37 back to basics

[Bigbroben]

Thanks 6th,
I understand PHP, I think , but not sure how to apply it to roulette.  Did read Falkor's stuff, from the search engine, and others.

Got the Excel done, did not take long.

What's more relevant, quick, or worth?  Excel or Rx?

[6th-sense]

Thanks 6th,
I understand PHP, I think , but not sure how to apply it to roulette.  Did read Falkor's stuff, from the search engine, and others.

Got the Excel done, did not take long.

What's more relevant, quick, or worth?  Excel or Rx?

youve probably read everything i have on php to be honest

quick or worth? its up to the individual who is looking really

i cant code excel or rx...but rx is good and ricky is good at it and his custom  platform he has made for rx gives you many adjustable options on any system in rx before you just click play...rather than just a dgt file
gives you a lot of free play on any system to adjust and test yourself...no one else has this custom feature for rx i know of
more importantly ricky is discreet and trustworthy

[Herby]

Where do we get infos on the PHP?  In this forum or others...

This one was good. 

He always won in a cycle ..
I think he was very similar to vaddis in his thinking

Ayks tracker is probably the best tool in the world to check stuff out like this

I would say his pigeon hole theory is along the same lines

An average of 24 numbers out and 12 repeats

On ayks tracker there are only 37 empty slots

They would be the pigeon hole boxes there’s no two ways about it

Those 24 pigeons cannot all be standalone numbers you would need let’s say 48 pigeon hole boxes

Those pigeons must at least pair or flock together..they have to

Be it one or two pairs

Do a test and see how many times it takes to make a pair

Person S pics shows both extremes one for repeats and then one for expansion on unhits

Repeats and unhits and unique  are all tied together

Dyslexic was a one cycle winner but had a large bankroll that would make sure he won it

He always said he would win on a repeat even if it came in on the 37th spin

[Herby]

Similar question:
Is there a connection between the amount of empty blocks and  the amount of blocks of hit numbers ?

e.g. if numbers 26,27,28,29 have hit (no matter which order), they build 1 block.

If you think of the numbers as a ring:
the amount of empty blocks = the amount of blocks of hit numbers

[Blueprint]

But hey, it's only 9000 spins.

[6th-sense]

This one was good. 

That’s part of it..those boxes align with ec,s  dozens ds streets quads etc

Everything has a cycle

Classic basic example of pigeonhole is say a dozens 1..2..3 are out one must repeat

Blueprint I think is using his streams tracker from out of the box thread using this theory

[Herby]

Blueprint I think is using his streams tracker from out of the box thread using this theory

I only found Blueprint's  link to Mike Tysons video where the  noisy sound combined with my understanding of spoken English leads me to the assumption that Mike Tyson is talking about pidgeons. 

[Madi]

Classic basic example of pigeonhole is say a dozens 1..2..3 are out one must repeat

What? Where is 0.
Ist spin 2 nd doz
2 nd spin 1 st doz
3rd spin 3 doz
4th spin 0
5th spin 0
Where is repeat. This principle got a hole. If u think otherwise come up with a clear roulette related example.

[The General]

Yes, more than just a few holes.   

[6th-sense]

What? Where is 0.
Ist spin 2 nd doz
2 nd spin 1 st doz
3rd spin 3 doz
4th spin 0
5th spin 0
Where is repeat. This principle got a hole. If u think otherwise come up with a clear roulette related example.

That’s is true..that’s a classic example..the streams tracker..the original streams tracker does not have zero in it

Vaddis incorporation of the pairing chart links it to number 1 and number 36

I’ve gave the exact  same argument which you have just given with a certain someone privately a few months back ..

[Madi]

Lets think there is no 0. Still is there any predictable way ( i mean mathmatically with evidence) rather than guessing?

Is there any complicated  things is vaddis description? I dont think so. Pairing has no math base. Sometimes it appears sometimes not.

[Blueprint]

Lets think there is no 0. Still is there any predictable way ( i mean mathmatically with evidence) rather than guessing?

Good question. 

[nottophammer]

Pigeon holes, just watch repeats 1,3,5,7 over 40 spins
They'll show when the R1's go R2.

Thanks to Turbo for his riddles



Or just 36*1,5,25,+

[Madi]

Good question.

Actually bad question. 0 is built in .

[Madi]

Pigeon holes, just watch repeats 1,3,5,7 over 40 spins

Plz talk when it doesnt