• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

I was wrong.... Sorry

Started by tezza12, Jun 02, 06:27 AM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tezza12

So it would turn out i have not cracked RNG, not unless the casino IS obviously cheating. One of my theories was that any given DS can't be missing for more than 55 spins, so to wait 35 spins, then bet using a 25 step progression, thus taking us to 60 spins, i always believed and others agreed that the maximum (ish) would be 55, so we are giving ourselves a 5 spin window for error, well, you guessed it, today, it happened, a DS (sixline) went missing for 73 spins, have i ever seen this before, no, will i ever see it again, well..... it nearly did, very quickly after it went to 71 spins (thankfully i was not betting this time)
I have tested this for months over millions of spins, and never before did it go above 52, yet in a 30 minute window today, twice it went in to the 70's, which begs the question, are the casino now cheating. Thankfully i am still up 500+ units, but took a big hot of some 230+ units this morning. It appears, i was wrong.

tezza12

Quote from: tezza12 on Jun 02, 06:27 AM 2015
So it would turn out i have not cracked RNG, not unless the casino IS obviously cheating. One of my theories was that any given DS can't be missing for more than 55 spins, so to wait 35 spins, then bet using a 25 step progression, thus taking us to 60 spins, i always believed and others agreed that the maximum (ish) would be 55, so we are giving ourselves a 5 spin window for error, well, you guessed it, today, it happened, a DS (sixline) went missing for 73 spins, have i ever seen this before, no, will i ever see it again, well..... it nearly did, very quickly after it went to 71 spins (thankfully i was not betting this time)
I have tested this for months over millions of spins, and never before did it go above 52, yet in a 30 minute window today, twice it went in to the 70's, which begs the question, are the casino now cheating. Thankfully i am still up 500+ units, but took a big loss of some 230+ units this morning. It appears, i was wrong.

ati

The rng did not cheat, you were wrong from the beginning.
A double street is nothing more than six random numbers. There will be always more than six unhit numbers after 55 spins, and sometimes those unhit numbers will all be in the same double street.
I've just run a quick test of 25k rng spins, and one DS missed 60 times in a row.

tezza12

Quote from: ati on Jun 02, 07:42 AM 2015
The rng did not cheat, you were wrong from the beginning.
A double street is nothing more than six random numbers. There will be always more than six unhit numbers after 55 spins, and sometimes those unhit numbers will all be in the same double street.
I've just run a quick test of 25k rng spins, and one DS missed 60 times in a row.

I fully agree it is not unusual to see 6 numbers missing for more than 60+ spins, the theory was those 6 number would  not appear in the same DS due to the randomness of positions. Like i said, i was wrong.

TwoCatSam

Not often someone says they were wrong.  I admire you for that.

(Course some do:  Proof comes to mind.)

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

ddarko

I'm with Sam on this, big of you to man up & admit it..... :thumbsup:

O0

tezza12

Thanks, and at least i have still come out with a + figure, so not to shabby, and has made me think about a different strategy, will make a new post for you to take a peek at.

-