Random Thoughts

[RouletteGhost]

Falkor is smart

But he has cruel intentions on this forum.

[falkor2k15]

Falkor is smart

But he has cruel intentions on this forum.

I am only trying to help my fellow citizens discover the truth about their enslavement, but all I get is a slap in the face. So how does my help equate to being cruel? Any examples? And what conclusions do you draw from 9/11 being an inside job? Please list them in bullet form. And when will you start to realise that you've been deceived about gambler's fallacy as well?

[MumboJumbo]

Hey falky any clue soon?

[RouletteGhost]

Hey falky any clue soon?

The free masons and jesuits created roulette. Duh

[Scarface]

Falknor, where is an edge implied anywhere in this post?

VDW- no edge here.  VDW is just a fact that an arithmetic progression will occur

Cycle percentages -  all the cycle percentages posted by Pri are in line with what they're supposed to be.  No edge here

Non Random -  no edge here either.  It's like saying in 3 spins either a red or black has to repeat....or one of the dozen have to repeat within 4 spins.  This is just a fact that means nothing

Events -  betting events such as RR or RB bring no advantage over just betting red or black.  Same goes for cycle lengths of dozens, lines, etc

I fail to see anything of value here.  Am I missing something besides what I just mentioned

[falkor2k15]

Falknor, where is an edge implied anywhere in this post?

VDW- no edge here.  VDW is just a fact that an arithmetic progression will occur

Cycle percentages -  all the cycle percentages posted by Pri are in line with what they're supposed to be.  No edge here

Non Random -  no edge here either.  It's like saying in 3 spins either a red or black has to repeat....or one of the dozen have to repeat within 4 spins.  This is just a fact that means nothing

Events -  betting events such as RR or RB bring no advantage over just betting red or black.  Same goes for cycle lengths of dozens, lines, etc

I fail to see anything of value here.  Am I missing something besides what I just mentioned

Yeah, I think we are all missing something really quite dramatic: reddwarf should have come out of the woodwork by now and told us his story - or priyanka should have at least spoken about reddwarf. I still feel kinda sad about that. 

[RouletteGhost]

Falknor, where is an edge implied anywhere in this post?

VDW- no edge here.  VDW is just a fact that an arithmetic progression will occur

Cycle percentages -  all the cycle percentages posted by Pri are in line with what they're supposed to be.  No edge here

Non Random -  no edge here either.  It's like saying in 3 spins either a red or black has to repeat....or one of the dozen have to repeat within 4 spins.  This is just a fact that means nothing

Events -  betting events such as RR or RB bring no advantage over just betting red or black.  Same goes for cycle lengths of dozens, lines, etc

I fail to see anything of value here.  Am I missing something besides what I just mentioned

its mainly stating stuff we know will happen but in no way increases our edge at the game

[falkor2k15]

I'll be posting the practical VdW edge results for the L group later this afternoon, guys - so stay tuned! 

[RouletteGhost]

I'll be posting the practical VdW edge results for the L group later this afternoon, guys - so stay tuned! 

Can't wait.

[DoctorSudoku]

Falknor, where is an edge implied anywhere in this post?

VDW- no edge here.  VDW is just a fact that an arithmetic progression will occur

Cycle percentages -  all the cycle percentages posted by Pri are in line with what they're supposed to be.  No edge here

Non Random -  no edge here either.  It's like saying in 3 spins either a red or black has to repeat....or one of the dozen have to repeat within 4 spins.  This is just a fact that means nothing

Events -  betting events such as RR or RB bring no advantage over just betting red or black.  Same goes for cycle lengths of dozens, lines, etc

I fail to see anything of value here.  Am I missing something besides what I just mentioned

Scarface,
Good summary.

In addition, Priyanka and Gilius-Falkor both ignore the 0 (and the 00) in their discussions, so when you actually play in a B&M casino or an online casino, the 0 (and the 00) will make their appearances in due course -- and you will find yourself as far away from the promised "edge" as ever.

[RouletteGhost]

Scarface,
Good summary.

In addition, Priyanka and Gilius-Falkor both ignore the 0 (and the 00) in their discussions, so when you actually play in a B&M casino or an online casino, the 0 (and the 00) will make their appearances in due course -- and you will find yourself as far away from the promised "edge" as ever.

The idea that betting a certain way effecting the edge in anyway is in and of itself idiocy.

[falkor2k15]

Results posted at the FlatEarthSociety board in the relevant forum... need something to kick-start my site! 

[falkor2k15]

Scarface,
Good summary.

In addition, Priyanka and Gilius-Falkor both ignore the 0 (and the 00) in their discussions, so when you actually play in a B&M casino or an online casino, the 0 (and the 00) will make their appearances in due course -- and you will find yourself as far away from the promised "edge" as ever.

Yeah, you're right, I ignored zeroes in my test. Is this because I am trying to mislead people re: edge instead of variance? 

[RouletteGhost]

Results posted at the FlatEarthSociety board in the relevant forum... need something to kick-start my site! 

Won't be long before you charge a subscription and con people

[sugtips]

Falknor, where is an edge implied anywhere in this post?

VDW- no edge here.  VDW is just a fact that an arithmetic progression will occur

Cycle percentages -  all the cycle percentages posted by Pri are in line with what they're supposed to be.  No edge here

Non Random -  no edge here either.  It's like saying in 3 spins either a red or black has to repeat....or one of the dozen have to repeat within 4 spins.  This is just a fact that means nothing

Events -  betting events such as RR or RB bring no advantage over just betting red or black.  Same goes for cycle lengths of dozens, lines, etc

I fail to see anything of value here.  Am I missing something besides what I just mentioned

Scarface, after spending days (with lot of efforts) to read all 97 pages of this thread and read lot of posts multiple times, I found your this very post on page 97. Now I am confused, am I loving you or am I hating you, I think both at the same time. I cannot express my feelings at the moment.

Hopefully I will get more this type of Superb reviews in future from you. Thanks a lot, God Bless You.

Best Regards,
SugTips