35-to-5 Roulette System

[malcop]

Hi All,

I'm new to this forum, I was tying to tidy up my hard drive and came across "35-to-5 Roulette System" that I bought a few years ago.

The author is C.  L.  Woodfaulk a. k. a Roulette Queen.

Not sure why I did not use it.

Did some checking and can't find the website any more.


Thanks

malcop

[VLS]

Welcome! I recall to have seen that method before.

You may start by telling the fellows the basics of the 35-to-5 method

[malcop]

OK, I will try without giving to much away.

You will only be looking at the most recent 10 numbers to show on the marquee.   Starting with the oldest number, you will work your way back through the more recent numbers looking for a repeat (any number that has hit at least twice).   You will locate the that key number on the chart for whichever wheel you are playing.   You will check the five number combo of this number and verify that 3-4 out of 5 numbers in that combination have shown in the last 10 spins and then play that key number's seven number combination.   You will always be playing seven numbers for a series of up to 7 bets according to the following progression.

1 1 1 1 2 2 2

Hope this helps jog your memory.

Thanks

malcop

[Kattila]

I have posted that system in Downloads area, can find it there.

Cheers.

[Twisteruk]

Thanks Katt !

And I think that gives it all away  

[VLS]

OK, I will try without giving to much away.

You will only be looking at the most recent 10 numbers to show on the marquee.   Starting with the oldest number, you will work your way back through the more recent numbers looking for a repeat (any number that has hit at least twice).   You will locate the that key number on the chart for whichever wheel you are playing.   You will check the five number combo of this number and verify that 3-4 out of 5 numbers in that combination have shown in the last 10 spins and then play that key number's seven number combination.   You will always be playing seven numbers for a series of up to 7 bets according to the following progression.

1 1 1 1 2 2 2

Hope this helps jog your memory.

Thanks

malcop

Thanks! 

[esoito]

Thanks, Kattila.

I guess if a product is no longer sold or available then "...without giving to (sic) much away..." isn't likely to compromise the author's income.

I took 3 years to produce an ebook on fixing PCs. Tried to sell it on the web...Within 6 months it was readily available on most of the PDF sites -- for free.

So I've abandoned it altogether, and am all the wiser for the experience !!

[malcop]

Thanks, Kattila.

I guess if a product is no longer sold or available then ". . . without giving to (sic) much away. . . " isn't likely to compromise the author's income.

I took 3 years to produce an ebook on fixing PCs.  Tried to sell it on the web. . . Within 6 months it was readily available on most of the PDF sites -- for free.

So I've abandoned it altogether, and am all the wiser for the experience !!

I agree if it is no longer available then no harm in posting it.   I will post it in the download section.   Mine seems to be different to yours in a few ways look for it in the down load section and let me know what you think.

Thanks

Malcop

[esoito]

@Malcop

Oooer -- both dated 2003 and yet, as you say, different.

A quick look reveals obvious layout differences.

A careful read of both will reveal any content/methodology differences.

We'll see, hmmm?

Anyway, a belated welcome to the forum!!

[Are you 50% of the brains behind a particular sniper baccarat system?]

[esoito]

Oh dear...here we go...several MAJOR differences between the two versions.  

One works with 13 spun numbers; the other with 10.

One refers to 'pivot' numbers; the other to 'key' numbers. But in both cases those numbers are different in the worked examples, because of the 13/10 difference.

I'm left wondering why both were released in the same year, without any version numbers, or mention of a previous version.

I get the feeling it was produced on-the-fly.

Whole thing smells decidedly fishy, I reckon...

[malcop]

Oh dear. . . here we go. . . several MAJOR differences between the two versions.   :(

One works with 13 spun numbers; the other with 10.

One refers to 'pivot' numbers; the other to 'key' numbers.  But in both cases those numbers are different in the worked examples, because of the 13/10 difference.

I'm left wondering why both were released in the same year, without any version numbers, or mention of a previous version.

I get the feeling it was produced on-the-fly.

Whole thing smells decidedly fishy, I reckon. . .

I have to agree it dose not make sense to me.