Questions regarding the Timing+LW metodology.

[flukey luke]

Unfortunately albertojonas, I do not have a scooby doo when it comes to the programming game. One thing regarding programming however that I would like to mention and don't get me wrong, I am certainly not against it, I would love someone to programme my ideas and see if it can mimic my play, however, to be a long term winner AND survivor at roulette, you need to get your hands dirty, this means getting under the bonnet and having a good poke around. In fact the bonnet analogy is probably a very good one, because it really is a case of stripping everything down and putting it all back together again piece by piece. This is where I think programming  loses something. If a programme tells you to back 27 on the next spin, all well and good, but WHY are you backing 27. I am someone who would want to know why.
I think there are a few elements to my system here that a programme could not bring to my attention which I would consider pretty crucial for making a decision.

[flukey luke]

Regarding the system itself, I do have some extra add ons which could be implimented.
I did not want to go to deep in the one thread. I will start a seperate thread titled 'Timing and the LW methodology VOLUME 2' which will explain in more detail. That could take some time to complete, but there is no real rush. I will try and get it completed by the end of the week.
Just to note, the system as presented in the first thread 'Timing and the LW Methodology' is a complete system. You do not need anything else to go along with that if you don't wish.
On saying that, by including volume 2, it will give you more options.

[esoito]

@fl
You wrote:
"I think there are a few elements to my system here that a programme could not bring to my
attention which I would consider pretty crucial for making a decision. "

Easily overcome!

The program could offer

1  a confirmation button for its selection(s)

2  a box in which to type your selection if you want to override the program's decision

[albertojonas]

it would be great

[flukey luke]

Hello guys/gals.

@esoito, of course you are right. I did read somewhere once that any part of a system could be programmed. It would just require the author of the system to state his/her preferences.
I am the old fashioned pen and paper type  

Alberto, I hope one day some of my ideas can be programmed.

Today, I should be able to finish the betting charts for volume 2.  Then I want to show an example from a session I played last night at dublinbet.

In volume the 2, the bets can range from 3 streets (minimum) up to around 6. The average is less than 5. This is good because you can have more losses than wins and still come out winning flat betting.

[A3on]

Hello Flukey Luke

I've been reviewing your betting chart and I found a gap

1,2,7.
-------

3. 3,6,8,9,11,12.
4. 3,4,8,10.
5. 3,4,5,9,10.
6. 3,4,5,6,9,11,12.
8. 4,5,8,11,12.
10. 3,6,8,10.
11. 4,5,8,9,11.
12. 3,4,6,8,9,10,12.


You forgot about street 9

Best regards,
Afonso

[flukey luke]

That's well spotted Afonso,
For some reason, I can't go back and modify it.
So for the three missing streets 1,2,7. The bets for 9 would be streets 3,6,9,12.

Thank you my friend, we should rename you eagle eye. 

[A3on]

Thanks my friend.
When I study something I read everything very carefully ^^

I'm seeing if I can't get some free time today to test your volume 2 Strategy  

Regards,
Eagle Eye

[A3on]

Btw, I forgot to mention this one

1,2,5.
--------
3. 3,6,7,9,11,12.
4. 3,4,8,10,11,12.
6. 3,4,6,9,10,12.
8. 3,4,8,11,12.
9. 3,4,6,7,9,12.
10. 7,8,10.
11. 6,7,8,9,11.
12. 3,6,7,8,9,10,12.


Bet for street 7 is lacking 

[flukey luke]

Hello Afonso,

I will go through them as well and check for any that I missed.
Thank you for bringing it up.

If the three missing streets are 1,2,5. For the 7, you would bet streets 4,6,7,10,11.

[A3on]

It's all good now my friend ! Nothing more is missing.

You did a great job !!!! 

[flukey luke]

Just had a quick check through myself and everything seems present and correct.
Cheers Afonso and keep us updated on your testing. 

[A3on]

I don't have much time.
But I simply can go out without making at least a quick test 

I just have a question, in you sessions examples you never passed through a 0
So when a 0 comes we just accept the loss and we continue like anything had happen or we re-track again?

Example:
10 -
7   - 6,7,9
0   -
10 - 3,6,10  (we don't chart here or we pretend 0 didn't come and we go to master chart and take streets 7-10?)
4   - 1,4,6

[flukey luke]

Afonso, if the 0 comes, just ignore it and carry on. 

[A3on]

Just made a quick session of 30 spins.

In 23 bets I got three times 0
As everyone know, if we are betting number 0 makes so much difference as any other number, but when we are betting dozens, even chances, streets,... the number 0 is a really pain in the ass.
Still it ended up in profit ^^
+18 units

I just emailed you with the excel file.
Feel free to post it on your Volume 2 thread as one more example of the system 

Best regards,
Afonso