Double the fun

[Mudiru]

I wanna try this system with real money and see how that goes, but there's no reply in this thread for almost 2 months. What are the results atlantis?

[atlantis]

Hi mudiru,

It's a good progression that will work well with a half-decent dozen strategy. If you can find such a one that will deliver a consistent strikerate then it is worth pursuing. Therein lies a quandary... Which single doz selection strategy out of all those that exist will give you this??
Solve that side of the equation and you're quids in!


A.

[jarabo002]

It would be very positive that any member could encode this system and check it. In this case, in my opinion, it would not take bet selections or triguers, perhaps choosing a dozen and see what happens.

I don't belive too much in bet selections.

[GLC]

GM,  Thanks for resurrecting this system.  Wow!  When I re-read the whole topic, I scratch my head and wonder exactly what happened that we just all of a sudden dropped this system?  I can't for the life of me remember why I stopped using it.  All I can come up with is that some other system must have been posted that caught everybody's attention and we all ran over to it.  When it finally tanked, like they all seem to do, we had forgotten about this one.  Short memory loss.

I didn't keep exact records, but I remember that I never lost a session playing to +10 units on my 25 cent airball machine.  And I played a lot of sessions.  At least 30.  That's about +300 units.

Maybe the grinder factor put us all to sleep.

Atlantis, TCM, Buffalo, Warrior, guys did anyone have a streak from hell that scared you off this system?

GLC

[atlantis]

Yes - it is interesting topic resurrected.
I still use basic GLAT progression, George; and can be applied when you come to try a promising single doz selection method.

Here is a session just now with real numbers tested thru RXtreme using a very simple selection criteria:
Simple one -  bet the DBL (decision before last) - in other words the penultimate recorded dozen for each EACH SPIN.
Stop when in reasonable profit!

A.

[Tamino]

It is not how much you win but how little you lose. That philosophy produces winners. Go positive  and never chase losses.

[jarabo002]

GM,  Thanks for resurrecting this system.  Wow!  When I re-read the whole topic, I scratch my head and wonder exactly what happened that we just all of a sudden dropped this system?  I can't for the life of me remember why I stopped using it.  All I can come up with is that some other system must have been posted that caught everybody's attention and we all ran over to it.  When it finally tanked, like they all seem to do, we had forgotten about this one.  Short memory loss.

I didn't keep exact records, but I remember that I never lost a session playing to +10 units on my 25 cent airball machine.  And I played a lot of sessions.  At least 30.  That's about +300 units.

Maybe the grinder factor put us all to sleep.

Atlantis, TCM, Buffalo, Warrior, guys did anyone have a streak from hell that scared you off this system?

GLC

Hi GLC

What version of this system did you use to obtain this results?

thanks!

[GLC]

I use the progression detailed in reply #60.

For a bet selection I use what I call a roaming method.  I use 3 selection systems that are very easy.  1) Play for the last hit dozen to repeat.  2)  Play for the farthest back dozen to hit.  3)  Play for the penultimate dozen to hit.

I check the last 5 results.  Which ever method would have won the most times, that's the one I use for the next bet.  If the results are 2, 2 & 1, I check the last 6 results to determine the dominant selection method.  If I get 2 of each, I go back 1 more result.  You will never have to go back more than 7 results to have a dominant selection method.  As a matter of fact, you can use the last 7 results and be done with it.  Although, I find that 2,2 and 2 aren't that common.

This may seem a bit confusing, but with practice, it's really fairly easy.  This method catches a dominant method.  It also jumps off an old dominant and onto a new dominant quickly.  The killer is when they're switching back and forth with no dominant emerging for long enough to get some wins.

I know there's no mathematical reason for it to work and I'm not saying it's infallible.  It's been working for me is all I can say.

I know I'm preaching to the choir when I say to be sure and test this selection method before risking real money on it.  But, just in case a new convert is reading, I had to say it. 

Take note of Greenie Meanie's comment.  It can happen.

GLC