• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Designing a new system.... Mist Trap 2

Started by falkor2k15, Jan 18, 06:38 AM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

falkor2k15

I've learnt some interesting concepts over the past few years mainly thanks to Priyanka and his students and my friend in NY. But also a few systems I designed in the past have contributed to that knowledge, including Mist Trap. I like to try to put all this together for a new system.

We can play any bet selection and we will generally break even and lose to the house edge, but in terms of predictability we can say, thanks to the Pigeonhole principle, that "things" (all different types of events over many spins) will repeat more as opposed to all sleepers showing first. But I believe there comes a point where we do expect the sleeper to appear instead of the repeat? But Pri did show that stats/ratios only hold true and consistent for repeat events.

Mist Trap taught me that we can parachute off small wins with low payout odds whilst waiting for Straight Up numbers (or those positions with higher payout odds) to repeat. I believe we can use these delayed repeats to our advantage - together with the table limits of 2,000 - and the constraints of the carpet.

Mist Trap was good because it was designed based around the number repeat being the main event - but the smaller events that provided "life-lines" whilst aiming for the main event were not necessarily based on repeats. So I think going forward every bet selection we play for needs to be based around a repeat of some kind. With each small win comes an opportunity for a positive progression with the potential for breaking the bank the longer the main number repeat is delayed. Ideally, we can end up in a situation with 25 unique numbers and 0 repeats. Now, if those numbers just happened to fit the first 2 dozens exactly, i.e. numbers 0-24 = 1 appearance and numbers 25-36 having not yet shown then I think we would be in far more advantageous position than if the numbers were more evenly distributed. So I think the ultimate strategy needs to have some degree of carpet manipulation, so that we try to mold our bets towards the ideal distribution for that final series of killer bets that is going to break the bank with ease and practicality.

I'm not sure where to begin, but I know that dozens has a minimum bet of 5 in most casinos, so I think starting with Line Cycles is the cheapest way to begin the attack and begin the parachute that will attempt to lead us - one MLE repeat at a time - towards the 35:1 repeat. It may be possible to create a custom event that is 70:1, but then with that I'm sure we would lose any advantage that I believe the carpet layout provides in collaboration with the table limits.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

-