Turbo Denzie or is it Denzie Turbo

[denzie]

Wow great response Mr j.  Well at least you've learned how to post images. Very impressive. 

Btw I knew you ain't got the balls to go head to head with me or anyone. Thx for proving that you are just...a keyboard warrior  (your words again)

Anyway im out. Best to all and keep winning

[Steve]

Not many people left at GF. Ken, Turbo, and bots. Only a matter of time with a dickhead admin.

B team? Like the systems he published are any better.

[Taotie]

Poor Ken.

Let's forgive him all his trespasses and deliver us from evil.

[Bayes]

Now you need to work out how many units to "hedge" on the High, Dozens, Lines, Streets, and Zero.

Hedging doesn't work if bets have a negative expectation.



But at least your description of the method was fairly clear, so at least members can test it.

[Taotie]

Now you need to work out how many units to "hedge" on the High, Dozens, Lines, Streets, and Zero.

That's easy.

Put the same chip on all your hedges as you do on your straights.


..........now that's gold!

[falkor2k15]

Gilius-Falkor,
For the US double zero wheel, any method worth its salt needs to include the columns.

If you ignore the columns, you will do so at your own peril !

But there's hardly any common numbers between columns and all the main groups running perpendicular, hence less dependency.

[falkor2k15]

Falkor, the first thing i saw in your image was PIGEONS. Little flappy birds.

What is going on up there?

Seriously Falkor your explanations are so warped nobody can make sense of them. The image looks more like an advertisement.

And the parts that are clear are actually INCORRECT. And when someone points it out to you, you still argue the point. What are we supposed to do? Keep arguing the point when you either dont understand or dont care?

All concepts and facts surrounding repeats are based on this discipline of maths:
link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle

[falkor2k15]

I forgot about the roof!

Saxon house was it?

The roof is the first unique number; all the other groups represent the foundation that the Straight Ups depend on (and vice versa). If you bet street 1 then you are also betting on-behalf of number 1.

[falkor2k15]

straight is all the way zoomed in, EC is all the way zoomed out

if you know dozen 1 should win, you can play LOW and cover more numbers and win.  just an idea! 

You are correct about betting on-behalf, but the "zooming in/out" refers to something else...
Zoom in = add more single spin pigeon streams for more potential simultaneous wins = capture more wins.
Zoom out = use only a single stream, but ensure it comprises variable-spin pigeons = capture more spins.

[falkor2k15]

Hedging doesn't work if bets have a negative expectation.

It's not as simple as that since there's a few "dynamic" processes going on here, and they're not happening over a static number of spins nor using static bets:
*Closing off several group repeats via the OPPOSITE starting unique followed by the SAME starting unique is one large variable-spin event, made up of mini-events, and working as one dependent system.
*The hedging will produce different sub-total profits depending on how quick the repeats close - each sub-profit is then parlayed and redistributed for the next hedge as part of the larger event.
*Now, this is the hardest part to describe: each dependent group provides a different dimension in terms of payout odds (main problem we face with Roulette), and we are providing "overwhelming" influence towards the smaller and larger repeat events that depend on the previous uniques. Picture how Straight Ups are equally-likely - yet the repeat will always happen before 37 uniques have each had a single appearance - or picture the Birthday Paradox and the repeats happening in the last 18. Here, if we don't get a repeat on a dozen then it's compensated by another group. Apologies for the crude explanation, but that's the best I can do.

It's also recommended to slowly bring in the splits and straight ups in this strategy with the intention of closing them off alongside the other aforementioned groups for extra compensation.

[RouletteGhost]

Poor Ken.

Let's forgive him all his trespasses and deliver us from evil.

Amen

[maestro]

@falkor ...falkor pigeon hole will not work due to payout...sometimes you will get event you looking for but will not get the profit simply because you dont know exactly when event will happen so you are forced to cover every spin..in some short hits you will get profit in some long ones  you will lose....at the end you know where it heads -2.7%

[cht]

The better response than a negative response is no response. Think about that et al.

[Steve]

Imagine betting on a coin toss. A win is +1 and loss is -1. Mostly you break even.

But every few tosses, even if you win, you lose your bet. Thats like the HE. You dont know exactly when youll have that guaranteed disadvantage. You can try overcoming it with progression, but you just risk more money.

There are no patterns. No way to know the toss outcome. No way to know anything. Your guesses are as good as random.

Pigeon holes, roofing, forcing outcomes, streaks, hot sides, cold sides, all bullshit. The only way to profit long term is know in advance which side will win, with significantly better than random accuracy. Reading random, follow the trot, more bullshit.

When you look for patterns in random, you are actually looking at cause and effect. Thats exactly what all AP is. Cause and effect.

You can do this either by correlating variables to spin outcomes, OR by looking for a mathematical relationship in spin results alone (fractals).

There are other potential ways of changing odds, but most people look at patterns like trots, rrbbrb crap etc. The next step if you want that is use software to find anomalies for you, or waste decades of your life with manual trial and error. I already freely published software to help.

[falkor2k15]

@falkor ...falkor pigeon hole will not work due to payout...sometimes you will get event you looking for but will not get the profit simply because you dont know exactly when event will happen so you are forced to cover every spin..in some short hits you will get profit in some long ones  you will lose....at the end you know where it heads -2.7%

In theory that's what we would expect - the reason I've outlined a series of evidences, concepts and undeniable facts in this topic that we should aim to apply in order to overcome this problem. If the Random trot map looked the same as the Roulette trop map, or repeats were not dependent on uniques, or we had no control over variance, then your out of date conclusion would not have come into question. There's also several other concepts we've discussed here that you haven't taken into account. In the end your reply amounts to memorizing what you learnt about -2.7% years ago and repeating it ad hoc - in the face of new contradictory evidence that warrants investigation of it's own merit.