My new system - feedback appreciated

[RouletteGhost]

.

[falkor2k15]

After analyzing the above data there are 3 choices moving forward as I see it:
1) Correctly weight the bets from the beginning, increasing chips from inside to outside (possibly followed by option 2 or 3)
OR
2) Upon each complete loss increase the Splits first then the Straight Ups
OR
3) Upon each complete loss increase both the Splits and the Straight Ups

I will test 2 and 3 next.

[falkor2k15]

Testing 3) first - game 1:
link:s://youtu.be/FmtfuNg92MA

game 2:
link:s://youtu.be/W8J815UEZLM

game 3:
link:s://youtu.be/fsgQwWM6JrA

game 4: (PERFECT!)
link:s://youtu.be/2JLAKImszY8

[falkor2k15]

WHAT A BLINDER!!!!!  Best game yet:
link:s://youtu.be/w2mBv_B42Bo (game 5)

Smashed it big time on that one!  That is so neat... 

[RouletteGhost]

Please lay out the rules for the strategy

[falkor2k15]

Please lay out the rules for the strategy

KEEP THE FAITH - RULES / INSTRUCTIONS

1) Wait for one virtual spin then cover the remaining numbers on the board in the cheapest possible way:
Let's say 36 hits: 1 split (34+35), 1 street (31-33), 2 double streets (19-30), low EC (1-18), zero (0)
Let's say 17 hits: 2 straight ups (16 and 18), 1 street (13-15), 1 dozen (1-12), high EC (19-36), zero (0)

Those are the 2 main starting bet selections depending on where the ball landed on the carpet layout. (column 1/3 vs. column 2)

2) 36/37 numbers are covered to begin with, so we should expect wins to mostly occur during the first few spins, as we are repeating the complete bet selection, albeit with minor bet sub-conversions when certain areas of the board hit a long the way (evolving from the initial layout established in step 1). When a number hits, the chip covering that area of the board needs to be removed and the bet re-organised for that same area - minus the number that just hit - hence we sub-divide and break down the bet into smaller units. We are always trying to cover the unhit numbers in the cheapest possible way surrounding the void that's being created by the exclusion of numbers that have appeared once or more, as the trot progresses.

Straight Up: we just take off the chip and usually end set on a new high otherwise continue playing if more than 18 numbers are in play, but no need to alter anything else in terms of bet selection.
Split: Remove the chip(s) from the winning split and place onto the other Single number of the Split that has yet to hit.
Quad (we don't start out with Quads but they can result from ongoing management of the bet selection; see next section): Remove the chip(s) and choose 1 unit for the remaining unhit part of the Quad consisting of 1 Split and 1 Straight Up. Try to use a combo that puts the Straight up next to another Straight up for potential merging with a neighbour (see bet selection management below).
Street: Remove chip(s) and place on the unhit Split part of the Street.
Double Street: Remove chip(s) and place 1 chip on the Street and 1 chip on the Split (5 numbers in total - minus the number that just hit).
Dozen: Remove chip(s) and place 1 chip on the 1 unhit Double Street, 1 Street and 1 Split (or 2 singles depending on the column of the winning number and physical constraints to placing the bet selection around it; see why we are forced to used different variations in step 1)
EC: Convert the bet through a combination of the above bet types (by the physical nature of the carpet this will include a dozen if the ball landed in the middle dozen; otherwise Double Streets and smaller bet types)

3) When you lose outright, i.e. a number that has previously hit, repeats, place same bet selection again - as always - but increase 1 unit on any Splits and Straight Ups (this rule is currently in testing and subject to change). Since no number has struck we do not need to modify/convert any bet selections for any areas of the board ala step 2.


BET SELECTION MANAGEMENT (merging bets into larger units)

Whilst playing the 3 steps above we are always looking to reduce the cost of the bet selection in-between bets, so if there are any splits next to each other then we convert them to a Quad. If 2 Straight Ups should become neighbours then we convert them to a Split. Sometimes 2 Streets can end up beside each other - convertible into a Double Street. Once at the very beginning 2 Double Streets got converted into a Dozen. This maintains complete cover of the board in the cheapest possible way - notwithstanding when we start to lose and are increasing chips frantically on the Splits and Straight Ups (so this housekeeping of merging bets is not set in stone by any means).

Most importantly: watch and learn from the videos above!

[falkor2k15]

After analyzing the above data there are 3 choices moving forward as I see it:
1) Correctly weight the bets from the beginning, increasing chips from inside to outside (possibly followed by option 2 or 3)
OR
2) Upon each complete loss increase the Splits first then the Straight Ups
OR
3) Upon each complete loss increase both the Splits and the Straight Ups

I will test 2 and 3 next.

Variation 3 hasn't lost yet - but I'm going to test variation 1 as I feel it will give a stronger starting game and possibly will hold out just as well?

[falkor2k15]

Weighted bets is looking more better and more stable. I had a few early losses, but recovered very well and kept above zero most of the time :

Ended with 17 numbers in play

So every spin we should bet 1 unit on Straight Ups, 2 units on Splits, 3 on Streets, 4 on Double Streets, 5 on Dozens, 6 on ECs. When converting a bet into smaller units after a win the amount of chips should match whatever another bet type is as the same level. When a complete loss occurs we should increase 1 chip on everything - magnifying the bets, but keeping the same weight ratio. I'll make a video tomorrow. 

