• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

TURBO'S REPEATERS SIMULATION.

Started by daveylibra, Apr 01, 06:18 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

The General

I've tested Turbo's repeater idea over a gazillion spins.  Unfortunately the results are exactly what probability predicts.

This of course leads me to question the validity of the results others have had using various free mode betting modules.

Rather than test the modules for fitness (free play games), it makes far more sense to just look at basic probability/math to see how the accuracy of the prediction could possibly be improved in the random game... by attempting to exploit the "repeaters."   Turbo says that "math beats a math game," but can't seem to provide any math to support his idea.  The real math says that there's just one or two too many pockets in order for his idea to work in the random game.

Sooo then...where's the logic?  If basic probability says it doesn't work, then why should it???

1.  Is it because past spins reach foward in time to influence future spins?
2.  Is it because the numbers have become self aware?
3. Magic?


-The General

Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

nottophammer

How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

Steve

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

cht

Quote from: The General on Apr 04, 04:10 AM 2018
I've tested Turbo's repeater idea over a gazillion spins.  Unfortunately the results are exactly what probability predicts.

This of course leads me to question the validity of the results others have had using various free mode betting modules.

Rather than test the modules for fitness (free play games), it makes far more sense to just look at basic probability/math to see how the accuracy of the prediction could possibly be improved in the random game... by attempting to exploit the "repeaters."   Turbo says that "math beats a math game," but can't seem to provide any math to support his idea.  The real math says that there's just one or two too many pockets in order for his idea to work in the random game.

You mean if there was not one or two too many pockets then his idea will work ?  :xd:

Sooo then...where's the logic?  If basic probability says it doesn't work, then why should it???

1.  Is it because past spins reach foward in time to influence future spins?
2.  Is it because the numbers have become self aware?
3. Magic?


-The General

TurboGenius

Quote from: The General on Apr 04, 04:10 AM 2018I've tested Turbo's repeater idea over a gazillion spins.  Unfortunately the results are exactly what probability predicts.

You haven't tested anything... who's "misleading" ?

Live spins from last night -
20 (oldest)
4
32
33
20 repeat
3
27
3 repeat
30
19
22
15
15
15 (go figure - and you can't figure out how to win)
21
12
0
19
15 (good night)

Now if you can't figure this out General - please stick to wobbly wheels and secret devices aimed at the wheel to get by. I can't help you.
You're "testing" in your head never goes past 1 spin - that's all you see.
If you'd understand that it's a game made up of spins (each independent from the last)
combined to give a session result - you might have a chance, but that won't happen.
Waste of time.

"Oh, but those spins will never happen again in that order - it's the same odds as any numbers appearing in any order......" true and true... you just don't get it.
It's not Magic - it's math. "Well, show the math !!!"..... Do it yourself.
Maybe it's just hopeless to keep posting.
Imagine you want a new car but you're too lazy to go to the dealer and buy one.
You want me to build you one from all of the individual parts and then give it to you
because you're that damn lazy to go get it yourself. Sure... Do it yourself.
I gave you everything you need to know - if you insist that I build you the car instead -
it's going to be a long wait. Just claim that cars don't exist and save yourself the
hard work of using common sense and your brains.
link:[url="s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg"]s://s18.postimg.cc/rgantqrs9/image.jpg[/url]
link:[url="s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif"]s://s15.postimg.cc/5lgm9j86j/turbo-banner.gif[/url]

Turner

Quote from: Steve on Apr 02, 04:08 AM 2018
1. 37 different numbers in 37 spins is exactly as rare as any other combination of numbers. Why not bet against any rare combination? Theres no difference at all.

2. Hot numbers dont work. Thats why casinos give you that data free. The odds are still 1 in 37.

You are stuck in classic fallacy and just need to test fully.
I walk in a casino and this is the history board.
Everyone in the casino says "wow...Ive never seen that before"




I walk in the casino and see this history board and just me says "wow...Ive never seen that before"






Steve

Turbo, sorry but you just posted nothing of substance. Nobody is attacking you personally. Dont take it personally.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

ZERO

Quote from: Turner on Apr 04, 07:23 AM 2018
I walk in a casino and this is the history board.
Everyone in the casino says "wow...Ive never seen that before"




I walk in the casino and see this history board and just me says "wow...Ive never seen that before"



:xd: :xd: :xd: :thumbsup:

jekhb76

Quote from: TurboGenius on Apr 04, 07:20 AM 2018
You haven't tested anything... who's "misleading" ?

Live spins from last night -
20 (oldest)
4
32
33
20 repeat
3
27
3 repeat
30
19
22
15
15
15 (go figure - and you can't figure out how to win)
21
12
0
19
15 (good night)

Now if you can't figure this out General - please stick to wobbly wheels and secret devices aimed at the wheel to get by. I can't help you.
You're "testing" in your head never goes past 1 spin - that's all you see.
If you'd understand that it's a game made up of spins (each independent from the last)
combined to give a session result - you might have a chance, but that won't happen.
Waste of time.

"Oh, but those spins will never happen again in that order - it's the same odds as any numbers appearing in any order......" true and true... you just don't get it.
It's not Magic - it's math. "Well, show the math !!!"..... Do it yourself.
Maybe it's just hopeless to keep posting.
Imagine you want a new car but you're too lazy to go to the dealer and buy one.
You want me to build you one from all of the individual parts and then give it to you
because you're that damn lazy to go get it yourself. Sure... Do it yourself.
I gave you everything you need to know - if you insist that I build you the car instead -
it's going to be a long wait. Just claim that cars don't exist and save yourself the
hard work of using common sense and your brains.
@Turbo,
If i were you, i would stop responding to All these posts, they don't read, they Just asume things and are not willing to put some personal effort in it. It's Just a waste of time to respond to All those Who don't listen. Just my two cents.

jekhb76

Those Who want to learn, Will learn.
Those Who want to Read, Will be leaning. :thumbsup:

denzie

Quote from: TurboGenius on Apr 04, 07:20 AM 2018


Live spins from last night -
20 (oldest)
4
32
33
20 repeat
3
27
3 repeat
30
19
22
15
15
15 (go figure - and you can't figure out how to win)
21
12
0
19
15 (good night)



Nice session....I would only played on 15 , 20 , 3   :thumbsup:

(But only 15 would won)
As spins roll off our predictions get better

cht

Quote from: jekhb76 on Apr 04, 07:56 AM 2018
@Turbo,
If i were you, i would stop responding to All these posts, they don't read, they Just asume things and are not willing to put some personal effort in it. It's Just a waste of time to respond to All those Who don't listen. Just my two cents.
One look for members on forums to play wobbly wheels for him,  the other sells secret devices. Why would they read ?

I read APers need 400units and more bankroll that depends on your edge.

Steve

such high level of ignorance. Its actually fascinating. Like flat earthers insisting earth is flat and saying round earthers are the dumb ones....without giving proof except that which proves the opposite.

Flat earthers dont understand really simple logic and testing.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Steve

Really this is no different to arguing with flat earthers. They just don't get it. They think everything is a conspiracy. Everyone that disagrees with them is a shill or has something to lose. Their view is twisted. And they don't understand simple logic.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

denzie

As spins roll off our predictions get better

-