Even Stevens

[RouletteGhost]

It's not the point. The point is, when you do the wallpaper test, you would HOPE
to do well for a while before having a loss. Or a really bad run.

When it slaps you in the face, it's not good.

Im watching naked gun right now. 1988 it was released. They made fun of democrats. The good ole days. Im drunk

I hate democrats liberals and democrats

[The General]

I don't like democrats because they want to kill puppies and bunnies.

[RouletteGhost]

I don't like democrats because they want to kill puppies and bunnies.

democrats

liberals

socialists

all the same

ba hum bug

[mogul397]

Back to reality, been testing this method a bit and it is holding up pretty well.
Very well, actually.

I'm still a bit confused about the idea of waiting for virtual wins/losses,
vs playing through for continuing chops.  What the rules are, and
what the best way to play them are.

[Tomla021]

I hate to be the guy to say this. You say your doing well with it but you dont know the rules?

[mogul397]

I hate to be the guy to say this. You say your doing well with it but you dont know the rules?

Then don't be............

As with most things the rules change arbitrarily. Been a while since I played with this.

April 9?  Double winner. My 33 wedding anniversary and 6 month anniversary that I have
this cast on my leg!!!!!!  (A dubious distinction).

[mogul397]

I hate to be the guy to say this. You say your doing well with it but you dont know the rules?

On the serious side, I ran some zumma pages and it was like winning the lottery.
Unfortunately it doesn't always work out that way. Played with this before.  Can't help
"doing well" when the pages just spit out singles.  And multiple singles.

Have to see how correct "rules" will put on the brakes. Also, D'alenbert can be and is VERY
dangerous, when the tide is not in your favor.

[RouletteGhost]

Zumma. Page 27. 15 spins down. Double loss. Scrap it

[RouletteGhost]

that was a joke by the way

for a mechanical system this does very well

i am testing BACC shoes with it now as well

[mogul397]

that was a joke by the way

for a mechanical system this does very well

i am testing BACC shoes with it now as well

I'm not sure what I was thinking when I explored this direction.  Memory tells me that
somehow I was trying to play both sides of the fence and work on singles and then
multiples. That's what I recall. Then, of course, just one side or the other.

So there WOULD be times when singles were scarce. Hence the value of the
virtual wins or losses.  But it is painful to be in a choppy area and let them all
go by.

[Willie]

Back to reality, been testing this method a bit and it is holding up pretty well.
Very well, actually.

I'm still a bit confused about the idea of waiting for virtual wins/losses,
vs playing through for continuing chops.  What the rules are, and
what the best way to play them are.

Here is how I play it-
Wait for OE or EO to happen in the start>

O
O
E- trigger, will bet odd on next spin
O- win/will wait for a virtual loss before betting (virtual loss being OO or EE) so no bet on next spin
E- no bet on next spin
E- Virtual loss/bet odd on next spin
E- loss/will wait for virtual win before betting (virtual win being EO in this case) so no bet on next spin
O- Virtual win/bet even on next spin
E- win

Hope its clear now

[RouletteGhost]

Willie whats the longest L streak to date?

Thanks

[Willie]

Willie whats the longest L streak to date?

Thanks

I have seen a loss streak of 4 till date, but I finish the session at $50 profit, playing with $10 as base.
And it has recovered well from drawdowns to take me to my session win goals.

[RouletteGhost]

I have seen a loss streak of 4 till date, but I finish the session at $50 profit, playing with $10 as base.
And it has recovered well from drawdowns to take me to my session win goals.

Thank you

That loss streak is not bad and if it keeps up i may entertain an aggressive progression

[mogul397]

Here is how I play it-
Wait for OE or EO to happen in the start>

O
O
E- trigger, will bet odd on next spin
O- win/will wait for a virtual loss before betting (virtual loss being OO or EE) so no bet on next spin
E- no bet on next spin
E- Virtual loss/bet odd on next spin
E- loss/will wait for virtual win before betting (virtual win being EO in this case) so no bet on next spin
O- Virtual win/bet even on next spin
E- win

Hope its clear now

It is. Thanks Willie.

So if I understand the logic, if you get a sequence of "doublets", or longer runs on
both sides, it would kill you.

OOEEOOEEOOEEOOEE  OR longer strings of "virtual losses".
Cause each time there was a change it would be the "virtual win"
that enabled betting for the next loss.

My thinking about the "virtual win" was an ACTUAL win.  Like seeing "OEO"
or "EOE".  The win being the trigger and then the win. Not just the trigger.

Playing and looking for "doubles" (Or avoiding them) is a common stragegy. And it
is surprising how often you get strings of them.