TURBO'S REPEATERS SIMULATION.

[Turner]

You mean this one Turner ? 



Of course can start with 2s....

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16250.0

[denzie]

Forgot to say you can do this with streets, lines, ....etc ,........

.....
.....
And sectors you create on the Wheel 

[jekhb76]

well, it doesnt have to be either

It could be that he was doing something different when we spoke and I understood it. There is a full post on here what he did.

Understand.
And Turbo is also applying methods in Different ways.
What i said above about No betting Will be done when there isn't a repeat, and in your link he said this;

1) "Trigger"
Waiting for something to happen before betting is a waste of time.
There is no event that somehow signals what the future event will be.

From this i can Read that he bets from spin 1?
Now who's confused?

[jekhb76]

Forgot to say you can do this with streets, lines, ....etc ,........

.....
.....
And sectors you create on the Wheel 

That maybe. But until we know what the biggest drawdown would be if we play like this, bet every number that comes and remove 1 unit on each after every cycle, we can't play this. Be don't k ow our bankroll must be.
And i think there Will be too many numbers to play before reaching a profit.

[denzie]

That maybe. But until we know what the biggest drawdown would be if we play like this, bet every number that comes and remove 1 unit on each after every cycle, we can't play this. Be don't k ow our bankroll must be.
And i think there Will be too many numbers to play before reaching a profit.

Didn't say you should bet like that. Just saying to know the variance 


Ask coderjoe

[jekhb76]

Didn't say you should bet like that. Just saying to know the variance 

Ask coderjoe

@DENZIE
Sended you a pm den. 

[jekhb76]

I said it a couple times already....

But maybe i should be more accurate.
Just choose a way to play repeaters. (Keep it simple , so not the complicated stuff). Play this in rx. Play sessions of 200/300 spins max.(realistic sessions). Play 1000 sessions. Yep its a bit of work. Now check the graphs. Check the ---> DD <--- . Now once you KNOW the average and maximum DD of your system..... cant you make it win ? I can. You could even say its like measuring variance 


Now dont go doing something stupid like bringing 1k to stop at first profit ! So this means also check the average profit after you start to bet. 

As much as i would Love to test like this, it would probably took me a year to complete. With 5 kids, were two of them needs Special trreatment and constant nursing, it is very difficult to do this. Maybe the awnser is play Every repeater until end of cycle and then remove All the unhit ones and decrease the chip amount on All, but like i said i don't sadly Have the Time not the Energy to test so much sessions to know the biggest drawdown etc. Wish i could, but lately it's hospital in and out and alot of uncertanty regarding the Health of one of our youngest Boys, future is uncertain for him. But i Hope i indeed find the awnser to how to play the repeaters, but there is More in Life and the Health of my kids is the Most important one. So unless someone could do this Large test, we May never know.

[boyd30]

What means DD?

[jekhb76]

What means DD?

DrawDown (how many units you are in - min.)

[boyd30]

What I have tested on RX is something similar like you play jekhb76. I started with 2 peaters and started betted when they show up. When 3 peaters showed Up I put one more unit on them. But I kept the 2 peaters as well. But maybe like you say, starting with 3 peaters would be better. I can also think about starting with 8 or 9 peaters. On RX it don't take time. It's a waiting if you play on-line, but if you would always win, it's ok.

[boyd30]

DrawDown (how many units you are in - min.)

Thank you jekhb76. By the way, wish you the best both in family and play.

[jekhb76]

Thank you jekhb76. By the way, wish you the best both in family and play.

Thanks.
But as you can See, i don't Have much Time to test things propaply.

[Steve]

Jekh, i hope youre not looking at roulette to pay hospital bills. With such a mindset and insufficient experience, you're more likely to worsen a financial situation. Roulette done right is profitable. But professional play is not suitable for most people.

[Ricky]

I've tested Turbo's repeater idea over a gazillion spins.  Unfortunately the results are exactly what probability predicts.

This of course leads me to question the validity of the results others have had using various free mode betting modules.

Rather than test the modules for fitness (free play games), it makes far more sense to just look at basic probability/math to see how the accuracy of the prediction could possibly be improved in the random game... by attempting to exploit the "repeaters."   Turbo says that "math beats a math game," but can't seem to provide any math to support his idea.  The real math says that there's just one or two too many pockets in order for his idea to work in the random game.

Sooo then...where's the logic?  If basic probability says it doesn't work, then why should it???

1.  Is it because past spins reach foward in time to influence future spins?
2.  Is it because the numbers have become self aware?
3. Magic?


-The General

Hi General,
If you look at any system based on the repeaters you are correct in saying that this method can't overcome the math that in 37 spins you could get 37 (or 38) unique outcomes. This would be game over for a system that uses progression betting 8 numbers for say 24 spins.

But if you look at what we are trying to achieve here its not to get 100% win rate that we will get a repeat of ONE of our 8 numbers within 24 spins. What we need is a win rate of  repeat of 1 in 24 spins 7 out of 8 times. So we should look at the wins in terms of 100 games played. So if we caqn overcome the losses with more wins to cover the loss and a few more to get into profit then we have a winning system.

So the question is what repeater based method can we deploy that will avoid the sleepers and find the repeats enough times to overcome the house edge?

cheers,
Ricky

[ZERO]

Jekh, i hope youre not looking at roulette to pay hospital bills. With such a mindset and insufficient experience, you're more likely to worsen a financial situation. Roulette done right is profitable. But professional play is not suitable for most people.

True words and never play with money you can not afford to lose!