• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Opinions - Average Strike Rate for "Matrix" systems

Started by Maui13, Oct 25, 02:00 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Maui13

Howdy everyone...

So whilst I'm busy tweaking an old system I thought to ask the old and wise ...

Do you think that ANY of the matrix systems has better strike rates than the normal tracking/betting systems?

For example - If I wanted to play double dozens and I had to compare the following two methods ( normal vs. matrix )

Normal - last dozen + previous to last dozen

vs.

Matrix type - 123, bet against 123 to happen again.

My opinion is yes, or at best it seems that way. I enjoy tracking it, have a reference to look back at, dodge certain patterns. Overall it feels nicer to me. That's why I ask the question - if there is any merit to it?

Guys - and please. Don't shoot each other down. I asked opinions and you're entitled to your own.

....and GO  ;)


Trust the timing of your life!

Thanatos

About playing against 1,2,3 there is the great "Grassroots" thread in here:
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16172.0

Sure its 122 pages long but there is also a lot of drama & fluff you can skip past so its not so long a read really.

Anyways what i got myself from the double dozen/cloumn thread is that its pointless to have a progression higher then 2 steps like 1,3 or even just 1,2. This combined with . Stats clearly show that most wins are won by far on the 1st or 2nd step in a normal 1, 3. 9, 27, 81 so going to step 3 or further is simply pointless, risky and potentially will kill you.

Then there is the whole "rule of never play immediately after a loss" when playing with large board coverage procentages like Double Dozen/column or higher. It will of save you from drowning in a loss, loss, loss,  loss, loss when doing a  1, 3. 9, 27, 81 progression .. but also work if you flatbet i find. Just having patience and wait with betting untill you see a virtual win again & then let the higher procentage do it job with time.

Anyways i wrote my own way of playing double columns in the back of the grassroots thread (page 122) where i throw in a bit of regression too. Sure regression my turn it into a even slower grind but it mean you start playing with the "casinos money" quicker too.
I am Thunder Pants

Irish88

Everytime I think of a column strategy I think of this thread.

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=4505.0

I really do think there is something to be exploited here.  I have seen guys win huge amounts exploiting the layout of the double zero wheel. Maybe we can incorporate your ideas with this.

-