• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

newbie here: could someone test this over a large amount of spins

Started by stuggie, Jan 10, 07:05 AM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stuggie

So im new here be nice :)

This is a bet selection i have made through reading various forums and joining various ideas so i can't take credit. The scoring system however was all mine.

For some reason (i dont even know) its giving good results in the short term.

Anyway, i bet:

2u on 3, 7, 15, 20, 26, 28, 32 and 34 (winners +38u)

1u on 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, and 35 (buffers/bonus, +2u)

Total bet = 34u

Winner pays 38u. Loser takes 34u

We play for +1 then end as i play 10 per u. And 380 aint bad(explained below)

I play two seperate result tables winners/losers and buffers.

A result on a winner = +1, a loser = -1

Starting the count at zero obviously

So we spin and get 28. Thats +1. Go home a winner.

We spin and get 5. Loser. Thats -1. So back to zero.

But if we spin and get 4. Thats a buffer/ bonus 2u. Until or unless we reach 17 buffers which equals 34u. Which i would substitute to cancel out any minuses.

Sorry if this is just a mad mans ramble or something someone else has already came up with. Like i said im new

Stuggie.







GLC

Welcome to the forum stuggie. 

Let me be the first to tell you that your post has too many holes in it for most of us to determine exactly how you're playing.  The +1, -1 is confusing because a loss results in -34 units and a win on a 2 unit bet = +38 and a win on a 1 unit bet = +2.  So what is the relationship between +1, -1 and the true results?

Just a little more explaining and I think we'll all be on the same page.

How short is the short term?

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

ego


There is a new roulette forum witht he name betsofware cc
But is not a common roulette forum - it is for coding and programming bots and systems

You can get any of your ideas coded at that forum for a cheap penny

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

stuggie

Hi GLC

Think of zero as the centre, +/-1 refers to being 1 mark/notch either side of zero.

Its not reffering to +1/-1 unit.
Its just a scoring system to manage my balance at -3 its a loss of 102u thats my stop loss.

Target score is +1. Which equates to 38u profit.

I find that wins far outweigh losses although THEY DO HAPPEN.

This is  a work in progress.

Im finding it tricky to explain but i hope this helps.

Stuggie




stuggie

And as for +38/-34

If one of your 2 unit bets hits it pays out 72u which i count as +38(72-34u bet)

If a 'buffer' hits it pays 36u(+2)

If a loser comes in you lose 34(-34)

Any ideas to tweak it so as to lessen the risks?

Thanks
stuggie

GLC

Okay, I understand what you're doing.  34 units is a lot to risk for a single spin.


I like to think of it this way.  If each number from 1 - 36 and then zero hits just one time in the 37 spins, we have 8 numbers that net us 34 units each = +304 units and we have 18 numbers that nets us 2 units each = +16.  304 + 16 = +340 Units.

On the other side we have 10 numbers that costs us -340 units.  That balances out the +340 units.  But we also have a zero that costs us -34 units.  That's the casino's rake.

What if we bet 3 units each on 2 corners and 7 units on an even chance.  That gives us 8 numbers that we win +14 units on and 18 numbers that we win 1 unit on.  We've cut our risk from 34 units to 13 units.

Or the simplest is 1 unit on 2 corners and 3 units on an even chance.  8 numbers wins us 4 units and 18 numbers wins us 1 unit.  Now our risk is only 5 units per spin.  We sacrifice the large win on one of the 8 numbers in the 2 corners.

Just thinking with my fingers.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

stuggie

Makes sense glc. Thanks for your input.

I agree with your math it makes perfect sense.

Maybe i should rethink this.

(Swarzenegger voice) ill be back! :)

Stuggie

GLC

I don't mean to be negative, but this idea has been tried with bets pretty close to this one and they didn't turn out so good.

It doesn't mean you can't come up with something worth looking at.  Your interesting perspective on how to view the two different sets of bets is intriguing.  Looking at something from just a small shift from normal can lead to a whole passel of ideas.  Whether they'll amount to anything good has the odds stacked against it.

Keep posting,

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

stuggie


-