37 back to basics

[Madi]

100 unit down. Stoploss
For any straight number system
1win Vs 2loss is the best. Hard

1win Vs 1 loss achievable
2 win VS 1 loss some people like

3 win Vs 1 loss  some prefer

Its doesnt matter if you stop on +1 or +100. Your system needs to overtake your BR frequent enough to be in profit

[Madi]

Vaddi may not have a successful play method, but 6th-Sense does. 

He posted his results over the past six months, actual play, his bankroll growth, and it's impressive.

If he's lying about it, that's fine, people do that sort of thing, caveat emptor for the rest of us, etc.

But if he's telling the truth, and for me personally I believe he is, then he's either just on a lucky streak as Caleb would say, or he's taking advantage of circumstances within binomial distribution or LOTT that have to occur every 37 spins.

It's worth pursuing, and thanks to 6th-Sense for helping out in a way that makes it much easier to understand.

Madi, did you test his hybrid pigeon-hole theory he's presenting here, by going forward to the next available pocket no matter how far out it is?

That's different, something unique, and what I think may be getting lost here is that 6th-Sense isn't offering help with Vaddi's method...he's offering help with a play-style that he developed himself from the basis of Vaddi and Dyksexlic's theories, with some TG thoughts mixed in.  It's original to him. 

If he is winning with this system best of luck to him.

No i havent tested any pegion hole theory. That theory has an extra hole , that is zero.some people forget that hole and i cant do that

[The General]

Binomial distribution merely shows the randomness of a sample and the most likely distribution of hits.  However it does not tell you which numbers will hit.  Furthermore it proves that there are toooo many numbers on the wheel.

[bigmoney]

How can u prove binominal distribution exists ?
Because  we can prove the law of the third exists

[Firefox]

How can u prove binominal distribution exists ?
Because  we can prove the law of the third exists

You can see the binomial distribution in the real world with your own eyes.

For example worn down stone or wooden steps exhibit a shallow binomial curve. The probability someone will step on the centre is greater than someone will step on the edges.

No proof needed, it's existing everywhere, staring you in the face.

[bigmoney]

Thank u ...firefox

[Firefox]

Technically I  suppose the binomial is a discrete distribution, but when n, the number of trials is large, it's a very good fit to the normal distribution curve.

[Herby]

Technically I  suppose the binomial is a discrete distribution, but when n, the number of trials is large, it's a very good fit to the normal distribution curve.

binomial is a discrete distribution,
when n, the number of trials is large, it's a very good fit to the normal distribution (continous)

[Firefox]

Spot on, I'd agree with that!

[Gutroulett]

Roulette is like an experiment where you draw balls from an urn with replacement. You start with 37 white balls (37 non-hit numbers). When one number is drawn you put it back but change the color to blue (1 time hit numbers). If a blue is drawn (2 time hit number) you change the color to orange and put it back....
Calculate binominal distribution and you can see how many number in each category you can expect after any amount of spins.
One special case became famous: the amount of spins that are called 1 cycle. For straight up number that is 37 spins.

link:://:.winning-roulettesystems.com/the-great-universal-theory-winkel.html
Look in the table at spin 37 and you will find that case witch is named the law of the third.
13,4 non-hits numbers; 23,6 one or more time hit numbers. Sum it up! Its 37 numbers.

[Herby]

Already the 2.nd sentence in this advertising page is wrong:
"A German roulette tinkerer published his way to look at roulette in several online forums and called it Great Universal Theory or short G.U.T. "

He was Austrian, I was in PM contact with him more than 10 years ago.

[Firefox]

I just can't understand the obsession with this cycle of 37 spins and numbers which repeat. It's just simple combination theory, there are more ways to arrange numbers including repeats than 37 unique numbers. It's all easily calculable.

But it's all completely useless in deciding, prior to the event, what numbers to back to give yourself any advantage.

The amount of time people spend chasing their tails over this! It would be more productive to write PTO on both sides of a sheet of paper and spend all day amusing themselves with that 

[Proofreaders2000]

I think the aim is to inspire ideas.

[6th-sense]

I just can't understand the obsession with this cycle of 37 spins and numbers which repeat. It's just simple combination theory, there are more ways to arrange numbers including repeats than 37 unique numbers. It's all easily calculable.

But it's all completely useless in deciding, prior to the event, what numbers to back to give yourself any advantage.

The amount of time people spend chasing their tails over this! It would be more productive to write PTO on both sides of a sheet of paper and spend all day amusing themselves with that 

As proof said inspiration..if it was all just about repeats the turbo thread is for that..
Most systems go beyond 37 to catch a win..but inside the cycle is the way to go..
I like your idea of what you propose though and if it’s easily calculable please feel free to post it on this thread it would be interesting to look at ..

[bigmoney]

Gees sixth sense ,proofreaders hand others are calling u out by saying  your not clear and consise and  from what they have tested ...its not profitable  ....thoughts on that mate ?