• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

looking for a single dozen/column and a double dozen/column progression

Started by RouletteGhost, Sep 06, 10:42 AM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GLC

Nice one Ausguy.

Rich, here's another take on the Guetting Progression.  I had forgotten all about it.

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13771.msg118472#msg118472


Enjoy,

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

RouletteGhost

im liking this guetting progression..............

on a red/black streak or on a baccarat banker/player streak you could clean up!
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

ausguy

Guetting developed his play for the game Trente et Quarante, an old time French even chance type of card game with some similarites to Baccarat.

This is why the Guetting Progreesion (GP) can be applied to many other EC games & as already demonstrated modded to even suit double Doz/Col betting.

Also Rich it may be of interest for you to look at "win-max.com" via GOOGLE at their GP charts & in particular their relative comparisons to many of the popular progressions & the benefit of the GP in larger loss trends. I suppose a person could say, 1st you have to stop the losing before you can start winning ?


RouletteGhost

Ok I will check win max

After doing research someone on another forum claims he passed the allan wilson acid test by using the guetting progression combined with blackjack basic strategy. Bj basic strategy lowers house edge to .5 percent
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

GLC

As with all positive progressions, the obstacle to overcome are all the false starts that cost you units while you're waiting for the big winning steak to show up.  If it were the obvious answer, we wouldn't be trying a variety of negative progressions.

Test thoroughly before risking money.  Although with positive progressions you go into the hole slowly so there's plenty of time to decide to throw in the towel without getting caught having to decide if you make the next huge bet or take the large loss.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

RouletteGhost

ausguy im not having luck finding the GP charts please link me
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Colbster


ausguy

Yes correct it's win-maxx- My error sorry.

I get it on google by : 1. type in  "guetting progression" 2. google lists an array of items & at or near the top should list "The Guetting Progession Win Maxx" & then you're there. Best of luck.

RouletteGhost

see image. win maxx loves guetting
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

GLC

Don't be deceived.  The win/loss order has been cherry-picked to highlight the GP's strong points.

Not trying to discourage the use of this progression but it certainly has it weaknesses.  It's weaknesses fall way short of the weaknesses of a negative progression, but they're still there.

Positive progressions like this one are the only ones Brett Morton recommends in his book "Roulette, Play To Win".  He gives the reverse labby and Parlay betting 9 out of 10 points.  He doesn't critique the Guetting Progression which is odd, but I suspect he'd give it 9 out of 10 also.

Personally, when I can force myself to play a positive progression, I prefer the reverse Labby.  I always start with ten 1's and stop any time I win 5 units or lose my 10 units.  It can be a real exercise in patience if you always start each line with ten 1's, so, being the negative progression maniac that I am, I increase my 10 units by +1 after a 10 unit loss and I decrease my 10 units by -1 after I win 10 units.
You can still find yourself in a pretty deep hole this way, so test thoroughly.

Cheers,
GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

-