Dane´s JAW OF THE THIRDS

[Dane]

Could you add a negative progression to make it more profitable?

As you might have noticed, I am
NO NEGATIVE PROGRESSION ADDICT.
So I am certainly not going to do such a thing.
We should not follow any Ghost
or any Troll for that matter
We might as well ask:
Could you add a POSITIVE progression to make it more profitable?

[RouletteGhost]

If you are up or even flat betting then a negative progression poses no significant risk?

[soggett]

As you might have noticed, I am
NO NEGATIVE PROGRESSION ADDICT.
So I am certainly not going to do such a thing.
We should not follow any Ghost
or any Troll for that matter
We might as well ask:
Could you add a POSITIVE progression to make it more profitable?

what do you think of using +1/-1 in cycles? got a sweet +45 units in 200 spins on a test run just now

[RouletteGhost]

I fully understand a successful system requires no progression. However, that being said if this is a solid system that yields profit or breaks even then a +1 -1 progression should yield more profit

[TwoCatSam]

Hello Mr. soggett

On the progression....do you mean up one after a loss of a game or single spin?  Loss of a game is when two streets have each had two hits and you weren't a winner.

Sam

[RouletteGhost]

i like the idea of playing this with double streets the best

why?

the chances of 6 unique double streets hitting in a row is very very low and very very rare

using a negative progression until a repeat you are just about guaranteed to profit

if 1 hits place chip on 1st double street then if 22 hits chip on double street 1 and double street 4 etc etc

add another chip each time

[Chris555p]

@Agesta - Thanks for the example.

Cheers

Chris

[Dane]

More than 1300 views now

In the examples of reply #59
DS was chosen.
In my examples of reply #9 and reply #13 (page 1)
I also showed you something else.

When choosing a chance we also should consider this:

AFTER LEAVING ONE GROUP WITH THREE PARTS WITHOUT A HIT
THAT PARTICULAR GROUP MAY COME AND COME AGAIN
BEFORE THE END OF THE SESSION.

After leaving area 1-18 (and DS there) these EIGHTEEN numbers may come more times
before 19-36 has appeared twice.

Street 1, 2, 3/  4, 5, 6/  7, 8, 9/ 10, 11 12.
Accordingly  we might have left area 1-9 without a hit after two appearances there.
Before any  of the other three GROUPS has appeared twice,
the left area with NINE NUMBERS can come Again and Again.

Split (cheval):
1-4, 2-5, 3-6/ 7-10, 8-11, 9-12/ 13-16, 14-17, 15-18/  19-22, 20-23, 21-24/  25-28, 26-29, 27-30/  31-34, 32-35, 33-36.
We might have left DS 6 (and its three mentioned splits or cheveaux) without a hit there.

Before ending the session the abandoned area with SIX NUMBERS may come again and Again to our disadvantage!

Plein, Straight Up or single numbers:

Without a hit on No. 3 right after 3, 1 we are leaving area 1-3.
Even these THREE NUMBERS can come Again and Again before any other street has showed twice.

There is nothing like stating the obvious.
This ought to be obvious now! 

[soggett]

Hello Mr. soggett

On the progression....do you mean up one after a loss of a game or single spin?  Loss of a game is when two streets have each had two hits and you weren't a winner.

Sam

Hello TCS

i ment after a loss of a game 

[RouletteGhost]

There has to be a progression that works with double streets

If you place a chip on a double street as it shows you will have a repeat before 6 unique doublestreets occur. It is a rare event for 6 unique to occur in a row

[RouletteGhost]

Soggett are you playing numbers in streets as they show or are you playing double streets?

[Dane]

There has to be a progression that works with double streets

If you place a chip on a double street as it shows you will have a repeat before 6 unique doublestreets occur. It is a rare event for 6 unique to occur in a row

There have to be other threads for this old ideas!

I repeat:
We should not follow any Ghost
or any Troll for that matter 

No repeat?

This is off-topic. But let´s just have a look at 5/6x4/6x3/6x2/6x1/6 = 0.054320987654.
Really amazing to see those digits in that order, I must say.

[RouletteGhost]

Im referring to agesta's double street version of your idea Dane. His idea would work well with a slight progression of plus 1 minus 1

I would only flatbet your method, no progression

[Dane]

Im referring to agesta's double street version of your idea Dane. His idea would work well with a slight progression of plus 1 minus 1

I would only flatbet your method, no progression

If that´s the case, RouletteGhost,
we should stay focused! Please explain
how exactly  agesta´s version differs from my method.  Please take your time!

In the meantime I´ll be thinking about
a famous mathematician throwing a die four times in the French Age of Enlightenment
Such a probability reminds me of something with DS 

[soggett]

Soggett are you playing numbers in streets as they show or are you playing double streets?

agestas way, playing the double streets