Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.
The Roulette Systems That Really Work
Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins
Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose
The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos
Started by falkor2k15, Jan 16, 03:24 PM 2020
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Person S on Feb 10, 05:09 PM 2020VDW - if you use it even for events with an edge, for example 75/25, after a while it also loses. I tried this approach while playing EC loops. Example RR / RBR / RBBVDW - looks like this: RRB - L.When statistics say that the EC will be the same as the previous one at 75%. Inserting this event into VDW, you need to make two bets since we donâ€™t know what rotation R will come in combination number 3 ( RBB).
Quote from: falkor2k15 on Feb 14, 12:42 PM 2020I tested playing vdw only on a color that started the 9 spin cycle, but the result is still break even without any negative or positive edge as per betting front runners in standard cycles.
Quote from: ati on Feb 14, 01:25 PM 2020That's interesting, I don't know why my results were different. I'm not sure how many spins you tested, I recommended at least 50K, because the break even period that you see in the middle of my chart is actually around 32,000 spins. But it's quite likely that I was just lucky, because I don't see the dependencies in that game. In the past few months I have really started to understand more and more the dependencies rrbb was talking about, and how every bet must be dependent on a previous outcome. I even tend to agree with him that to find out if a system is a winner or not, requires zero spins of testing. Just by the description you could tell if the system utilizes the dependencies between events or not.But unfortunately I have still not been able to create a system that has a steady win rate and won't collapse if an unlucky sequence of numbers come out.
Quote from: falkor2k15 on Feb 14, 12:46 PM 2020Could you elaborate? I under EC cycles is 75% defined by same. What's that got to do with vdw or encountering a loss or two bets? You lost me again...
Quote from: falkor2k15 on Feb 14, 01:37 PM 2020so how can you say that you don't see the dependency?
Quote from: ati on Feb 14, 01:46 PM 2020My guess is that he tried to utilize the statistical imbalance of an EC event in a vdw sequence. Unfortunately it cannot be done.We cannot have equal risk and reward ratio for two different cycle lengths. And we have to bet every spin. The 75% only applies to the set of outcomes, never to the next spin. We will always (?) have 50/50 chance of winning on the next spin. There are certain dependencies that makes question this, but for now it remains a fact that the next spin on any EC is always 50/50.
Quote from: ati on Feb 14, 01:56 PM 2020Think about this, the color that started the cycle, has over 50% chance to end the cycle. Therefore during the cycle, there is less than 50% chance to see that color. So in theory the other color should have more chance to win. That's why I said that I don't see the dependency. The result was the opposite of what I expected.The issue here is that above mentioned over 50% fact applies to number cycles, and not to a vdw cycle. There can be a repeat within the 9 spin, which would change what the outcomes are dependent on.
Quote from: Person S on Feb 14, 05:40 PM 2020As we know EC it is 50/50. But the cycles are already 75/25 in favor of the determining one. Using VDW, I tried to use cycles, since this is not an equally possible event, but an advantage event. But as I wrote this did not bring success, dispersion waves carried the win into the abyss. Remember the recipe - you need to combine 2 variables. One independent is events, the second is dependent. Which we are all looking for...