• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Beating the outside 50/50

Started by Winner, Apr 23, 03:37 PM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Winner

Quote from: Herby on Apr 24, 10:41 AM 2018
Hi Winner,
whats the logic behind w and l ?
5 -> 3 w
3 -> 4 l
4 -> 3  l  etc ?
Just betting random I can't use logic to play it's not logical  it's about proving probability wrong.

Winner

For ex. Roulette gives this outcome
LLL 1 now my bet won't be HHL 6 see how many times you can make this win .

Herby

TNX Winner,
I should have asked for relations instead of logic.
You gave a good answer.

Roulettebeater

Winner

When do you want to show us actions instead of words ?
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Herby

Is there a reason to bet against fig6 after f1?
The total antifigure after f1 could be f5 ? (corrected ...)

Or in other thinking f7 ...

Winner

Quote from: Herby on Apr 24, 11:14 AM 2018
I there a reason to bet against fig6 after f1?
The total antifigure after f1 could be f5 ? (corrected ...)

Or in other thinking f7 ...
[/quote
Ex if you run all 8 patterns for 24 spins I have yet to see all 8 show therefore combos are possible  the combos are something that can be played around with to prove probability wrong. The reason again there is none just like there is no reason why roulette throws out repeaters more then odds say its  just something that happens .
Like I said 6 in a row losses is what I base my bets on through combos if probability says I should lose 6 in row evert 74 spins and in 1500 hundred spins that means I should lose close to 14 times and if 3 or 4 I'm well below probability .
The 6 and 1 is an ex.try it you might like the results .then move on to the next.

Winner

Quote from: Roulettebeater on Apr 24, 11:13 AM 2018
Winner

When do you want to show us actions instead of words ?
Well you could for starters take out your super computer and test the 6 and 1and see how many times you get a double loss  I don't need to test I ve done enough to over the years that I have no time to bullshit. Other combos will come but you sound desperate I thought you had a killer system lol

Winner

Here something to think about you have a 6  and 1 combo is a loss a 616 combo is a double loss see how many times Random can make this lose .

jekhb76

Quote from: Winner on Apr 24, 04:02 PM 2018
Here something to think about you have a 6  and 1 combo is a loss a 616 combo is a double loss see how many times Random can make this lose .
Can you explaining it More?

Winner

Quote from: jekhb76 on Apr 24, 04:31 PM 2018
Can you explaining it More?
I did not not think you were into 50/50 bets

Bigbroben

There was this dude in the MonteCarlo anecdotes:he'd bet alternatively  for switch-same-switch-same.  He would not often lose 4 times in a row.  Only a doublet pattern on the wrong side would make him lose.  Guess u could try for a run of 6.  Still,i think whatever the betting decision, there is perfect balance between potential wins vs potential losses.
What' a win in your example? A w in a progression of 3?

I like staying with the same color until 2 losses in a row.  Again, doublets kill it (rrbbrrbb).  Or 3 in row.
But the thing with 2 losses, it assures you at least a 50%win until changing side (not so bad with tiers et tout).

You really go random with the 3-spin pattern you decide to bet for?
Life is hard, and then you die.
Mes pensées sont le dernier retranchement de ma liberté.

Winner

Quote from: Bigbroben on Apr 24, 08:31 PM 2018
There was this dude in the MonteCarlo anecdotes:he'd bet alternatively  for switch-same-switch-same.  He would not often lose 4 times in a row.  Only a doublet pattern on the wrong side would make him lose.  Guess u could try for a run of 6.  Still,i think whatever the betting decision, there is perfect balance between potential wins vs potential losses.
What' a win in your example? A w in a progression of 3?

I like staying with the same color until 2 losses in a row.  Again, doublets kill it (rrbbrrbb).  Or 3 in row.
But the thing with 2 losses, it assures you at least a 50%win until changing side (not so bad with tiers et tout).

You really go random with the 3-spin pattern you decide to bet for?


Yes there is always the killer pattern. Random finds a way to close the loop .
I'm trying to beat probability .

Winner

The idea hear is this ,can this win yes can this lose yes everything works til it doesn't .
We all know this . Rare events happen but how you deal with it is the key do you chase or go with the flow . I will present a bit more info as soon as I can.

blueman

Quote from: Winner on Apr 24, 10:30 AM 2018
The zeros don't make people lose its the odds and the payout but that we can't change that but probability is not what it seems so this is where we can win  .
Greed and impatience make people lose! :sad2:

Blueprint

Quote from: blueman on Apr 25, 04:22 AM 2018
Greed and impatience make people lose! :sad2:

As well as betting on Losses.


-