Fire Burn

[ignatus]

This is an experiment, (more testing is needed!)....

Trigger/Procedure: A new DS hit; When a new DS hit, bet the 3 numbers of the opposite color. Also put 3u on the oppsite H/L. Now, for each new DS within the particular H/L bet, repeat procedure; bet the 3 numbers of the opposite color. Also put 3u on the oppsite H/L... (Stop & Restart procedure at any hit) When all 3 DS are bet, double bets, and double for each loss until hit.

Bank/stoploss: A minimum of 200u (playing with 1u bets),

First tests was played with 5u bets (wingoal +1000u, stoploss 1000u)

3/3 Games won

[ignatus]

5/5 Games won I don't care how the charts look, as long as stoploss is not reached, and wingoal is reached.

[ignatus]

9/10 Games won   

[celescliff]

Keep in mind that you should also look at this:



If you look at your graphs in this system of yours, you notice that you had massive dd, so what if you would have started play when the dd started?

So keep that in mind, because that and lowest will show what br is needed, based on those small tests, that is.

[ignatus]

If you look at your graphs in this system of yours, you notice that you had massive dd

Yes? I know, but the point is to win more than lose, and quit when you've reached the wingoal. i won 9/10 from the first tests, so it *seems* to work pretty well from the first tests..playing with a wingoal/stoploss of +200/-200u (1u bets)

[celescliff]

You didn't understand what I meant. Here's another one:



Here you see that the lowest I got was -180, but if you look at Unit Drawdown, you see that I had maximum 320. If I said that you need a 200u bankroll, and would have start playing where that dd started, you would have lost, since I had a dd of 320u.

I mean if you going to decide what br is needed, you must also look at the maximum drawdown aswell.