0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tekunda

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 111
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +5
Since I was not able to obtain any feedback by members still playing Pattern Breaker, I decided to go ahead and record my results myself.
I have not played PB before so this is all new to me.
I play at the Dragonara Online Casino at an airball roulette machine about 2 coups per minute.
PB is quite time consuming because it takes between 30 and 60 coups until the pattern you end up playing against will show up.
Each game consists of 5 sessions.
Yesterday I started with a 2 € unit size and won my 5 sessions, giving me total of 10€ profit.
It took me 2.5 hours to reach my goal.
Today I increased the unit size to 4€ and I was lucky again and won my 5 sessions with a 20€ profit. It took 3 hours.
Tomorrow I plan to increase the unit size to 8€.
Oh, I forget to mention that I use a 1-2-4 progression.
I will try to keep you updated for as long as I keep playing the Pattern Breaker system.

Let Me Win

  • 250+ posts Member
  • 275
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +33
Someone kindly made a tracker for playing this system which I've attached in case you didn't have it. 

Robbert

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 172
  • Member
  • Rated: +17
Great, Very interested in PB. The topic has 222 pages. Is there a summary how to play the system correctly?

*

ego

  • 1500+ posts member!
  • *****
  • 1518
  • Rated: +56
Tekunda my advice ...
You mention that you will raise your bets, then you will lose everything back to the casino.
Use regression, now is time to lower you bet size and operate with casino money.

If you are interested I can show you Regression Up & Pull progression where you both operate with casino money and use positive staking to with more money, increasing your bets.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Robbert

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 172
  • Member
  • Rated: +17
Alright got it i think.

A question, when you Bert say LLL.

You always bet the 2,4,8 progression? So no matter you lose or win the bet?

Let Me Win

  • 250+ posts Member
  • 275
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +33
Great, Very interested in PB. The topic has 222 pages. Is there a summary how to play the system correctly?

The original rules have been improved and I have listed them here:

Track the numbers as they are spun in groups of 3 spins at a time.  (If zero shows whilst tracking ignore it)

Each group of 3 spins will be a combination of either ODD EVEN RED BLACK HIGH OR LOW

The full list is here:

HHH   RRR   OOO
LLL   BBB   EEE
HLH   RBR   OEO
LHL   BRB   EOE
HHL   RRB   OOE
LLH   BBR   EEO
HLL   RBB   OEE
LHH   BRR   EOO

Each time a pattern of 3 appears cross it out on the list until there is only one pattern left in either the Red/Black or High/Low or Odd/Even list.

When there is only one pattern left you immediately start betting against it using a 1-2-4 martingale.

This is the main difference to the original method in so much as we let the wheel choose our bet.

On average you should have a bet selection after 40 spins of tracking.

If you lose a game you will have lost 7 units.  People regularly report winning streaks of well over ten games without a loss so the occasional 7 unit loss should not hurt too much as every won game makes you 1 unit of profit.

*

ego

  • 1500+ posts member!
  • *****
  • 1518
  • Rated: +56

This is how today's random bits look like:

Code: [Select]
1	1	1 111
1 1 1
1 1 1
2 1 2 212
1 1 1
2 2 1 221
1 2 1 121
1 2 1
1 1 2 112
1 2 1
2 1 1 211
2 2 1
2 1 1
2 2 2 222
2 1 2 W
1 1 1
2 2 1
2 1 2
2 2 1
2 1 2
1 2 2

2 1 2 212
2 2 1 221
2 1 2
1 2 2 122
2 2 2 222
2 1 2
2 2 1
1 2 2
2 1 2
2 1 1 211
2 2 1
2 1 2
2 2 2
2 1 1
2 2 2
1 2 1 121
1 2 2
2 1 2
2 1 1
1 1 2 112
2 1 1 W
2 1 1
2 2 1
1 2 2

2 2 1 221
2 2 2 222
1 1 1 111
2 2 1
1 1 1
2 2 1
1 2 2 122
1 2 1 121
2 1 1 211
1 2 2
1 1 2 112
1 2 1 W
2 2 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
1 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
1 1 1
1 1 2
1 2 1
2 2 2
1 2 2
1 2 2
1 1 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 2 1
1 1 1
2 1 2

1 2 1 121
1 1 1 111
2 2 1 221
1 1 1
2 1 1 211
1 2 2 122
2 2 2 222
1 2 2
2 1 1
2 2 2
1 2 2
1 1 1
2 1 2 212
1 2 2 LW
1 1 1
1 1 1
2 2 2
2 2 1
2 2 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
1 1 1
2 1 2
1 2 2
1 2 2

Now think you won W W W LW and if you would have been playing 2 4 8 you would have made 8 units and have to win 3 times more before you break even - that is stupid - why would you risk your money and maybe give it all back to the casino.
For example, if you staking 2 2 6 and after a win staking 2 4 6 then stop - winning twice and +4 units - now you can almost operate with casino money and not risk your own money.
Let's say you staking 1 1 3 and after a win 1 2 3 - then you up to +6 units and you can not lose your own money.
Then you can choose to continue to regress or increase your bets.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Tekunda

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 111
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +5
Someone kindly made a tracker for playing this system which I've attached in case you didn't have it.

