Viper9

[ignatus]

****OK This is testing-zone***** I need help testing this...this maybe one of my most stupiest system ever? hah, not that you're suprised by now??....we'll see! 

TRIGGER: Wait for 3 hits in a row within a DOZEN or a COLUMN.

Procedure: When you got the trigger, Bet all splits within the 2 *other* Columns or Dozens ..Except the last 3 hit Splits within those 2 Columns or Dozens. (9 Splits bet)

idea; you've got a total hit of minimum 6 times by 18 numbers, from trigger, most of the time, "normally" i doubled up 3 times, at most 5 times, (as you can see in the chart).....This "system" may go straight to hell, i'd be VERY suprised if it didn't...:S

Progression; Whichever you like,(?) i used a simple martingale from the first test

[jekhb76]

Don't wanna Sound rude but how many systems should we test? They are coming down on us like rain.
Too many isn't Always a good thing.

[ignatus]

Don't wanna Sound rude but how many systems should we test? They are coming down on us like rain.
Too many isn't Always a good thing.

I fail, i try anew, i do test my own systems,....(i this one too), ....atleast now im posting in "testing -zone"...

[ignatus]

Well, 2/4 wins so far, but what's "good" about it, playing the way i did, (with an ordinary martingale) WHEN you lose, you don't lose a 1000u BR, normally that will be a couple of 100-unit's less, in my examples a loss would be about ~500-600u and a win IS 1000u so,.... profits CAN be made even though the bad winrate?,....still more testing is needed, i'll see, (i do one more test,...)

calculating wins losses (with a 1000u BR)

losses
630
495
=1125

wins
1035
1035
=2070

Total= +945