• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Vaddis Holy Grail

Started by RFMAXX, Aug 20, 03:35 AM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

buffalowizard


Proofreaders2000

Exactly Buffalowizard.  More and
more I think Vaddi is a scam artist.

Mako

See? That's why you should be focusing on Ben's work  ;)

Proofreaders2000

Bigbroben has his style and I have mine.

RouletteGhost

Anyone who claims to have a HG using a mechanical system and gives “clues” is a scam artist. Someone with mental issues who likes dragging people along

Vaddi is one of many. Falkor. Many others

Guys like johnlegend WERENT scam artists because they laid it all on the table. You could play it if you wished. No hidden agenda.

The whole vaddi thread is a waste

There’s your daily dose of truth.

The only threads worthwhile are threads where the strategy is laid out in detail and people can play it if they wish. Not this nonsense.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Proofreaders2000

Alright.  Since people think there
is "something here" here, here goes...
==============================
Procedure: Bet the newest spin-value in
each column and it's Vaddi pair once + Zero.

Stop on a win or after five consecutive misses.

Example: 15,26,1 (newest spin-value)

Bet 1,2:  26,27:  15,16,  0:     1.) 8(x)-7

Bet 1,2:      8,9:  15,16,   0....

buffalowizard

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 11, 05:21 PM 2019
Anyone who claims to have a HG using a mechanical system and gives “clues” is a scam artist. Someone with mental issues who likes dragging people along

Vaddi is one of many. Falkor. Many others

Guys like johnlegend WERENT scam artists because they laid it all on the table. You could play it if you wished. No hidden agenda.

The whole vaddi thread is a waste

There’s your daily dose of truth.

I've been saying it for ages...Tell everyone everything or nothing at all.

By giving breadcrumbs, you are proving that you have nothing of substance.

Lead people along and never tell them the real juicy 'secret sauce' - what the hell is the point of that!!

Like an amazing film that is just coming to a big conclusion and then the credits roll.

"We must find the answer ourselves" they say. "Keep looking, you will find it, if you dig deep enough" they add.

Well we all bow to you master, but we are not worthy and cannot use your bloody 'clues' to discover the holy grail.
Imagine if every method in this forum was like this?
I hail Proofreaders, Ignatus, Katilla, RG, Superman and dozens of others who aren't so narcissistic that they need to act like a Pied Piper and lead a band of merry followers down the lane.

There, rant over

Sparks

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 11, 05:21 PM 2019
Anyone who claims to have a HG using a mechanical system and gives “clues” is a scam artist. Someone with mental issues who likes dragging people along

Vaddi is one of many. Falkor. Many others

Guys like johnlegend WERENT scam artists because they laid it all on the table. You could play it if you wished. No hidden agenda.

The whole vaddi thread is a waste

There’s your daily dose of truth.

The more i spend time on this the more i agree. You either have to be really selfish to claim you have the HG and just string people along or you're just a plain old troll.

There's even a few people on here (who i won't name) I've seen doing the same thing, "look at my graph see how amazing it is, see if you can figure out how i did it." I'm sorry but we've all been putting in the same work as everyone else and SHARING our success / failures.
I would bet any money that those who genuinely have their own HG, wouldn't have it in the first place if they didn't get their idea or inspiration from our work or tweaked someone elses method to make it a HG without telling anyone.

WHEN i discover a HG, I'll make damn sure I'll share it, because I'm not cruel enough to watch people squirm over a pretty graph or breadcrumbs.

To those who do share their methods and insights, thank you. you all provide inspiration and a great service to the community.

Sparks


Turkish4

Quote from: Sparks on Feb 11, 05:32 PM 2019
The more i spend time on this the more i agree. You either have to be really selfish to claim you have the HG and just string people along or you're just a plain old troll.

There's even a few people on here (who i won't name) I've seen doing the same thing, "look at my graph see how amazing it is, see if you can figure out how i did it." I'm sorry but we've all been putting in the same work as everyone else and SHARING our success / failures.
I would bet any money that those who genuinely have their own HG, wouldn't have it in the first place if they didn't get their idea or inspiration from our work or tweaked someone elses method to make it a HG without telling anyone.

WHEN i discover a HG, I'll make damn sure I'll share it, because I'm not cruel enough to watch people squirm over a pretty graph or breadcrumbs.

To those who do share their methods and insights, thank you. you all provide inspiration and a great service to the community.

Totally agree! Same with me! I’ve been testing almost daily different methods at live tables with live dealers and if I get something consistent, I will definitely share!

RouletteGhost

The people who have nothing are typically the people giving clues

Like priyanka for example. It’s a power play. Getting off on controlling others

I’ll never play that game
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Frodo

Maybe vaddi did think outside the box. I do not understand his bet but if he was true,  kids think visually, not in numbers, not in statistics. if the system is easy, it has to follow visual marks.

in any 37 spin cycle, we average 24 hit numbers.  12 doubles 12 singles and 13 unhit. every single time.
My thoughts on his method:

24/3=8  means 24 total hit numbers = 8 numbers per dozen
12/3 =4  means 12 doubles  = 4 doubles per dozen

if doubles hit, focus on catching the singles
thinking numbers as a horizontal line. 37 spaces. there will be no 12 consecutive empty spaces at the end of a cycle.

if singles hit, focus on catching the doubles
to increase accuracy, wait for 8 numbers without repeats than aim to catch a repeat

balance= balance between doubles and unhit (target: 12 each at the end of the 37 spins)

The HG would have to be a continuous process.

lets take 19 spins in. No betting yet. Half of spins from a 37 spin cycle.
how many unhits do we have? how many repeats?
if unhits > doubles, how do we catch the doubles?


The General

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 11, 06:10 PM 2019
The people who have nothing are typically the people giving clues

Like priyanka for example. It’s a power play. Getting off on controlling others

I’ll never play that game

And people like Turbo
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

RouletteGhost

I do not group turbo into what I described.....

he doesnt spend his time in threads like the others i described..he doesnt try to convince...i see him trying to gain nothing...hes just private

these other jokesters spend day after day hundreds of posts trying to string people...dont see turbo doin that
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Bigbroben

I don't think that by finding ''something that happens every x spins'' is enough to overcome the house edge.
Say you play a 9-number system.  Oh this and that happen every 4 spins.  No it's not.  It happens every 4 1/9th spin.  Do not round down.  Or hey my 4nr systems gets a hit every 9 spins on average.  No it's not.  It hits every 9 1/4th spin.  Do not round down.

I actually dare anyone to find something that hits every 36u laid down.  Even then it's a breakeven.
Or I could even challenge to find a system that hits less than every 37u laid, a system that costs more than 37u for a hit.  If so bet the opposite!
After a few million spins it's down to a cost of 37u for a gain of 36.
Rest is just luck.

We still can fancy to try to find a loophole and enjoy the search.  I love this brainstorming thread, even if it goes remote of Holy Vaddi's clues.
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

-