Very kind of you. 👍

Tekunda

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 111
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +5
The original rules have been improved and I have listed them here:

Track the numbers as they are spun in groups of 3 spins at a time.  (If zero shows whilst tracking ignore it)

Each group of 3 spins will be a combination of either ODD EVEN RED BLACK HIGH OR LOW

The full list is here:

HHH   RRR   OOO
LLL   BBB   EEE
HLH   RBR   OEO
LHL   BRB   EOE
HHL   RRB   OOE
LLH   BBR   EEO
HLL   RBB   OEE
LHH   BRR   EOO

Each time a pattern of 3 appears cross it out on the list until there is only one pattern left in either the Red/Black or High/Low or Odd/Even list.

When there is only one pattern left you immediately start betting against it using a 1-2-4 martingale.

This is the main difference to the original method in so much as we let the wheel choose our bet.

On average you should have a bet selection after 40 spins of tracking.

If you lose a game you will have lost 7 units.  People regularly report winning streaks of well over ten games without a loss so the occasional 7 unit loss should not hurt too much as every won game makes you 1 unit of profit.

Let's say numbers 27-7-28 have spun.
So you immediately  would cross out the following 3 combinations on your list:
HLH RRB OOE
and you keep doing this until one of the blocks: high/low red/black odd/even has only one combination left.
As soon as this happens you play against this combination.
Is that the correct way to play the updated version?
One question:
After you have played against the combination, do you discard the tracking results and start tracking anew for the next session?
Or do you keep tracking the other two blocks of combinations?
Because this would speed up the game play as the results of the left-over blocks of combinations are not discarded and the next combination to play  against would show much earlier?

Let Me Win

  • 250+ posts Member
  • 275
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +33
Yes, that is the correct way to play it.

As for the second part of the question my preference would be to just play one game a day using a high stake such as  £50 , £100 , £200,

So I either win £50 a day or lose £350 trying.

Should only be played on a single zero wheel offering  ‘La Partage’ rules for obvious reasons.

ozon

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 482
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +27
Unfortunately, this does not have the slightest chance of success, and the time you devote will not be adequate to profit
This bet selection does not give an edge and only isolates the selection process.
Why is this so because I tried to make better bet selections with a limited marty and all unfortunately did not give the expected results.
Profits were too miserable to make sense.

I will say, the best profits from the appropriate bet selection gave 5 step marty, which caught on target profit 4 units per session, and 5 sessions a day hit n run.

It also quite well expended 1-1-3, the profit 1 unit label 5 sessions a day.

But you have unrealistic expectations of profit, because you think that you will win every session, and in reality you will lose a lot of sessions.
If you will be lucky with frequent playing like 5 sessions a day, you griding out abot 5-10 units per month and that's only with a better bet selection than PB.


Sputnik has all the rations that it's better to play for casino money.
I would approach it like that.


ozon

  • 250+ posts Member
  • ****
  • 482
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +27

I would reverse the staking process completely
I would use a short positive progression, i.e. up after winning.
3-1-1 stop
Target profit 9 units, stop lose 10 units
If you are unlucky and lose immediately 3 bets stop session.

I tried to griding out the profit.

In the long run it does not make sense, but in the short run you can get lucky sometimes.

Tekunda

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 111
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +5
Today was another lucky day. I played another 5 winning sessions, which gave me thirty Euros profits, as I used 6€ units instead of 8€ per unit (which I had planned initially). I thought it might be a good idea to increase the unit size more slowly.
I will stick to 6€ units for another 4 sessions.
If I loose one session I will stick to the 6€ unit size while trying to recover, not increasing the progression.
Once recovered I will increase the unit size to 8€ and take it from there.
I do have one complaint about the method though.
It is quite boring. It really takes between 2.5 to 3 hours to play 5 sessions. There is nothing you can do to speed up game play aside from the method mentioned here by including the other EC.

Tekunda

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 111
  • Roulette Forum .cc | Member
  • Rated: +5
I decided to increase the betting size to €8 per unit.
I did win my five sessions today in roughly 2 hours giving me a nice profit of €40.

Robbert

  • 100+ posts Member
  • ***
  • 172
  • Member
  • Rated: +17
Nice! What is the BR you use?

 

Visit GamblersForum.com - For discussions about other casino games.

Blackjack Forum: Card counting and professional strategies

Poker Forum: learn from the best poker players

Video Poker Forum: maximize chances of winning

Baccarat Forum: the popular and simple card game

Craps Forum: strategies and the viability of dice control

Slots Forum: Learn the legitimate ways of beating slots

Sports Betting Forum: the most widespread gambling

Horse & Dog Racing Forum: the thrill of racing

Keno & Lottery Forum: discuss potentially new strategies