System deserves a thread. Thank you Mogul, credit goes to you

[RouletteGhost]

this is a unique system

it is based on even chance bets, here we will pick High and Low

record the past 10 spins, record each of the 10 spins as HIGH or LOW

then bet against it will martingale, in sets of 5, if you win before the 5 bets is over that session is over then wait until the 6th spin and start again in the 2nd session of 5

preliminary testing on celtic live casino faired well

i played flat betting the 10 in a row against the last 10 and won, and i did sets of 5 martingale and won

seems solid thus far

example
previous 10 spins HIGH LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH--------------HIGH LOW LOW HIGH HIGH
you would bet     LOW  HIGH  LOW  LOW  LOW---------------LOW HIGH HIGH LOW  LOW

in sets of 5 you would do a marty, on a win stop and wait until spin 6 then start again with the next 5. or what i did, simply flat bet 10 times in a row

here it is

How To Beat Roulette**the Sequence Breaker**

hI To all this is my first post on this forum, and I hope my experience and success in the game of Roulette will be useful to others. I have two strategies to share with you that have brought me great success over the last decade playing roulette. The first I am going to introduce to you is called THE SEQUENCE BREAKER. And it does exactly what the title says.

I have been studying roulette for over 20 years and tried countless strategies. The most common reason that they virtually ALL fail in the long run, is they do not understand that Roulette is random, what happenned 10 spins ago isn't likely to happen in the next ten spins. One of the few TRUE WAYS to beat this game is to turn that randomness in YOUR FAVOR. Enter the sequence breaker. Here are the basics and staking plan I use.

Example, you record 10 spins in a row for the high low even chances. Here are ten spins from a session I played (and won) today.

H--H--L--H--H- -H--H--L--L--L--This is your starting sequence 10 spins we devide them into

two sets of five. This is our blueprint sequence we now bet against this sequence occurring again.If we achieve a win on the first attempt. That game is a lock (over). We then repeat this on the second set of 5. So below is the real results I achieved.

L--L--H--L--L- -L--H--L--H--L--This is the result of the next 10 spins. In both games I got

the perfect result. With the win coming on the very first spin. You have two ways you can play this. 1, you can keep that first tens spins as your blue print and bet against it for a maximum of 6 games. Or 2, you can take each NEW set of 10 spins and bet against them in the next 10 again for 6 games ONLY. Each way is equally rewarding.

The secret is not to play to many games in a session. I recommend 6. The reason is obviously at some point USUALLY around the 10th---12th row. You will get a 5 spin repeater. Although you can win as many as 50---60 games before losing 1.

STAKING, you have 2 options.

ONE you can be SUPER-STRICT and only bet on 4 steps 2----5. You have step 1 as a virtual spin and it has to repeat the same as your blue-print spin or there is NO BET.

STAKING FOR THIS WILL BE 1,2,4,8---TOTAL RISK 15PTS

TWO you jump straight in and start from the first spin going 1----5 if necessary. THE DRAWBACK is you have to risk an extra expensive step

STAKING FOR THIS WILL BE 1,2,4,8,16---TOTAL RISK 31PTS

It is essential you keep the sessions short and sweet 6 games maximum. I have won over a 100 sessions in a row doing this. You will of course lose at some point. BUT, you should win at least double what you lose. Immediately after a losing game I will double even treble my stakes on the next 2 games and recoup some of my loss quickly. This strategy has made me a small fortune. It really works. I have played it for the last 7 years, And as long as you are patient and not too greedy. Can accept 6 points at a time. You can win 60 times plus to every loss.

Any questions are welcome. Sentinel...

[RouletteGhost]

i dont know the science behind it

its crazy

its random

it works

[Chris555p]

Well done; The rumour is that Sentinel and JL is the same guy.....; The style of writing seem
to be similar.....IMO JL has some great ideas that just need to be refined to make
his systems infaillible.

[falkor]

I tried something similar to this, but the amount of losses in a row (max) was equal to betting any random sequence. I do believe past spins affect future spins, but I don't think it applies to "pattern breakers" from the testing I have done.

[ADulay]

this is a unique system

No, not really.

record the past 10 spins, record each of the 10 spins as HIGH or LOW
then bet against it will martingale, in sets of 5,

This may not end well.

preliminary testing on celtic live casino faired well

All system "preliminary testing" fairs well or we wouldn't continue to test it!

seems solid thus far

Yes, it does appear to be "solid" when you first look at it but I can assure you that the "10 in a row" that you're not looking for will show up soon enough.

In my case, I was a relative newbie to baccarat and thought that there is no way that the same 10 decisions could show up back to back.  All I had to do was record the last ten decisions and bet for those same 10 decisions to show up exactly in the next ten decisions.

It happened TWICE in one week of sporadic play!!!

So, take it from a bit of experience.  Those 10 "exact opposites" will show up.

AD

[superman]

So, take it from a bit of experience.  Those 10 "exact opposites" will show up.

You can almost hear the next question.

"yeah, but how often"

As often enough as it has to to remove all your winnings+, as JL found out on ALL his concoctions

[Turner]

You can almost hear the next question.

"yeah, but how often"

As often enough as it has to to remove all your winnings+, as JL found out on ALL his concoctions

Yeah, but HAR counteracts all those issues

[RouletteGhost]

HAR?

[Turner]

@ Rich
HAR = Hit and Run
The concept being that you can dip in and out of random and it makes some difference.
I never subscibed to it
If you play 6 spins and win 1 unit you run. Take a break....returning later or go to a different table.
You leave on a random number and come back to a random number.
Doesnt matter if you wait a week
This argument blew up to biblical scales when debated in the past.
Im a non believer

[Chris555p]

With a high quality bet selection hit and run is not necessary
Profits will be made even after several hours of continuous
playing.

If the bet selection is inadequate HAR will not save......

[rouletteKEY]

With a high quality bet selection hit and run is not necessary
Profits will be made even after several hours of continuous
playing.

If the bet selection is inadequate HAR will not save......

yep

[vladir]

Hit and run is just delaying the inevitable. It *could* only work if we know when to hit and when to run with a good accuracy as to avoid losses and be present at the winnings. But we never know both with the required accuracy...