Old, but not forgotten

[ignatus]

i post 3 systems i've invented in the past, that i like and that imho are working pretty well.

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=14538.0

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13849.0

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=12656.15


cheers

[ego]

 ignatus i will be polite and tell you my personal opinion

1. i don't belive in bet selection with progressions that go all in
that is old thinking and the most common thinking

the issue is that you might win 10 20 30 40 50 60 sessions in a row or even more, but when the method fail you give all the money back

2. where ever i look so do i only see option 1 that i mention above, why don't members post about flat betting or positive progressions
i tell you why, because the hardest thing you can do is to produce tight winning strikes and not many can do that

3. more members should focus on LW-Registry where you can flat betting or play regression up & pull

4. also stop testing system the traditional way, there is no point running bet selections with progressions that go all in, they all lose in the long run
we know that and should stop testing that way

if you want to test a method, then try to win two session out of three, where the two winning sessions overcome the third loss
do that on regular basis and you have a winner

5. the next level for you ignatus is to understand that flat betting and progressions is the same thing
you can create methods that flat betting and get the same results as you would use a method with a progression

For example ... here i use a positive progression ... regression up & pull ... same thing as flat betting and up & pull when you hitting strikes
can i do that,,, then you can do that with out using negative progressions

[ignatus]

ok thanks ego

[rouletteKEY]

If it were me and I had to focus on any of your 36,412 posted methods...I would look at your "Jugglers" as the starting point...and tweak until they became the ending point as well. 

Like Ego said... lose the crazy progressions.  I personally combine both negative and positive progressions.  But I always test flat to hone the bet selection...then tweak it out with the money management (stop losses, progressions, etc) to minimize my exposure and maximize the gain (that's all theory you know  )

[Turner]

If it were me and I had to focus on any of your 36,412 posted methods...I would look at your "Jugglers" as the starting point...and tweak until they became the ending point as well. 

Funny you should say that...I said this to Ignatus in July



Personally, I would still be on " the juggler"

Yes thats right, 12 months ago, and I would be still on it. Best thing you ever did.....tweeking, testing, improving.

[ignatus]

well, i be damned. is there nothing else than repeaters and hotnumbers that you professionals play?... 

[nowun]

well, i be damned. is there nothing else than repeaters and hotnumbers that you professionals play?... 

Think about it, there is a reason they are popular.

[rouletteKEY]

well, i be damned. is there nothing else than repeaters and hotnumbers that you professionals play?... 

that pretty much sums it up

the grail is exposed for all to see