• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

phoenix system

Started by albertojonas, Oct 17, 03:01 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

dennisbelle

My pleasure.  Thanks for posting the method! ::)

GLC

Quote from: dennisbelle on Oct 23, 09:51 PM 2010
My pleasure.  Thanks for posting the method! ::)

Dennis,

I hate to be so fickle, well, no I don't.

Look at my new system under full systems titled "This is the ONE!

It's easier to play and has great potential.

G
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

albertojonas

I continue to play the progression

1
2
4/4

6
12
24/24

only i play virtual and wait a loss to happen on 3 consecutive spins.

did not lost yet.


i play it in conjuntion to another method wich is:

when 2 consecutive numbers hit double street 3 or 4 (13-18 /19-24)
i bet 10 units on the contrary low/high and 5 units on 3rd/1st dozzen
example

20
24
bet 10 units low and 5 units 3rd dozzen + 1 chip at zero

Cheers


PS- Dennisbelle, to sorry for your current losses, but may i ask exactly how are you playing the system?
best regards

dennisbelle

"Dennisbelle, to sorry for your current losses, but may I ask exactly how are you playing the system?"

I tested the same way you are playing but I played every spin.

albertojonas

anyone tested it the original way?
i found it was created based on kimo li cocepts...

GLC

Quote from: albertojonas on Oct 26, 07:11 PM 2010
Anyone tested it the original way?
i found it was created based on kimo li cocepts...

alberto,

I do not understand the recovery part of the original way.

The 1st half of the system is pretty straight forward, but if you lose the 16 units he doesn't clarify how to bet the even chances and dozens.

How do you understand it?

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

albertojonas

Quote from: GLC on Oct 26, 08:29 PM 2010
alberto,

I do not understand the recovery part of the original way.

The 1st half of the system is pretty straight forward, but if you lose the 16 units he doesn't clarify how to bet the even chances and dozens.

How do you understand it?

George


i play it this way

1 chip on Red
always if win reset
if loss 2 chips on even
if loss 3 chips on dozzen
if loss (6-)
4 chips on red - here if win same bet again
etc...

I will post an example



GLC

Quote from: albertojonas on Oct 26, 10:11 PM 2010

i play it this way

1 chip on Red
always if win reset
if loss 2 chips on even
if loss 3 chips on dozzen
if loss (6-)
4 chips on red - here if win same bet again
etc...

I will post an example


Alberto,

Thanks for your explanation and example of the 2nd part.

I can't help thinking that if the 2nd part is so good that it's used to recover a loss from the 1st part, why not use the 2nd part all the time.

Your spreadsheet looks like a pretty effective system.

It might be the better of the 2 methods.

What do you think?

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

albertojonas

it is slower in profit. and maybe the conditions are bond to happen for the second, if first one fails...
have to test it more extensively

cheers

GLC

Quote from: albertojonas on Oct 27, 03:33 AM 2010
It is slower in profit. and maybe the conditions are bond to happen for the second, if first one fails...
have to test it more extensively

cheers

Excellent point Al.  I wonder if this recovery method might work with some of our tweaked progressions.

If I understand what you mean, you're saying if the spins are such that they cause you to lose playing the 1st way, then those spins may be just bad enough that they are good for the 2nd system to win.

Let's see.

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

albertojonas

workkin for me.

:embarrassed:

as i said at wrong place:

781+++


-