......PATTERN FLOW.......

[Chrisbis]

Hence the need to run many many tests, with all available numbers till we have say 100 charts/graphs and can compare them side by side (well, I mean overlapped, and take the average)

Then we would see, where (if required) the change would be needed/desirable.
But I get your drift.

(So the custard is on me eh!)..... love triffling around me!

[amk]

Thought I'd bring back PATTERN FLOW.......

Anybody like Topcats graph?

Hope Chrisbis is still out there or did he get band some how?

[iggiv]

Chris has not been banned or something, he is welcome here as always,  and i see he visits the forum sometimes, but it's been a while since he posted here, november last year. My guess is he is very busy with something else.

it would be interesting to see what he is up to those days and if he is gonna be back to roulette stuff again.

[nayan007]

Hi amk,

It will be good if you bring back the pattern flow and I like Topcats graph 

[ewarwoowar]

Anybody playing this at all?

[sturrock]

I've just had a play. Think I understand it?

[sturrock]

Just to check I have this right, Your first bet is dozens and second bet is columns then back to dozens etc.  Thanks

[TwoCatSam]

Speaking of the graph only and ONLY my opinion--I have not been up the mountain!

It is very common for a graph to show a loss of the initial gain.  You go up 100 and then down 110.  The killer is the graph that goes up to 1000 and then down to -1000.  (Exaggerample!)  This means a loss of 1000 and you could have started at the high point!  Would/could and yes, should you continue when you've lost 1000 of Mama's money?

TwoCat

[TwoCatSam]

Record dozens first then columns alternating in two separate groups............


spin 1:

dozens      columns
2

Spin 2;

dozens       columns
2                 3


spin 3:

dozens       columns
21               3

spin 4:

dozens       columns
21               32   = trigger is two numbers in each group...........


Now we bet that the patterns do not continue/flow for both groups............

Betting against 2121  and 3232 forming...............


spin 5:
dozens        columns
212              32     = progression 1 loss..........


spin 6:
dozens        columns
212             321   = win on progression 2

OK, had a second look (or is it the first?) and AMK's idea.  By Jove, I like it.  Have some questions about the alternation, but the Cat's graph makes is worth studying more.

So,  the big pregunta, why does everyone abandon ideas that seem to have merit and chase Mr. Li?

"One, two three--Look at Mr. Li
Three, four, five--Look at him jive"

It's HUMOR.

Sam

[Chrisbis]

I'm here!! lol

[reveal]Recently getting back to reading what you guys have been up to[/reveal]

I see my reveal doesn't work these days

[ewarwoowar]

Omg!
Could it be?
Is it really?
Chris? Is that you?! 

[Chrisbis]

Tis moi

How goes it Edd ?

[amk]

Just goin with the flow and found this thread was up again after not checking the forum for some time.

Perhaps something to PATTERN FLOW?

After seeing a vast amount of roulette stats, logic tells me we are just betting any random number between 1 and 80 due to it being a 4 step 2 dozen progression.

But the hit rate is 1/208?

Am I willing to bet the next ten 5000 game sessions I test on random.org will have similar results? 

Could turn $160 into $2000-4000 live, then never play the method again?

But why not continue on? whenever I go below the units I won during the first ten 5000 spin sessions I will then stop playing the method for good? Should I continually keep increasing my BR by $1000 along the way I make a $800 unit loss my new win/loss goal.

There is going to be a time this happens, might be after 5 10 5000 spin sessions but you will still be in the plus. Might be during the first ten 5000 spin session, but I doubt it.

Certain methods are strong to a certain point for some strange reason.

Then you have to tweak them a little......

Anyway : )