[RouletteGhost]

I admit i have made shitty systems before

But if you follow this guy plan on losing your shirt

Take his advice you will be on the corner begging for shillings and pence

Amazing how a few days ago he had a millionaire system now he is preaching this COMPLETE INSANITY

Im sorry but if you buy any of this then you are gullible!

I feel bad sometimes because you really cant see through people online sometimes. So i dont know if he is smart and hates us all or if he is really this dumb.

Ive never seen such impractical, reckless betting in my life.

See picture. Follow this guy and that will be you

At least the premise of grassroots makes sense

As far as im concerned this whole thing is MALARKY just like everything else he posts

EVERYTHING he has EVER posted is garbage

This guy really is somethin else.

Red flag:
-cover the whole board except last number hit, on online RNG in demo mode. Yea, that'll work. All i needed to see was bet every number except the last one hit on rng. Amateur stuff. Or you work for the online casino.

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

[Orochi]

I admit i have made shitty systems before

But if you follow this guy plan on losing your shirt

Take his advice you will be on the corner begging for shillings and pence

Amazing how a few days ago he had a millionaire system now he is preaching this COMPLETE INSANITY

Im sorry but if you buy any of this then you are gullible!

I feel bad sometimes because you really cant see through people online sometimes. So i dont know if he is smart and hates us all or if he is really this dumb.

Ive never seen such impractical, reckless betting in my life.

See picture. Follow this guy and that will be you

At least the premise of grassroots makes sense

As far as im concerned this whole thing is MALARKY just like everything else he posts

EVERYTHING he has EVER posted is garbage

This guy really is somethin else.

Red flag:
-cover the whole board except last number hit, on online RNG in demo mode. Yea, that'll work. All i needed to see was bet every number except the last one hit on rng. Amateur stuff. Or you work for the online casino.

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

RG is wrong to share an idea !?!

Grassroot it wasnt you ideia too... Soo stop complain! I proof to all "u is not blind" that Grassroot will fail in the long run, still u can play it or not at your own risk !!! I think you have a very limited vision of this game.

Ever u see me saying this system "xpto" fail without proving it !?!

So dont attack people and stop saying "INSANE" cause i never see you show any good fundamented ideias. Worse u just said " that you made shitty systems". I could bet that you dont go to pass that barrier.

[RouletteGhost]

RG is wrong to share an idea !?!

Grassroot it wasnt you ideia too... Soo stop complain! I proof to all "u is not blind" that Grassroot will fail in the long run, still u can play it or not at your own risk !!! I think you have a very limited vision of this game.

Ever u see me saying this system "xpto" fail without proving it !?!

So dont attack people and stop saying "INSANE" cause i never see you show any good fundamented ideias. Worse u just said " that you made shitty systems". I could bet that you dont go to pass that barrier.

This strategy is insane. 

Do you know who falkor is?

Claimed several times he had a grail to share and never did. Lies

Hows the millionaire system? He had you on his list....did he deliver?

He is betting every number but the last one hit. Thats an idea?! I can tell you that fails without proving it lol

Orochi you know better then to believe this trash, i will quote him on this strategy

"2) 36/37 numbers are covered to begin with"

If you think this is an idea then im in the twilight zone

Besides. Its not even practical on a real table

[falkor2k15]

We cover the board except the last number - but it's on a rolling basis - so each time we bet we are covering 1 less number than before until we get down to 18 numbers left (by then we are covering only half the board). This system is based on the fact that the rarest event on the board is when a single number (or same area of the board) repeats multiple times; therefore the board has to open up - so we capitalise on that and at the same time we take advantage of the carpet layout that they have given us!

[keepontryin]

rg why knock the guy test it yourself.......falkor may have something here....

[RouletteGhost]

rg why knock the guy test it yourself.......falkor may have something here....

Why? See picture.

And last year he was banned for leading people on. He was banned for claims with no explanation. Then came back under this name

He does this one to two times a year.

[falkor2k15]

The weighted bets are proving quite "weighty" when on a later losing streak:
990 EC (35 numbers) 19
991 DS (34 numbers) 3
981 DZ (33 numbers) 28
980 DS (32 numbers) 9
984 QD (31 numbers) 8
983 DS (30 numbers) 13
957 loss 8
974 SP (29 numbers) 7
939 loss 3
929 DS (28 numbers) 24
879 loss 28
907 SP (27 numbers) 22
891 DS (26 numbers) 36
mistake
926 SP (25 numbers) 29
875 loss 29
898 ST (24 numbers) 16
951 SP (23 numbers) 2
897 loss 29
930 ST (22 numbers) 5
868 loss 8
952 QD (21 numbers) 14
loss 3
loss 29
loss 5
-90+ each

EC x 1
DZ x 1
DS x 5
SP x 4
QD x 2
ST x 2
SU x 0

I'm now more inclined to play like this - without any progression - but divide the largest area bets into smaller units on a loss and merge back again on a win:
link:s://youtu.be/MU_rR_a1Ht4 (version 3; games 1&2)