10, 1999

31 8 4 24 24 32 26 0 31 28 10 9 29 22 0 0 30 33 2 9 1 11 21 17 23 36 16 00 27 21
29 26 25 15 34 22 10 11 11 14 15 00 34 7 10 30 27 8 1 13 8 25 11

I guess this doesn't happen too much, right?

That's very interesting Scooby. What made you select spins from October 10, 1999?  To have you select that set of spins as your first set of spins is an incredible and significant circumstance. Anyone might think that you have the worst luck on planet earth at that moment. Does this happen to you a lot? That might be far more interesting to discuss than this progression.

[buffalowizard]

I tried it and did very well for about 300 spins without a single loss and then 3 losses within close proximity.
Lucky it was paper testing

[ScoobyDoo]

GIZMOTRON,

You asked what made me decide to choose those spins....It was quite "random". I have a list of decisions from several casinos.

The group of decisions I chose to use to test your method just happened to be the first casino and group of decisions at the top of the first page.

I definately didn't look to try to find decisions that would defeat your method. I was hoping your method would work.

I was just surprised to have two losses right off the bat like that...especially that close together.

[Mistarlupo]

link:://rouletteforum.cc/testing-zone/tested-gizmotron-progression-for-21-bets/

[Hermes]

This method is betting the chops on dozens or columns and the idea is half of my system 4x4 drive, therefore only half so good. The progression is hazardous far away from smooth Leveller progression and never HG, but never stop trying to do better is the way to real Holy Grails.
Cheers Hermes