UDP - Unique Dozen Progression

[mogul397]

Agree.  Sorry.  Kind of like looking at the negative of a picture.
But I think both have value.

Looking back at my previous set of data where I ended up with 4-5 losses,
we might assume a continuum of the game with what I show today.  For this
method looking for the 3rd unique after two I have.

For dozens: L L L L W W L W W W L L L W W L W L
For columbs  W L L W W L L .

There seems a certainty that you will often have multiple losses in a row.
The question is, how will this endure the MM as you state it?

For dozens, starting fresh, we have

1  L  -1
1  L  -2
2  L  -4
2  L  -6
3  W  0 (Do I reset to the 2nd "1" bet? Or give it another 3 bet?)
1  W  +2
1  L   +1
1  W  +3
1  W  +5
1  W  +7
1  L    +6
1  L    +5
2  L    +3
2  W   +7
1  W    +9
1   L     +8
1   W    +10
1   L     +9........

Not bad!!!!!!!!  See? I gave it it's due!!!!
Looks pretty good on paper now!!!!  I'll notch it up couple
levels in my confidence......

[RouletteGhost]

mogul what were you doing

betting for the 3rd to be unique only when previous 2 were unique?

[mogul397]

mogul what were you doing

betting for the 3rd to be unique only when previous 2 were unique?

The results came from my earlier post.

The numbers on the left are the bet amounts associated with each bet,
according to the progression. Not which dozen it was.

Wins and losses generated from reply #55

[Archer]

Hi Willie,

Thank you for sharing this method, I like this one.

Archer.

[nottophammer]

Nottophammer, I agree with you that a dozen can sleep for long.. but here we are
a) not betting continuously
b) not betting on the same dozen
Try it once

Willie about the parley. I used Parley in dont knock it till you try it for double dozen, the parley did ok. So parley could work here, just depends on how you wanna play.
Reply 29 in dont knock it, various ways to get a win.

If i'm honest i seldom looked in this topic, but dont take that the wrong way, as i've looked at ideas and methods posted over the last few years and always end up back looking at improving non-hits and just watching the trot. But one needs to look at others ideas as you might just see something that gets your bet selection to the next level.

[mogul397]

My weekends have been busy.  Back again.

Now that I'm thinking more in the direction of the single dozen,
the parlay on a 2-1 looks like a way to get rich. Certainly dip a toe in
and try it one time after a win. Or may be an increment where you are
keeping profit.

Win 1.  Win 2 units.
Bet 2 units, win 4.  Up 6.  Then??
Bet 6 units, win. Up 18.  Fair enough.

For the results in reply 50, there are 3 groups of 3 groups of 2 wins and
one with 3.  Either one (The 3 double wins or single triple) give you
18 units profit. If you can count on that you're in gravey!!!

Isn't it way more fun playing with different amounts you could win, then
how little you lose?

Or keep some of the 6 unit win and bet 3 units.  Or 2 or 4.

If you're not in trouble that could be a fun and profitable play.

If you look at reply 50, there are 3 groups of double wins and one with 3.
Either one gives you 18 units profit!!!!!!!  Gravy train.

Isn't it way more fun talking about different ways to win more than how
to lose less?

[DoctorSudoku]

and always end up back looking at improving non-hits and just watching the trot.

Nottop,
Insightful point you have made in the above quote.

But what are your criteria for distinguishing between a non-hit number (but one which potentially might hit soon) and a genuine sleeper?

[nottophammer]

As play starts with 37 non-hits, are they not the favourable bet? What distinguish non-hits are 1x’s and >1x’s.
I see in spins 11-20 we usually get 7 non-hits, so with watching how they are hitting one can make a decision

[nottophammer]

Doctor
3 games earlier in ladbrokes.
If i just stuck to betting 0x's in 1st game +42, but got ambitious and headed into a hole. But resetting at spin 40 to start game 2, the hole was getting smaller, reset at spin 40 again and game 3 starts, see the games are following each other so as game1 and 2 are plus at spin 40, is it paying out as 0x's are coming fast.

15 units down at spin 13 of game 3, but got a phone call so had to leave, but it looks good that it could have been 8,+3 or the usual 7,+2

As quoted in 9# method, look at game 1 spin 7 is #26,sector 4, 21 spins later sector 4 hits, so forget that idea

[mogul397]

Doctor
3 games earlier in ladbrokes.
If i just stuck to betting 0x's in 1st game +42, but got ambitious and headed into a hole. But resetting at spin 40 to start game 2, the hole was getting smaller, reset at spin 40 again and game 3 starts, see the games are following each other so as game1 and 2 are plus at spin 40, is it paying out as 0x's are coming fast.

15 units down at spin 13 of game 3, but got a phone call so had to leave, but it looks good that it could have been 8,+3 or the usual 7,+2

As quoted in 9# method, look at game 1 spin 7 is #26,sector 4, 21 spins later sector 4 hits, so forget that idea

I don't know what I'm looking at.