lifetime progression

[eddy35]

link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=101

Here is the RouletteX code for the same way of playing, only with 5 spin frequences instead of 10.. It really has potential!!

[shaquille3]

I've tested it on 1 million spins on RX with starting BR of 2500 units and a base bet of 2 units. I tested this in mind with a low BR on a low limit table with no zero, but applies to a bigger BR as well. In my case the BR was 25 Euro with 0.02 Euro base bet. But you can start with 2500 Euro with 2 euro base bet.
I did more than 10 1 million spin tests and from them only 2 were busted but at the very start because of the low BR, but once the BR kept growing it was unstoppable.
The way I had my system is block of 7, bet only on red and a table with no zero, to limit the house edge.

Starting BR: 2500 units. Ending BR after 1.000.014 spins: 405668 units

Interesting fact from the statistics: max consecutive reds was 18 and max consecutive blacks was 19. So with martingale starting from 2 unit bet the size of the bet would be: 524288 with 1048576 total invested ( assuming that there was no table limit ). This is for the guys that say that martingale is a good system.

[ausguy]

Marty can be made viable with stop losses. Can your RX tester accomodate stop losses say starting at around 40% along your progression line ? A no bet win is the trigger for the next level money bet. Stop losses continue the same up to the 2nd last level. The limit last level bet is either sink or swim. Switch back losses on stop loss bets are the danger.  40% SL,WLWLWLWL etc. kills the BR.

Stop losses take care of long strings of losses. 1,048,576 total invested would therefore not occur.

[kingsroulette]

This is nothing else but cyclic super martingale where in cycles of 10 spins, if u r not lucky enough to get more and faster wins than losses, you will lose a fortune. This is based upon a presumption that in any cycle, if we get ahead with wins (be it first attempt or 10th), we will get +1.

Let's see cycles, for instance
               LLLLL  LLWWW   -2
               LWLWLLWWLL   -6
               W                            WE GET A NET PROFIT OF +1 IN THE THIRD CYCLE HERE, WITH MAX BET 7 UNITS ONLY. I have read a similar method somewhere but it was suggested to go with the winner EC of a 10 spins tracking cycle. I mean we track 10 spins and say want to go with Red/Black, check which one has hit more. Go for the highest hitter EC for two cycles of 10 spins. Bet higher hitting EC in every cycle with your losses+1. Go with the winners than losers.


               

[kingsroulette]

If we have a sticky EC and first two cycle fails badly, like

LLLLL LLWLW =-6, we will bet 7 units per bet in next cycle

LLWLL LWLLW=-28, we need to bet 29 units per bet in next cycle

LLLLW WLLWL  NOW IT WILL GET TOO UGLY TO TRY FURTHER.

NOT BETTER THAN PLAYING MARTINGALE AFTER 10 VIRTUAL LOSSES OF AN EC

[kingsroulette]

nteresting fact from the statistics: max consecutive reds was 18 and max consecutive blacks was 19. So with martingale starting from 2 unit bet the size of the bet would be: 524288 with 1048576 total invested ( assuming that there was no table limit ). This is for the guys that say that martingale is a good system.

WITH JUST 2500 CHIPS IN HAND AND PLAYING 10 STEPS MARTY AFTER 10 VIRTUAL LOSSES, MARTINGALE WOULD KILL YOUR 10 MILIONS SPINS. MAX BET 1024.

SIMULATE THIS IN THE SAME DATA AND LET US KNOW.

[doubledime]

I've tested it on 1 million spins on RX with starting BR of 2500 units and a base bet of 2 units. I tested this in mind with a low BR on a low limit table with no zero, but applies to a bigger BR as well. In my case the BR was 25 Euro with 0.02 Euro base bet. But you can start with 2500 Euro with 2 euro base bet.
I did more than 10 1 million spin tests and from them only 2 were busted but at the very start because of the low BR, but once the BR kept growing it was unstoppable.
The way I had my system is block of 7, bet only on red and a table with no zero, to limit the house edge.

Starting BR: 2500 units. Ending BR after 1.000.014 spins: 405668 units

Interesting fact from the statistics: max consecutive reds was 18 and max consecutive blacks was 19. So with martingale starting from 2 unit bet the size of the bet would be: 524288 with 1048576 total invested ( assuming that there was no table limit ). This is for the guys that say that martingale is a good system.

Since most tables have at least a "0", can you run this with a "0" table?  Thank you

[Azim]

I've tested it on 1 million spins on RX with starting BR of 2500 units and a base bet of 2 units. I tested this in mind with a low BR on a low limit table with no zero, but applies to a bigger BR as well. In my case the BR was 25 Euro with 0.02 Euro base bet. But you can start with 2500 Euro with 2 euro base bet.
I did more than 10 1 million spin tests and from them only 2 were busted but at the very start because of the low BR, but once the BR kept growing it was unstoppable.
The way I had my system is block of 7, bet only on red and a table with no zero, to limit the house edge.

Starting BR: 2500 units. Ending BR after 1.000.014 spins: 405668 units

Interesting fact from the statistics: max consecutive reds was 18 and max consecutive blacks was 19. So with martingale starting from 2 unit bet the size of the bet would be: 524288 with 1048576 total invested ( assuming that there was no table limit ). This is for the guys that say that martingale is a good system.

The numbers look to good to be true.

If you don't mind, can you share the rx code?

[shaquille3]

The RX code is above my first post. I just changed the way it bets to only on red and block of 7. I will do a test with a european roulette. This system is very slow and if played with cents its not worth the time. But if played with 1 euro and with a bigger BR its a very good system on the long run.

[kingsroulette]

Risking 1 million spins to earn 1 unit is the craziest example of money management. This progression is a failure.

[cheEsteban]

Thanks for the the scoop!

I am curious about how it works with Baccarat.... i guess it depends on the how closely lost bets can cluster, right?

[denzie]

what do we find here... something for the bot?

[Elupuki]

what do we find here... something for the bot?

I guess the thread is dead.. I'm still using this progression from time to time though. It really has something