Turbo Denzie or is it Denzie Turbo

[falkor2k15]

Now take a look at this... any resemblance to what Pri did with HL?
link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=kbKtFN71Lfs

[cht]

Cht,
You can be as sarcastic  as you like. That is your prerogative.

Take a look at the above quote -- that is Priyanka's first post to start that Funny Sequences thread.

Focus on the parts that I highlighted -- evidently, Priyanka thought that she had made a notable discovery.

That's why I said that it's GOOD you took the trouble to point that out for others to realise the obvious.

Sarcastic, oh well it's my simple way of driving home the point(hightlighting) your post make to the readers. Hope they get it anyway.

And yes I agree the way Priyanka put it across sounds though he made a notable discovery.

Btw did I get it right ? He ?

[Bayes]

To achieve this dependency, what she did was this:
For each TWO consecutive pairs of an H/L combination, she used the SECOND element of the FIRST pair as the FIRST element of the SECOND pair.

Doing the above -- inevitably -- resulted in HL and LH having a difference of either 0 or 1.

Thanks for clearing that up. But a created dependency isn't a "natural" dependency, so I don't really see much value in it.

[cht]

2) Fact 2: Repeats depend on the uniques that appeared before. R... 75% chance red will repeat - disprove this FACT!
R... BB = 25%
R... R or BR = 75%

This is incorrect.

BB, BR, RR, RB - there're 4 combinations, you missed one out - the last one.

[RouletteGhost]

In 3 spins minus the zero, there MUST be a repeat.

Wow. Want a trophy?

[falkor2k15]

Thanks for clearing that up. But a created dependency isn't a "natural" dependency, so I don't really see much value in it.

Don't give up yet... keep brainstorming! It's one of the 3 keys to edge... watch the fractals video... what is happening here? what is a "created dependency" exactly? You're almost there...

[Bayes]

2) Fact 2: Repeats depend on the uniques that appeared before. R... 75% chance red will repeat - disprove this FACT!

Outcomes are symmetrical, so you could say if the first spin is B, then there is a 75% chance B will repeat in the next 2 spins. Exactly the same for R. So this so-called dependency seems to suggest that you would have an advantage betting the same-as-last outcome, yes?

Why, then, don't you see any advantage when you actually do it? (falkor)

[cht]

Don't give up yet... keep brainstorming! It's one of the 3 keys to edge... watch the fractals video... what is happening here? what is a "created dependency" exactly? You're almost there...

Why don't you share your roulette trot heatmap so that others can join in the test of this 'dependency' that you're going on about ? That visual tool can help progress your intended brainstorming right ?

[falkor2k15]

Outcomes are symmetrical, so you could say if the first spin is B, then there is a 75% chance B will repeat in the next 2 spins. Exactly the same for R. So this so-called dependency seems to suggest that you would have an advantage betting the same-as-last outcome, yes?

Why, then, don't you see any advantage when you actually do it? (falkor)

Yep - there is advantage - but only if you can penetrate the unfair payout odds problem of Roulette. You either need to use it in combination with dependency 1 (capture more wins) or dependency 3 - or you can create self-defined pigeons instead to be able to use it alone = capture more spins.

[DoctorSudoku]

You either need to use it in combination with dependency 1 (capture more wins) or dependency 3 - or you can create self-defined pigeons instead to be able to use it alone = capture more spins.

Gilius-Falkor,
Okay, so there are different types of dependencies -- 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.

Can you explain clearly what these different types of dependencies are? Use concrete examples involving actual spins, if you can.

That way we can all be on the same page -- and then we can all go and hunt down some of these pigeons that you keep harping about all the time.

[falkor2k15]

Gilius-Falkor,
Okay, so there are different types of dependencies -- 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.

Can you explain clearly what these different types of dependencies are? Use concrete examples involving actual spins, if you can.

That way we can all be on the same page -- and then we can all go and hunt down some of these pigeons that you keep harping about all the time.

I've already explained what they are and given clear examples, so you need to go back and read properly, otherwise we are just going around in circles.

[denzie]

Falkor. ..I really love your signature. Pretty cool. But you miss the mark with All your rambling in this thread. As to Steve and Bayes....You guys know a lot about this game but yet you can't see  how easy it actually could be. There are things happen in EACH AND EVERY session. If you know that then how hard it can be to win them ? Not that hard. I'm serious. It ain't rocket science.

Anyway I only came back here to reply to misses J. He act like he's a big dog at the other forum when all his methods posted are coded and lost much more than my stuff. (Yes more than the HE) And my old stuff loses too after 100k spins. It is what it is. I've learned and moved on.

Btw misses J.....i challenge you to kick my ass in roulette. You wanna do it on Celtic?  Fine by me. Say when and let's do this. Actions speaks louder than words. They asked you to play here and Celtic but not once you accepted. Why? Pussy

So let's make it official : Mr J...I challenge you in a roulette face off... Steve And Bayes and others are welcome too. Enough with the Internet warriors. Put your money where your mouth is. Sounds fair right ?

I'm done with the forums as I'm making my money on a daily basis. And some here know that as they see me play at unibet and talk to me on the chat.

But before I go......common You f*c king pussy....accept My challenge and show me how stupid I am at this game and how good you are. (Strange though after all these years you don't leave your city to play or sell your house to bet bigger ---> your words hot shot)

SO ENOUGH TALK....LET'S GET IT ON MR J

[DoctorSudoku]

Denzie,
Since you are having success with betting on repeaters, can I ask you a couple of questions:

1. Let's say you start betting for repeaters in, say, cycle no. 1. Does your betting "spill over" into the next cycle of 37 spins? Or do you end your betting for one cycle at the end of that specific cycle (regardless of whether you are in loss/profit)?

2. On average, how many numbers are you betting on? And, again, on average how high into the progression do you usually go (that is, what is the maximum number of units you bet on each individual number?)?

If I am asking too much information that you don't want to reveal publicly, then I totally understand that. You don't have to reveal anything that you do not feel comfortable sharing.

[Steve]

Falkor, I understand enough of what you're saying now to understand you really don't know what you're talking about. What I don't understand is how and why you don't understand. I think you should carefully think about the logic. You arent the only person to misunderstand something - we all do at some point. But some of what you said is particular bad understanding.

[Steve]

So let's make it official : Mr J...I challenge you in a roulette face off... Steve And Bayes and others are welcome too. Enough with the Internet warriors. Put your money where your mouth is. Sounds fair right ?

I dont think comparing to roulette computers is fair to other methods. There are other methods that work, without relying on progression. Imagine if they did apply a progression. Often we do but it isnt needed.

Denzie, what you have is random bets with progression. I know you've been winning so far. Most progressions are profitable for a while. You'll eventually see what I mean but for now you can believe I'm wrong.