• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Triple EC Cycles (WIP)

Started by falkor2k15, Aug 12, 06:12 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

falkor2k15

Re-tracking upon a loss instead of a win, and flat-betting except for the EC hedging:





The idea is to use the TRiplE Ec Cycle to assist in reaching the closure of a Number Cycle!  O0
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

falkor2k15

Next win was a Cycle Length 13!

"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

falkor2k15

It's all about the concepts guys... the characteristics of the cycles and pigeons within the parallel universe!


Get to this point then you can start laying down the real cash... It's call your bluff time for Mr. Random!
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Aug 15, 08:28 PM 2017
I think you guys are being too harsh on Gilius-Falkor.

As residents of planet Round Earth, we have been spoiled by Excel, Powerpoint, and other similar software products.

On planet Flat Earth (where Gilius-Falkor resides), they do not have the above stuff -- they are a little bit behind us  technology-wise.

So that is why his posts look so primitive to us. But, hopefully, his flat earth gang will catch up with us technologically sometime in the  future.

Such a fun time to be alive, will be my first flat earth solar eclipse.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

praline

Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Aug 15, 08:28 PM 2017
So that is why his posts look so primitive to us.
If you are not able to understand what is written in falkors posts... Yes, you can think that this is primitive, but he is using some concepts that can potentially lead to a winning system.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

3Nine

Quote from: praline on Aug 16, 03:32 PM 2017
If you are not able to understand what is written in falkors posts... Yes, you can think that this is primitive, but he is using some concepts that can potentially lead to a winning system.

You would be better off going to the source, not the muddled mess he is creating.
Do I turn the wheel,
or does the wheel turn me?

praline

Even if he is going a completely wrong way, atleast, he reminds us that there are other ways to follow or ways to thinking  and not just "after ten red bet black".
I think you agree with me if i would say that from all active posters on the forum, he has quite a good possibility to go a bit back in his studies and maybe stay abit more with concepts he is using in this useless systems.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

falkor2k15

I created dependent variance today; I wonder if that's the key?  :question:
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

praline

If you can explain what is a "dependent variance", somebody will say you that this is not the key.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

falkor2k15

Quote from: praline on Aug 16, 06:08 PM 2017
If you can explain what is a "dependent variance", somebody will say you that this is not the key.
One variance stream has to catch up with the other variance stream - and the variance never drifts far, i.e. no wild swings?
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 3
2 3
3 4
4 4
5 4
6 5
6 6
6 7
7 7
7 8
8 8
8 9
8 10
9 10
10 10
11 10
12 10
13 11
14 11
14 12
15 12
15 13
15 14
16 14
17 14
17 15
18 15
18 16
18 17
19 18
20 19
21 19
22 20
22 21
23 21
24 21
25 21
25 22
26 23
26 24
27 24
28 24
28 25
28 26
29 26
29 27
29 28
29 29
29 30
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

praline

Are you searching for a coincidence between two random streams?
Or did you found a dependency between those streams?
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

MoneyT101

Falkor i think your headed down the right path.   I was thinking of something similar using two different games at the same time that break even.
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

MoneyT101

i wrote a long post and this new update deleted it  >:(

falkor i was thinking of something similar playing two separate games which on their own they break even or have a small profit.  but playing them together makes the gains go up

stats for Both games on their own
loss of 2= 25%
win of 2= 25%
win of 1= 50%

Im still working on the triggers but i see similar play in your charts
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

falkor2k15

MoneyT, I think there's 2 concepts here based on what you are describing:
1) Capture more wins includes hedging bets and trying to break even or gain small profit. This is what I'm testing by having triple ECs together alongside numbers.
2) Capturing more spins includes using the small cycle in parallel to help with the big cycle. We could try to win with the small cycle or small repeats before parachuting to the bigger cycle and repeats happening over a larger length of spins.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

Taotie

Falkor keeps harping on about hedging bets.

Can anyone explain the point of bet hedging, or give a clear example?

Thanks.

-